Bettina Heise PhD , Peter Schlagnitweit MSc , Robert Pollak DI , Karoline Felbermayer DI , Elisabeth Silberberger Mag , Lukas Kocik MD , Leonhard Trinkl BSc , David Weinzinger DI , Philipp Anderlik DI , Andreas Springer PhD , Marija Geroldinger-Simic MD, PhD , Georg Gruber MD, PhD , Maximilan Hartl MD , Hans Geinitz MD
{"title":"Monitoring of Early Skin Reactions by Optical Coherence Tomography and Dermatoscopy in Patients Receiving Radiation Therapy for Head and Neck Cancer","authors":"Bettina Heise PhD , Peter Schlagnitweit MSc , Robert Pollak DI , Karoline Felbermayer DI , Elisabeth Silberberger Mag , Lukas Kocik MD , Leonhard Trinkl BSc , David Weinzinger DI , Philipp Anderlik DI , Andreas Springer PhD , Marija Geroldinger-Simic MD, PhD , Georg Gruber MD, PhD , Maximilan Hartl MD , Hans Geinitz MD","doi":"10.1016/j.adro.2025.101793","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Patients with head and neck cancer undergoing radiation therapy (RT) may experience pronounced acute skin reactions. We tested whether optical coherence tomography (OCT) and dermatoscopy could detect and monitor early subclinical RT-induced skin changes and might be used as a noninvasive prediction tool for higher-grade acute toxicity.</div></div><div><h3>Methods and Materials</h3><div>Handheld OCT and dermatoscopy were used to monitor skin conditions during RT in head and neck cancer patients. Images were reviewed for typical and suspicious features facilitated by electronic image analyses. Radiation toxicity was graded weekly by a radiation oncologist. Machine learning was used to analyze the recorded data and to extract features, patterns/anomalies, and risk prediction values for high-grade radiation toxicity.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The most common skin features during RT observed by OCT were expressions of hyperkeratosis, blister formation, and in selected cases, formation of extensive microvascular structures or stratification disorder. Dermatoscopy revealed an almost linear increase in skin redness and saturation over the course of RT. By integrating all imaging and clinical data from RT weeks 1 to 3, it was possible to predict an increased risk of severe radiation toxicity (National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade 3 or higher) in the second half of RT. A prediction accuracy of 72%, 75%, and 77% was achieved with OCT and clinical assessment, dermatoscopy and clinical assessment, and all 3 modes combined, respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>OCT and dermatoscopy can detect early radiation-induced skin changes at a subclinical level. Dermatoscopy is more accessible, whereas OCT requires training and further electronic processing to interpret images. Dermatoscopy, but not OCT, can quantify skin color changes, whereas OCT is able to deliver unique information on epidermal suspicious microstructural changes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7390,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Radiation Oncology","volume":"10 7","pages":"Article 101793"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452109425000806","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
Patients with head and neck cancer undergoing radiation therapy (RT) may experience pronounced acute skin reactions. We tested whether optical coherence tomography (OCT) and dermatoscopy could detect and monitor early subclinical RT-induced skin changes and might be used as a noninvasive prediction tool for higher-grade acute toxicity.
Methods and Materials
Handheld OCT and dermatoscopy were used to monitor skin conditions during RT in head and neck cancer patients. Images were reviewed for typical and suspicious features facilitated by electronic image analyses. Radiation toxicity was graded weekly by a radiation oncologist. Machine learning was used to analyze the recorded data and to extract features, patterns/anomalies, and risk prediction values for high-grade radiation toxicity.
Results
The most common skin features during RT observed by OCT were expressions of hyperkeratosis, blister formation, and in selected cases, formation of extensive microvascular structures or stratification disorder. Dermatoscopy revealed an almost linear increase in skin redness and saturation over the course of RT. By integrating all imaging and clinical data from RT weeks 1 to 3, it was possible to predict an increased risk of severe radiation toxicity (National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade 3 or higher) in the second half of RT. A prediction accuracy of 72%, 75%, and 77% was achieved with OCT and clinical assessment, dermatoscopy and clinical assessment, and all 3 modes combined, respectively.
Conclusions
OCT and dermatoscopy can detect early radiation-induced skin changes at a subclinical level. Dermatoscopy is more accessible, whereas OCT requires training and further electronic processing to interpret images. Dermatoscopy, but not OCT, can quantify skin color changes, whereas OCT is able to deliver unique information on epidermal suspicious microstructural changes.
期刊介绍:
The purpose of Advances is to provide information for clinicians who use radiation therapy by publishing: Clinical trial reports and reanalyses. Basic science original reports. Manuscripts examining health services research, comparative and cost effectiveness research, and systematic reviews. Case reports documenting unusual problems and solutions. High quality multi and single institutional series, as well as other novel retrospective hypothesis generating series. Timely critical reviews on important topics in radiation oncology, such as side effects. Articles reporting the natural history of disease and patterns of failure, particularly as they relate to treatment volume delineation. Articles on safety and quality in radiation therapy. Essays on clinical experience. Articles on practice transformation in radiation oncology, in particular: Aspects of health policy that may impact the future practice of radiation oncology. How information technology, such as data analytics and systems innovations, will change radiation oncology practice. Articles on imaging as they relate to radiation therapy treatment.