Exercise Testing Characteristics, Safety, and Quality in Patients with Cancer: A Systematic Review

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate exercise testing (ExT) characteristics, safety, and methodological quality in oncology settings.

Patients and Methods

In this systematic review, we searched electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library) from inception to March 2024. Studies using ExT to evaluate cardiorespiratory fitness or functional capacity in adults with a history of cancer were included. Summary data including ExT characteristics (eg, modality, cardiorespiratory fitness, and functional capacity results), safety (eg, adverse events [AE]), and methodological quality (eg, guideline adherence) was evaluated.

Results

A total of 642 unique studies with 94,960 patients (58.6±9.9 years; 49% women) were included. Among the 26 ExT modalities used, the maximal cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) with measurement of gas exchange (n=284, 40%) and the 6-minute walk test (6MWT) (n=240, 34%) were the most frequently performed. Of the 284 studies that conducted CPET, n=204 (72%) studies reported peak oxygen consumption in mL·kg^-1·min^-1; average peak oxygen consumption was 21.8±5.8 mL·kg^-1·min^-1. Of the 237 studies that conducted 6MWT, 155 (65%) reported distance in meters (m); average distance was 445m±79 m. A total of n=36 (23%) studies reported an average distance above 500 meter. The AEs were monitored in 58 (9.0%) studies wherein a total of 120 non-serious AEs were reported among n=5699 patients (0.02%). Methodological quality and reporting varied considerably.

Conclusion

The findings of this systematic review indicate that CPET with gas exchange and field-based tests such as the 6MWT are widely used; however, future research should prioritize improving safety monitoring, appropriate test selection, and methodological consistency to enhance the applicability of ExT in oncology care.