Outcome Determinant of Patients Following Microsurgical Clipping of Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms.

Asian journal of neurosurgery Pub Date : 2025-02-20 eCollection Date: 2025-06-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0045-1804529
Gopal R Sharma, Prasanna Karki, Sumit Joshi, Damber Bikram Shah, Prakash Paudel, Baburam Pokharel
{"title":"Outcome Determinant of Patients Following Microsurgical Clipping of Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms.","authors":"Gopal R Sharma, Prasanna Karki, Sumit Joshi, Damber Bikram Shah, Prakash Paudel, Baburam Pokharel","doi":"10.1055/s-0045-1804529","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives</b>  Numerous factors can influence patient outcomes following microsurgical clipping of intracranial aneurysms (IAs). Some unique factors, such as aneurysm surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic, also play a role. This study aims to evaluate outcomes in patients with ruptured IAs undergoing microsurgical clipping and identify predictors for both immediate and long-term prognosis. <b>Materials and Methods</b>  This is a retrospective study with prospectively collected data of 500 patients with ruptured aneurysms undergoing microsurgical clipping over a period of 10 years (April 2011-November 2022). The follow-up period ranged from 2 to 10 years, and clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS). Data were analyzed using STATA version 3.10. Logistic regression was used to calculate <i>p</i> -values, with a significance level of <i>p</i>  < 0.05. <b>Results</b>  Among 500 patients treated for ruptured IAs, 169 were males and 331 were females, with a median age of 53 years. Postoperative vasospasm was a major predictor of worse outcomes at discharge ( <i>p</i>  < 0.001), 6 months ( <i>p</i>  < 0.001), 1 year ( <i>p</i>  < 0.001), 5 years ( <i>p</i>  = 0.014), and 10 years ( <i>p</i>  = 0.006). Patients treated during the COVID-19 pandemic had worse outcomes at 6 months ( <i>p</i>  < 0.001) and 1 year ( <i>p</i>  = 0.001). <b>Conclusion</b>  Postoperative vasospasm, intraoperative rupture, and the COVID-19 pandemic were the most important predictors of worse outcomes. Factors such as age, hospital type, Miller Fisher grade, alcohol abuse, diabetes, aneurysm multiplicity, aneurysm size, neck size, ethnicity, hydrocephalus, brain retraction, and lamina terminalis fenestration did not significantly influence the outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":94300,"journal":{"name":"Asian journal of neurosurgery","volume":"20 2","pages":"301-313"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12136950/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian journal of neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0045-1804529","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives  Numerous factors can influence patient outcomes following microsurgical clipping of intracranial aneurysms (IAs). Some unique factors, such as aneurysm surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic, also play a role. This study aims to evaluate outcomes in patients with ruptured IAs undergoing microsurgical clipping and identify predictors for both immediate and long-term prognosis. Materials and Methods  This is a retrospective study with prospectively collected data of 500 patients with ruptured aneurysms undergoing microsurgical clipping over a period of 10 years (April 2011-November 2022). The follow-up period ranged from 2 to 10 years, and clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS). Data were analyzed using STATA version 3.10. Logistic regression was used to calculate p -values, with a significance level of p  < 0.05. Results  Among 500 patients treated for ruptured IAs, 169 were males and 331 were females, with a median age of 53 years. Postoperative vasospasm was a major predictor of worse outcomes at discharge ( p  < 0.001), 6 months ( p  < 0.001), 1 year ( p  < 0.001), 5 years ( p  = 0.014), and 10 years ( p  = 0.006). Patients treated during the COVID-19 pandemic had worse outcomes at 6 months ( p  < 0.001) and 1 year ( p  = 0.001). Conclusion  Postoperative vasospasm, intraoperative rupture, and the COVID-19 pandemic were the most important predictors of worse outcomes. Factors such as age, hospital type, Miller Fisher grade, alcohol abuse, diabetes, aneurysm multiplicity, aneurysm size, neck size, ethnicity, hydrocephalus, brain retraction, and lamina terminalis fenestration did not significantly influence the outcomes.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

颅内动脉瘤破裂显微手术夹闭后患者预后的决定因素。
目的影响显微手术夹闭颅内动脉瘤患者预后的因素很多。一些独特的因素,如COVID-19大流行期间的动脉瘤手术,也发挥了作用。本研究旨在评估接受显微外科夹持术的IAs破裂患者的预后,并确定近期和长期预后的预测因素。材料与方法回顾性研究,前瞻性收集10年间(2011年4月- 2022年11月)500例动脉瘤破裂患者的显微手术夹持资料。随访时间从2年到10年不等,临床结果采用格拉斯哥结果量表(GOS)进行评估。数据分析采用STATA 3.10版本。结果500例IAs破裂患者中,男性169例,女性331例,中位年龄53岁。术后血管痉挛是出院时预后较差的主要预测因素(p = 0.014)和10年(p = 0.006)。在COVID-19大流行期间接受治疗的患者在6个月时的预后较差(p p = 0.001)。结论术后血管痉挛、术中破裂和COVID-19大流行是预后较差的最重要预测因素。年龄、医院类型、Miller Fisher分级、酗酒、糖尿病、动脉瘤多样性、动脉瘤大小、颈部大小、种族、脑积水、脑后缩和终末板开窗等因素对结果没有显著影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信