Oral function in facial nerve palsy: A comparative analysis of flaccid and synkinetic palsy.

Megan Lai, Emma Charters, Tsu-Hui Low
{"title":"Oral function in facial nerve palsy: A comparative analysis of flaccid and synkinetic palsy.","authors":"Megan Lai, Emma Charters, Tsu-Hui Low","doi":"10.1016/j.bjps.2025.04.055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Facial nerve palsy (FNP) can have a profound impact on oral function and quality of life (QOL). However, the distinct challenges encountered by patients with flaccid compared with synkinetic facial movements have not been characterised. This study aimed to describe and compare speech, swallowing and QOL in patients with these 2 conditions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with lower motor neurone FNP were recruited from the Sydney Facial Nerve Service. Their oral competence was measured using clinician- and patient-rated outcome measures. This included a consonant analysis of a recorded reading sample and a subjective intelligibility rating by the clinician and patient and 2 validated questionnaires, the Speech Handicap Index (SHI) and Oral Competence Questionnaire (OCQ).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-five participants were enrolled in the study (n=16 intact facial nerve function, prior to facial nerve sacrifice surgery, n=31 synkinetic FNP and n=18 flaccid FNP). The flaccid FNP group presented with more speech errors within each consonant group (p<0.001), poorer intelligibility in clinician and patient ratings (p<0.001 and p=0.01, respectively) and in the OCQ responses (p=0.01). No significant difference was observed in the SHI between the synkinetic and flaccid groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Flaccid and synkinetic FNP are 2 distinct conditions, presenting with differing characteristics and requiring different treatment pathways. These findings suggest that patients with flaccid FNP present with poorer functional outcomes in swallowing and speech-related QOL.</p>","PeriodicalId":94104,"journal":{"name":"Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2025.04.055","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Facial nerve palsy (FNP) can have a profound impact on oral function and quality of life (QOL). However, the distinct challenges encountered by patients with flaccid compared with synkinetic facial movements have not been characterised. This study aimed to describe and compare speech, swallowing and QOL in patients with these 2 conditions.

Methods: Patients with lower motor neurone FNP were recruited from the Sydney Facial Nerve Service. Their oral competence was measured using clinician- and patient-rated outcome measures. This included a consonant analysis of a recorded reading sample and a subjective intelligibility rating by the clinician and patient and 2 validated questionnaires, the Speech Handicap Index (SHI) and Oral Competence Questionnaire (OCQ).

Results: Sixty-five participants were enrolled in the study (n=16 intact facial nerve function, prior to facial nerve sacrifice surgery, n=31 synkinetic FNP and n=18 flaccid FNP). The flaccid FNP group presented with more speech errors within each consonant group (p<0.001), poorer intelligibility in clinician and patient ratings (p<0.001 and p=0.01, respectively) and in the OCQ responses (p=0.01). No significant difference was observed in the SHI between the synkinetic and flaccid groups.

Conclusions: Flaccid and synkinetic FNP are 2 distinct conditions, presenting with differing characteristics and requiring different treatment pathways. These findings suggest that patients with flaccid FNP present with poorer functional outcomes in swallowing and speech-related QOL.

面神经麻痹的口腔功能:弛缓性和共动性麻痹的比较分析。
背景:面神经麻痹(FNP)对口腔功能和生活质量(QOL)有深远的影响。然而,与共动性面部运动相比,松弛患者所遇到的独特挑战尚未被表征。本研究旨在描述和比较这两种疾病患者的言语、吞咽和生活质量。方法:从悉尼面神经中心招募下运动神经元FNP患者。他们的口腔能力是用临床医生和患者评价的结果测量来测量的。这包括对记录阅读样本的辅音分析和临床医生和患者的主观可理解度评分,以及2份有效的问卷,言语障碍指数(SHI)和口语能力问卷(OCQ)。结果:65名参与者入组研究(n=16例完整面神经功能,面神经牺牲手术前,n=31例共动性FNP和n=18例弛缓性FNP)。结论:弛缓性和共动性FNP是两种不同的情况,表现出不同的特征,需要不同的治疗途径。这些发现表明,FNP弛缓性患者在吞咽和言语相关生活质量方面存在较差的功能结局。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信