Knowledge, attitudes, and practices in obesity among trained and in-training primary care providers in an urban safety-net hospital system

Alejandro Campos , Kathryn L. Fantasia , Ivania Rizo
{"title":"Knowledge, attitudes, and practices in obesity among trained and in-training primary care providers in an urban safety-net hospital system","authors":"Alejandro Campos ,&nbsp;Kathryn L. Fantasia ,&nbsp;Ivania Rizo","doi":"10.1016/j.obpill.2025.100185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Obesity is a highly prevalent, chronic, and treatable disease that disproportionately impacts some minoritized populations who seek care in safety-net settings. Given that primary care providers (PCPs) often serve as the initial point of contact for patients, we aimed to assess their knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to management of obesity.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This was a cross-sectional study conducted to assess knowledge, attitudes, and practices on obesity management through an anonymous, electronic survey among trained (MD/DO and NP) and in-training (residents) primary care providers (PCPs) in the Departments of Internal Medicine and Family Medicine within an urban safety-net healthcare system.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 350 sampled, 96 PCPs completed the survey (27 % response rate). Participants were predominantly (60.4 %) Internal Medicine trainees. The majority of PCPs accurately identified common weight-related comorbidities and improvement of these with &gt;10 % weight loss. Only 25 % of PCPs correctly identified both body mass index (BMI) criteria for anti-obesity medication (AOM) prescription and only 9.1 % identified both BMI criteria for bariatric surgery. Nearly two-thirds (64 %) of PCPs reported prescribing AOMs, with greater comfort in using glucagon like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA) injectable agents (semaglutide and liraglutide) than with older oral AOMs (phentermine, phentermine-topiramate, and naltrexone-bupropion). Knowledge about side effects and insurance coverage were reported as influencing AOM prescription. Time constraints and lack of training and/or knowledge were identified as barriers in obesity management by more than 50 % of PCPs.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Our study highlights gaps in obesity-related knowledge and practice among PCPs, emphasizing the need for enhanced training, clinical support, and policy reforms to improve obesity management and patient outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100977,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Pillars","volume":"15 ","pages":"Article 100185"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obesity Pillars","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667368125000294","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Obesity is a highly prevalent, chronic, and treatable disease that disproportionately impacts some minoritized populations who seek care in safety-net settings. Given that primary care providers (PCPs) often serve as the initial point of contact for patients, we aimed to assess their knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to management of obesity.

Methods

This was a cross-sectional study conducted to assess knowledge, attitudes, and practices on obesity management through an anonymous, electronic survey among trained (MD/DO and NP) and in-training (residents) primary care providers (PCPs) in the Departments of Internal Medicine and Family Medicine within an urban safety-net healthcare system.

Results

Among 350 sampled, 96 PCPs completed the survey (27 % response rate). Participants were predominantly (60.4 %) Internal Medicine trainees. The majority of PCPs accurately identified common weight-related comorbidities and improvement of these with >10 % weight loss. Only 25 % of PCPs correctly identified both body mass index (BMI) criteria for anti-obesity medication (AOM) prescription and only 9.1 % identified both BMI criteria for bariatric surgery. Nearly two-thirds (64 %) of PCPs reported prescribing AOMs, with greater comfort in using glucagon like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA) injectable agents (semaglutide and liraglutide) than with older oral AOMs (phentermine, phentermine-topiramate, and naltrexone-bupropion). Knowledge about side effects and insurance coverage were reported as influencing AOM prescription. Time constraints and lack of training and/or knowledge were identified as barriers in obesity management by more than 50 % of PCPs.

Conclusions

Our study highlights gaps in obesity-related knowledge and practice among PCPs, emphasizing the need for enhanced training, clinical support, and policy reforms to improve obesity management and patient outcomes.
城市安全网医院系统中训练有素和在职初级保健提供者关于肥胖的知识、态度和做法
背景:肥胖是一种非常普遍的、慢性的、可治疗的疾病,对一些在安全网环境中寻求治疗的少数群体产生了不成比例的影响。鉴于初级保健提供者(pcp)经常作为患者的初始接触点,我们旨在评估他们的知识、态度和与肥胖管理相关的实践。方法本研究是一项横断面研究,旨在通过匿名电子调查,对城市安全网医疗保健系统内内科和家庭医学部培训过的(MD/DO和NP)和正在培训的(住院医师)初级保健提供者(pcp)进行评估肥胖管理的知识、态度和实践。结果在350份抽样调查中,96名执业医师完成问卷调查,回复率为27%。参与者主要是内科实习生(60.4%)。大多数pcp准确地确定了常见的体重相关合并症,并通过体重减轻10%来改善这些合并症。只有25%的pcp正确识别抗肥胖药物(AOM)处方的体重指数(BMI)标准,只有9.1%的pcp正确识别减肥手术的BMI标准。近三分之二(64%)的pcp报告使用AOMs,使用胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP-1 RA)注射剂(semaglutide和liraglutide)比使用较老的口服AOMs(芬特明、芬特明-托吡酯和纳曲酮-安非他酮)更舒适。对副作用的了解和保险范围是影响AOM处方的因素。超过50%的pcp认为时间限制和缺乏培训和/或知识是肥胖管理的障碍。结论本研究突出了pcp在肥胖相关知识和实践方面的差距,强调需要加强培训、临床支持和政策改革,以改善肥胖管理和患者预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信