Vitória Karoline Justino Dos Santos , Marcelo Lucas De Lima Prado , Gabriela Simões Noel Da Silva , Iapunira Catarina Sant'anna Aragão , Felipe Matheus Sant'anna Aragão , Vitor Henrique Justino Dos Santos , Larissa Calixto Hespanhol , Vanessa Lins De Menezes , Francisco Prado Reis , José Aderval Aragão
{"title":"Technosphere insulin in the treatment of Type 1 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Vitória Karoline Justino Dos Santos , Marcelo Lucas De Lima Prado , Gabriela Simões Noel Da Silva , Iapunira Catarina Sant'anna Aragão , Felipe Matheus Sant'anna Aragão , Vitor Henrique Justino Dos Santos , Larissa Calixto Hespanhol , Vanessa Lins De Menezes , Francisco Prado Reis , José Aderval Aragão","doi":"10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2025.109108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aims</h3><div>Conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing Technosphere Insulin and traditional ultra-rapid insulin in T1DM.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Researchers conducted a systematic search on databases to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing two insulin regimens—TI and RAI —in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). The outcomes of interest included changes in HbA1c levels, body weight, and rates of overall and severe hypoglycemia.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Four RCTs were included. There was no significant difference between groups on change in HbA1c (MD 0.04; 95 % CI −0.19–0.27; <em>p</em> = 0.74; I<sup>2</sup> = 0 %). In terms of body weight change, the TI group exhibited significantly less (MD −1.05; 95 % CI −1.63 to −0.46; <em>p</em> = 0.0005; I<sup>2</sup> = 0 %) compared to the RAI group. Adverse events such as overall hypoglycemia (RR −0.97; 95 % CI 0.94–1.01; <em>p</em> = 0.24; I<sup>2</sup> = 26 %) and severe hypoglycemia (RR 0.63; 95 % CI 0.46–0.87; <em>p</em> = 0.005; I<sup>2</sup> = 0 %), were significantly more frequent in the RAI group.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The use of Technosphere Insulin (TI) in T1DM patients did not show a difference in HbA1c, suggesting that TI may offer advantages in weight stability and a lower incidence of hypoglycemic events compared to rapid-acting insulin (RAI).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15659,"journal":{"name":"Journal of diabetes and its complications","volume":"39 9","pages":"Article 109108"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of diabetes and its complications","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1056872725001618","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aims
Conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing Technosphere Insulin and traditional ultra-rapid insulin in T1DM.
Methods
Researchers conducted a systematic search on databases to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing two insulin regimens—TI and RAI —in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). The outcomes of interest included changes in HbA1c levels, body weight, and rates of overall and severe hypoglycemia.
Results
Four RCTs were included. There was no significant difference between groups on change in HbA1c (MD 0.04; 95 % CI −0.19–0.27; p = 0.74; I2 = 0 %). In terms of body weight change, the TI group exhibited significantly less (MD −1.05; 95 % CI −1.63 to −0.46; p = 0.0005; I2 = 0 %) compared to the RAI group. Adverse events such as overall hypoglycemia (RR −0.97; 95 % CI 0.94–1.01; p = 0.24; I2 = 26 %) and severe hypoglycemia (RR 0.63; 95 % CI 0.46–0.87; p = 0.005; I2 = 0 %), were significantly more frequent in the RAI group.
Conclusions
The use of Technosphere Insulin (TI) in T1DM patients did not show a difference in HbA1c, suggesting that TI may offer advantages in weight stability and a lower incidence of hypoglycemic events compared to rapid-acting insulin (RAI).
期刊介绍:
Journal of Diabetes and Its Complications (JDC) is a journal for health care practitioners and researchers, that publishes original research about the pathogenesis, diagnosis and management of diabetes mellitus and its complications. JDC also publishes articles on physiological and molecular aspects of glucose homeostasis.
The primary purpose of JDC is to act as a source of information usable by diabetes practitioners and researchers to increase their knowledge about mechanisms of diabetes and complications development, and promote better management of people with diabetes who are at risk for those complications.
Manuscripts submitted to JDC can report any aspect of basic, translational or clinical research as well as epidemiology. Topics can range broadly from early prediabetes to late-stage complicated diabetes. Topics relevant to basic/translational reports include pancreatic islet dysfunction and insulin resistance, altered adipose tissue function in diabetes, altered neuronal control of glucose homeostasis and mechanisms of drug action. Topics relevant to diabetic complications include diabetic retinopathy, neuropathy and nephropathy; peripheral vascular disease and coronary heart disease; gastrointestinal disorders, renal failure and impotence; and hypertension and hyperlipidemia.