TSH Receptor Antibody Test Utilization Patterns from a National Reference Laboratory: TRAb, TSI, or Both?

Heather A Nelson, Kelly Doyle, Joely A Straseski
{"title":"TSH Receptor Antibody Test Utilization Patterns from a National Reference Laboratory: TRAb, TSI, or Both?","authors":"Heather A Nelson, Kelly Doyle, Joely A Straseski","doi":"10.1210/clinem/dgaf330","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There are currently two classes of thyroid stimulating hormone receptor (TSHR) antibody assays, namely TSHR antibody (TRAb) assays and thyroid stimulating immunoglobulin (TSI) assays. Clinical guidelines do not currently specify appropriate use of TSHR autoantibody tests in the diagnosis of hyperthyroidism which may result in paired orders for both tests with the possibility of discordant results and excessive costs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Over 189,000 patient encounters with TRAb and TSI bioassay (TSI-BA) or TSI bridge immunoassay (TSI-Br) test orders were examined to assess the frequency of paired orders and qualitative agreement of TRAB/TSI. A chart review was performed on a subset of patients for clinical correlation. Lastly, a cost analysis was performed to estimate the financial burden of unnecessary paired testing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>TRAb and TSI were co-ordered on the same encounter in 14.3% of TRAb/TSI-BA orders and 17.4% of TRAb/TSI-Br orders. Qualitative comparison showed discordance in 12.5% (1,590) of TRAb and TSI-BA paired orders and 6.6% (1,149) of TRAb and TSI-Br paired orders. Based on patient FT4 and TSH concentrations and disease status, the TSI assays aligned better with hyperthyroidism and confirmed Graves' disease diagnoses. Paired orders resulted in a 31-325% increase in potentially unnecessary testing costs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We observed good clinical and analytical agreement between TRAb and TSI assays suggesting that paired orders for TRAb and TSI are redundant in the assessment of autoimmune-mediated hyperthyroidism. Use of a single test to assess TRAb would be appropriate in most scenarios and may lead to considerable savings of healthcare dollars.</p>","PeriodicalId":520805,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgaf330","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There are currently two classes of thyroid stimulating hormone receptor (TSHR) antibody assays, namely TSHR antibody (TRAb) assays and thyroid stimulating immunoglobulin (TSI) assays. Clinical guidelines do not currently specify appropriate use of TSHR autoantibody tests in the diagnosis of hyperthyroidism which may result in paired orders for both tests with the possibility of discordant results and excessive costs.

Methods: Over 189,000 patient encounters with TRAb and TSI bioassay (TSI-BA) or TSI bridge immunoassay (TSI-Br) test orders were examined to assess the frequency of paired orders and qualitative agreement of TRAB/TSI. A chart review was performed on a subset of patients for clinical correlation. Lastly, a cost analysis was performed to estimate the financial burden of unnecessary paired testing.

Results: TRAb and TSI were co-ordered on the same encounter in 14.3% of TRAb/TSI-BA orders and 17.4% of TRAb/TSI-Br orders. Qualitative comparison showed discordance in 12.5% (1,590) of TRAb and TSI-BA paired orders and 6.6% (1,149) of TRAb and TSI-Br paired orders. Based on patient FT4 and TSH concentrations and disease status, the TSI assays aligned better with hyperthyroidism and confirmed Graves' disease diagnoses. Paired orders resulted in a 31-325% increase in potentially unnecessary testing costs.

Conclusions: We observed good clinical and analytical agreement between TRAb and TSI assays suggesting that paired orders for TRAb and TSI are redundant in the assessment of autoimmune-mediated hyperthyroidism. Use of a single test to assess TRAb would be appropriate in most scenarios and may lead to considerable savings of healthcare dollars.

国家参考实验室TSH受体抗体测试使用模式:TRAb, TSI,还是两者都有?
背景:目前有两类促甲状腺激素受体(TSHR)抗体检测,即TSHR抗体(TRAb)检测和促甲状腺免疫球蛋白(TSI)检测。临床指南目前没有明确TSHR自身抗体测试在甲状腺功能亢进诊断中的适当使用,这可能导致两种测试的配对订单,结果可能不一致,成本过高。方法:对超过189,000例TRAb和TSI生物测定(TSI- ba)或TSI桥式免疫测定(TSI- br)试验单进行检查,以评估配对单的频率和TRAb /TSI的定性一致性。对一部分患者的临床相关性进行了图表回顾。最后,进行成本分析,以估计不必要的配对测试的财务负担。结果:14.3%的TRAb/TSI- ba和17.4%的TRAb/TSI- br在同一次相遇中共序。定性比较显示,12.5%(1590)的TRAb与TSI-BA配对序列不一致,6.6%(1149)的TRAb与TSI-Br配对序列不一致。基于患者FT4和TSH浓度和疾病状态,TSI检测更符合甲状腺功能亢进和Graves病的诊断。配对订单导致潜在不必要的检测成本增加31-325%。结论:我们观察到TRAb和TSI检测具有良好的临床和分析一致性,提示TRAb和TSI的配对顺序在评估自身免疫介导的甲亢时是多余的。在大多数情况下,使用单一测试来评估TRAb是合适的,并且可以节省大量医疗保健费用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信