Fractal geometry in wrist biomechanics: A preliminary study with implications for arthroplasty and surgery.

Lauren Gorelick, Amir Oron, Gil Gannot, Raphael Israeli
{"title":"Fractal geometry in wrist biomechanics: A preliminary study with implications for arthroplasty and surgery.","authors":"Lauren Gorelick, Amir Oron, Gil Gannot, Raphael Israeli","doi":"10.1016/j.hansur.2025.102203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Traditional biomechanical theories of wrist motion-such as row, column, and link joint models-offer limited explanations for the complex, multidirectional kinematics observed clinically. Emerging perspectives suggest fractal geometry, represented by the Golden Ratio (φ = 1.618), might underlie wrist biomechanics, providing a more comprehensive and clinically relevant framework.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This preliminary radiographic study aims to investigate whether wrist anthropometric ratios align significantly with fractal geometry principles, specifically evaluating their consistency with the Golden Ratio. Additionally, the study explores potential implications for wrist arthroplasty design and surgical practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional radiographic analysis was conducted on 210 healthy adult wrist radiographs. Anthropometric measurements included ratios between ulnar styloid, radial styloid, and the capitate bone, defined as A/B and (A + B)/C, and were statistically compared to the Golden Ratio. Statistical analyses incorporated tolerance intervals calculated under both normal and log-normal distribution assumptions, with a significance level set at P < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean anthropometric ratios closely matched the Golden Ratio, with an A/B mean of 1.615 (95% CI: 1.503-1.735) and an (A + B)/C mean of 1.620 (95% CI: 1.503-1.735). Tolerance intervals indicated that 95% of the study population fell within the fractal range (1.503-1.735), irrespective of age, gender, or laterality. High interobserver reliability (ICC = 0.91) further validated the consistency of these measurements.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings support the hypothesis that wrist biomechanics may be fundamentally organized by fractal geometry. These preliminary results challenge existing biomechanical paradigms and highlight potential applications in designing more biomechanically accurate wrist prostheses and enhancing surgical precision. Future research should assess clinical outcomes related to fractal-based prosthetic designs and explore fractal deviations as early indicators of wrist pathology.</p>","PeriodicalId":94023,"journal":{"name":"Hand surgery & rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"102203"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hand surgery & rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hansur.2025.102203","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Traditional biomechanical theories of wrist motion-such as row, column, and link joint models-offer limited explanations for the complex, multidirectional kinematics observed clinically. Emerging perspectives suggest fractal geometry, represented by the Golden Ratio (φ = 1.618), might underlie wrist biomechanics, providing a more comprehensive and clinically relevant framework.

Objectives: This preliminary radiographic study aims to investigate whether wrist anthropometric ratios align significantly with fractal geometry principles, specifically evaluating their consistency with the Golden Ratio. Additionally, the study explores potential implications for wrist arthroplasty design and surgical practice.

Methods: A cross-sectional radiographic analysis was conducted on 210 healthy adult wrist radiographs. Anthropometric measurements included ratios between ulnar styloid, radial styloid, and the capitate bone, defined as A/B and (A + B)/C, and were statistically compared to the Golden Ratio. Statistical analyses incorporated tolerance intervals calculated under both normal and log-normal distribution assumptions, with a significance level set at P < 0.05.

Results: Mean anthropometric ratios closely matched the Golden Ratio, with an A/B mean of 1.615 (95% CI: 1.503-1.735) and an (A + B)/C mean of 1.620 (95% CI: 1.503-1.735). Tolerance intervals indicated that 95% of the study population fell within the fractal range (1.503-1.735), irrespective of age, gender, or laterality. High interobserver reliability (ICC = 0.91) further validated the consistency of these measurements.

Conclusion: The findings support the hypothesis that wrist biomechanics may be fundamentally organized by fractal geometry. These preliminary results challenge existing biomechanical paradigms and highlight potential applications in designing more biomechanically accurate wrist prostheses and enhancing surgical precision. Future research should assess clinical outcomes related to fractal-based prosthetic designs and explore fractal deviations as early indicators of wrist pathology.

腕部生物力学中的分形几何:关节置换术和外科手术的初步研究。
背景:传统的腕部运动生物力学理论,如行、柱和链接关节模型,对临床观察到的复杂、多向的运动学解释有限。新兴观点认为,以黄金比例(φ = 1.618)为代表的分形几何可能是腕部生物力学的基础,提供了一个更全面和临床相关的框架。目的:这项初步的放射学研究旨在探讨腕部人体测量比例是否与分形几何原理显著一致,特别是评估其与黄金比例的一致性。此外,该研究还探讨了腕关节置换术设计和手术实践的潜在意义。方法:对210张健康成人腕关节x线片进行横断面放射学分析。人体测量包括尺骨茎突、桡骨茎突和头状骨的比值,定义为A/B和(A + B)/C,并与黄金比例进行统计比较。统计分析包括在正态分布和对数正态分布假设下计算的公差区间,显著性水平设为P。结果:平均人体测量比与黄金比例密切匹配,a /B平均值为1.615 (95% CI: 1.503-1.735), (a + B)/C平均值为1.620 (95% CI: 1.503-1.735)。容忍区间表明95%的研究人群落在分形范围内(1.503-1.735),与年龄、性别或偏侧性无关。高观察者间信度(ICC = 0.91)进一步验证了这些测量的一致性。结论:研究结果支持了腕部生物力学可能从根本上由分形几何组织的假设。这些初步结果挑战了现有的生物力学范式,并强调了在设计更精确的生物力学腕假体和提高手术精度方面的潜在应用。未来的研究应该评估与基于分形的假肢设计相关的临床结果,并探索分形偏差作为腕部病理的早期指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信