{"title":"Prediction and influencing factors analysis of stored grain temperature and intergranular relative humidity","authors":"Yifei Qin , Yuan Zhang , Shanshan Duan , Yunhao Cao , Xintao Jia , Quanen Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.fbp.2025.06.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>To address the issues of insufficient accuracy and poor interpretability in the prediction of temperature and intergranular relative humidity (RH) for bulk-stored grain, this study developed an optimized prediction model based on the extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) algorithm. The model incorporated the interaction of meteorological factors with the temperature and RH within the bulk grain. Hyperparameters were optimized using the grid search method, and Shapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) was employed to quantify the contribution and interaction mechanism of each input variable, thereby enhancing model interpretability. Seven meteorological variables and the surface RH of the bulk grain were used to predict the surface temperature. Similarly, meteorological data and surface temperature were used to predict the surface RH, and the model performance was validated using an experimental silo dataset. For benchmarking purposes, several commonly used models, including Linear Regression (LR), Random Forest (RF), Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM), and Support Vector Regression (SVR) were also tested. The results indicated that the XGBoost model outperformed the baseline models in predictive accuracy. The RMSE, R², MAE, and MAPE results for average surface temperature prediction were 1.59, 0.88, 0.79, 3.56 %, respectively, while those for average surface RH were 0.32, 0.95, 0.16, 0.28 %. SHAP analysis revealed that the influence of meteorological variables on grain surface temperature and intergranular RH was complex, with air temperature, air pressure, and air RH identified as the most significant factors. The proposed model demonstrated both high predictive accuracy and strong interpretability, offering a scientific basis for the monitoring and control of grain storage conditions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12134,"journal":{"name":"Food and Bioproducts Processing","volume":"153 ","pages":"Pages 67-76"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food and Bioproducts Processing","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960308525001154","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
To address the issues of insufficient accuracy and poor interpretability in the prediction of temperature and intergranular relative humidity (RH) for bulk-stored grain, this study developed an optimized prediction model based on the extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) algorithm. The model incorporated the interaction of meteorological factors with the temperature and RH within the bulk grain. Hyperparameters were optimized using the grid search method, and Shapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) was employed to quantify the contribution and interaction mechanism of each input variable, thereby enhancing model interpretability. Seven meteorological variables and the surface RH of the bulk grain were used to predict the surface temperature. Similarly, meteorological data and surface temperature were used to predict the surface RH, and the model performance was validated using an experimental silo dataset. For benchmarking purposes, several commonly used models, including Linear Regression (LR), Random Forest (RF), Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM), and Support Vector Regression (SVR) were also tested. The results indicated that the XGBoost model outperformed the baseline models in predictive accuracy. The RMSE, R², MAE, and MAPE results for average surface temperature prediction were 1.59, 0.88, 0.79, 3.56 %, respectively, while those for average surface RH were 0.32, 0.95, 0.16, 0.28 %. SHAP analysis revealed that the influence of meteorological variables on grain surface temperature and intergranular RH was complex, with air temperature, air pressure, and air RH identified as the most significant factors. The proposed model demonstrated both high predictive accuracy and strong interpretability, offering a scientific basis for the monitoring and control of grain storage conditions.
期刊介绍:
Official Journal of the European Federation of Chemical Engineering:
Part C
FBP aims to be the principal international journal for publication of high quality, original papers in the branches of engineering and science dedicated to the safe processing of biological products. It is the only journal to exploit the synergy between biotechnology, bioprocessing and food engineering.
Papers showing how research results can be used in engineering design, and accounts of experimental or theoretical research work bringing new perspectives to established principles, highlighting unsolved problems or indicating directions for future research, are particularly welcome. Contributions that deal with new developments in equipment or processes and that can be given quantitative expression are encouraged. The journal is especially interested in papers that extend the boundaries of food and bioproducts processing.
The journal has a strong emphasis on the interface between engineering and food or bioproducts. Papers that are not likely to be published are those:
• Primarily concerned with food formulation
• That use experimental design techniques to obtain response surfaces but gain little insight from them
• That are empirical and ignore established mechanistic models, e.g., empirical drying curves
• That are primarily concerned about sensory evaluation and colour
• Concern the extraction, encapsulation and/or antioxidant activity of a specific biological material without providing insight that could be applied to a similar but different material,
• Containing only chemical analyses of biological materials.