The Use of Non-i nvasive Biomarkers to Screen for Advanced Fibrosis Associated with Metabolic Dysfunction-associated Steatotic Liver Disease in People with Type 2 Diabetes: A Narrative Review.
David M Williams, Jagadish Nagaraj, Jeffrey W Stephens, Thinzar Min
{"title":"The Use of Non-i nvasive Biomarkers to Screen for Advanced Fibrosis Associated with Metabolic Dysfunction-associated Steatotic Liver Disease in People with Type 2 Diabetes: A Narrative Review.","authors":"David M Williams, Jagadish Nagaraj, Jeffrey W Stephens, Thinzar Min","doi":"10.17925/EE.2025.21.1.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is growing interest in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), given its increasing prevalence and our developing understanding of the disease. People living with type 2 diabetes or obesity have a greater risk of developing significant hepatic steatosis and a greater risk of more rapid progression to steatohepatitis, advanced hepatic fibrosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. As such, various international bodies now advocate for routine screening for MASLD-related hepatic fibrosis in people with such risk factors. This would permit earlier targeted lifestyle interventions and the use of pharmacotherapies, which may reverse earlier stages of MASLD-associated fibrosis. This may improve both liver-related and cardiovascular outcomes in these higher-risk groups. Nonetheless, the identification of MASLD-related hepatic fibrosis is frequently limited to liver enzyme tests, given the lack of a systematic approach to investigation and screening. In this article, we discuss the potential to screen for advanced fibrosis in people with MASLD using various blood-based biomarkers, such as the Fibrosis-4 score, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease fibrosis score and enhanced liver fibrosis test, amongst other available patented and non-patented tests. We discuss the relative benefits and limitations of each and the potential for future research in this evolving area of clinical interest.</p>","PeriodicalId":75231,"journal":{"name":"TouchREVIEWS in endocrinology","volume":"21 1","pages":"24-31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12140637/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TouchREVIEWS in endocrinology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17925/EE.2025.21.1.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
There is growing interest in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), given its increasing prevalence and our developing understanding of the disease. People living with type 2 diabetes or obesity have a greater risk of developing significant hepatic steatosis and a greater risk of more rapid progression to steatohepatitis, advanced hepatic fibrosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. As such, various international bodies now advocate for routine screening for MASLD-related hepatic fibrosis in people with such risk factors. This would permit earlier targeted lifestyle interventions and the use of pharmacotherapies, which may reverse earlier stages of MASLD-associated fibrosis. This may improve both liver-related and cardiovascular outcomes in these higher-risk groups. Nonetheless, the identification of MASLD-related hepatic fibrosis is frequently limited to liver enzyme tests, given the lack of a systematic approach to investigation and screening. In this article, we discuss the potential to screen for advanced fibrosis in people with MASLD using various blood-based biomarkers, such as the Fibrosis-4 score, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease fibrosis score and enhanced liver fibrosis test, amongst other available patented and non-patented tests. We discuss the relative benefits and limitations of each and the potential for future research in this evolving area of clinical interest.