Comparison of intra-and interobserver reliability analysis of orientation proximal femur physis parameters on radiographs

Q2 Medicine
Varun Garg , Anil Agarwal , Kishmita Sachdeva , K.S. Ankitha
{"title":"Comparison of intra-and interobserver reliability analysis of orientation proximal femur physis parameters on radiographs","authors":"Varun Garg ,&nbsp;Anil Agarwal ,&nbsp;Kishmita Sachdeva ,&nbsp;K.S. Ankitha","doi":"10.1016/j.jcot.2025.103093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The orientation of proximal femur physis is important as it can cause 3-dimensional deformity of the proximal femur. Recently, authors have described various parameters to describe the orientation of proximal femur physis. Therefore, we aim to compare the intra and interobserver reliability of these parameters in this study.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Radiographs of the bilateral hip with the pelvis of children between 1 and 10 years of age were retrieved from the hospital archives to measure the Physeal orientation angle (PO), Physeal tilt angle (PTA), Head shaft angle (HSA), and Alsberg angle (AA). Intra- and inter-observer reliability was tested using Pearson's correlation coefficient and Cronbach's alpha respectively by three independent observers at two separate times, two weeks apart.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The total analysis included 179 radiographs, including 378 hips. PO, PTA, HSA, and AA had values ranging from 9.57<sup>0</sup> -14.04<sup>0</sup>, 19.62°-25.04<sup>0</sup>, 58.75°-65.82<sup>0</sup>, and 24.47<sup>0</sup> -31.79<sup>0</sup>, respectively, for the six data sets (three observers at two different times).The intra-observer reliability of PO, PTA, HSA, and AA ranged from 0.59- 0.72, 0.9–0.95, 0.91–0.95 and 0.86–0.95 respectively. PO, PTA, HSA, and AA had inter-observer reliability values between 0.79 -0.82, 0.88–0.92, 0.85–0.88, and 0.89–0.92, respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The study found that PTA, AA, and HSA have shown good reliability, but they may not accurately represent the true orientation of the capital femoral physis with respect to the femoral neck. For routine follow-up, PO may be a suitable alternative. However, it is not as reliable as other parameters.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":53594,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma","volume":"68 ","pages":"Article 103093"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0976566225001912","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The orientation of proximal femur physis is important as it can cause 3-dimensional deformity of the proximal femur. Recently, authors have described various parameters to describe the orientation of proximal femur physis. Therefore, we aim to compare the intra and interobserver reliability of these parameters in this study.

Methods

Radiographs of the bilateral hip with the pelvis of children between 1 and 10 years of age were retrieved from the hospital archives to measure the Physeal orientation angle (PO), Physeal tilt angle (PTA), Head shaft angle (HSA), and Alsberg angle (AA). Intra- and inter-observer reliability was tested using Pearson's correlation coefficient and Cronbach's alpha respectively by three independent observers at two separate times, two weeks apart.

Results

The total analysis included 179 radiographs, including 378 hips. PO, PTA, HSA, and AA had values ranging from 9.570 -14.040, 19.62°-25.040, 58.75°-65.820, and 24.470 -31.790, respectively, for the six data sets (three observers at two different times).The intra-observer reliability of PO, PTA, HSA, and AA ranged from 0.59- 0.72, 0.9–0.95, 0.91–0.95 and 0.86–0.95 respectively. PO, PTA, HSA, and AA had inter-observer reliability values between 0.79 -0.82, 0.88–0.92, 0.85–0.88, and 0.89–0.92, respectively.

Conclusion

The study found that PTA, AA, and HSA have shown good reliability, but they may not accurately represent the true orientation of the capital femoral physis with respect to the femoral neck. For routine follow-up, PO may be a suitable alternative. However, it is not as reliable as other parameters.
x线片上股骨近端物理参数定位的内部和内部可靠度分析比较
股骨近端物理的方向很重要,因为它可能导致股骨近端三维畸形。最近,作者描述了各种参数来描述股骨近端物理的取向。因此,我们的目的是在本研究中比较这些参数的内部和内部的信度。方法检索1 ~ 10岁儿童双侧髋骨盆x线片,测量骨骺定向角(PO)、骨骺倾斜角(PTA)、头轴角(HSA)和Alsberg角(AA)。三个独立的观察者在两个不同的时间,间隔两周,分别使用Pearson相关系数和Cronbach's alpha测试观察者内部和观察者之间的信度。结果共分析179张x线片,378髋部。6个数据集(3个观测者在2个不同时间)的PO、PTA、HSA和AA值分别为9.570 ~ 14.040、19.62°~ 25.040、58.75°~ 65.820和24.470 ~ 31.790。PO、PTA、HSA和AA的观察者内信度分别为0.59 ~ 0.72、0.9 ~ 0.95、0.91 ~ 0.95和0.86 ~ 0.95。PO、PTA、HSA、AA的观察者间信度值分别为0.79 ~ 0.82、0.88 ~ 0.92、0.85 ~ 0.88、0.89 ~ 0.92。结论PTA、AA、HSA均具有良好的可靠性,但可能不能准确反映股骨骨骺相对于股骨颈的真实方位。对于常规随访,PO可能是一个合适的选择。但是,它不像其他参数那样可靠。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma
Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
181
审稿时长
92 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma (JCOT) aims to provide its readers with the latest clinical and basic research, and informed opinions that shape today''s orthopedic practice, thereby providing an opportunity to practice evidence-based medicine. With contributions from leading clinicians and researchers around the world, we aim to be the premier journal providing an international perspective advancing knowledge of the musculoskeletal system. JCOT publishes content of value to both general orthopedic practitioners and specialists on all aspects of musculoskeletal research, diagnoses, and treatment. We accept following types of articles: • Original articles focusing on current clinical issues. • Review articles with learning value for professionals as well as students. • Research articles providing the latest in basic biological or engineering research on musculoskeletal diseases. • Regular columns by experts discussing issues affecting the field of orthopedics. • "Symposia" devoted to a single topic offering the general reader an overview of a field, but providing the specialist current in-depth information. • Video of any orthopedic surgery which is innovative and adds to present concepts. • Articles emphasizing or demonstrating a new clinical sign in the art of patient examination is also considered for publication. Contributions from anywhere in the world are welcome and considered on their merits.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信