Addressing underachievement in nursing students: the roles of practice assessors and supervisors.

Sarah Butler
{"title":"Addressing underachievement in nursing students: the roles of practice assessors and supervisors.","authors":"Sarah Butler","doi":"10.12968/bjon.2024.0379","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The roles of nursing practice assessors and supervisors are pivotal in guiding students through clinical practice, ensuring they attain the necessary competencies and professionalism to deliver safe and effective patient care. However, underachievement among nursing students, whether related to conduct or proficiency, poses challenges that require timely and structured interventions. This article explores the responsibilities of assessors and supervisors in identifying, supporting and, when necessary, failing underperforming students. It examines key factors contributing to underachievement, including personal, environmental and institutional influences, and highlights effective intervention strategies such as early identification, structured feedback and personalised development plans. Additionally, the article addresses the 'failure to fail' phenomenon, wherein assessors hesitate to fail students despite concerns about their competence, ultimately compromising patient safety and the integrity of the nursing profession. The discussion highlights the importance of robust training, emotional support and institutional backing for assessors to make objective, fair decisions while upholding professional standards. By fostering a supportive yet accountable educational environment, nursing educators, supervisors and assessors can ensure that graduates are well prepared to meet the demands of their profession.</p>","PeriodicalId":520014,"journal":{"name":"British journal of nursing (Mark Allen Publishing)","volume":"34 11","pages":"566-569"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of nursing (Mark Allen Publishing)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2024.0379","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The roles of nursing practice assessors and supervisors are pivotal in guiding students through clinical practice, ensuring they attain the necessary competencies and professionalism to deliver safe and effective patient care. However, underachievement among nursing students, whether related to conduct or proficiency, poses challenges that require timely and structured interventions. This article explores the responsibilities of assessors and supervisors in identifying, supporting and, when necessary, failing underperforming students. It examines key factors contributing to underachievement, including personal, environmental and institutional influences, and highlights effective intervention strategies such as early identification, structured feedback and personalised development plans. Additionally, the article addresses the 'failure to fail' phenomenon, wherein assessors hesitate to fail students despite concerns about their competence, ultimately compromising patient safety and the integrity of the nursing profession. The discussion highlights the importance of robust training, emotional support and institutional backing for assessors to make objective, fair decisions while upholding professional standards. By fostering a supportive yet accountable educational environment, nursing educators, supervisors and assessors can ensure that graduates are well prepared to meet the demands of their profession.

解决护理学生成绩不佳:实践评估者和监督者的角色。
护理实践评估员和监督员的角色在指导学生通过临床实践,确保他们获得必要的能力和专业精神,以提供安全有效的患者护理方面是至关重要的。然而,护理专业学生的成绩不佳,无论是与行为还是熟练程度有关,都需要及时和有组织的干预。本文探讨了评估员和监督员在识别、支持和必要时让表现不佳的学生失败方面的责任。它审查了导致成绩不佳的关键因素,包括个人、环境和制度影响,并强调了有效的干预策略,如早期识别、结构化反馈和个性化发展计划。此外,文章解决了“失败到失败”的现象,其中评估员不顾学生的能力而不愿让学生不及格,最终危及患者安全和护理专业的完整性。讨论强调了强有力的培训、情感支持和制度支持对评估人员做出客观、公平决策的重要性,同时坚持专业标准。通过培养一个支持性的、负责任的教育环境,护理教育工作者、主管和评估人员可以确保毕业生做好充分的准备,以满足他们的职业需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信