Stakeholder Perspectives on the Meaningful Integration of Clinical Informatics Interventions Using Patient-Reported Outcomes in Healthcare.

ACI open Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-17 DOI:10.1055/a-2461-3027
David Russell, Yashika Sharma, Andrew P Ambrosy, Kelly Axsom, Janejira J Chaiyasit, Margaret O Cuomo, Christi Deaton, Anne J Goldberg, Parag Goyal, Angel Guan, Fernanda C G Polubriaginof, Lucy McGurk, Alexander T Sandhu, John A Spertus, Meghan Reading Turchioe, David K Vawdrey, Ruth Masterson Creber
{"title":"Stakeholder Perspectives on the Meaningful Integration of Clinical Informatics Interventions Using Patient-Reported Outcomes in Healthcare.","authors":"David Russell, Yashika Sharma, Andrew P Ambrosy, Kelly Axsom, Janejira J Chaiyasit, Margaret O Cuomo, Christi Deaton, Anne J Goldberg, Parag Goyal, Angel Guan, Fernanda C G Polubriaginof, Lucy McGurk, Alexander T Sandhu, John A Spertus, Meghan Reading Turchioe, David K Vawdrey, Ruth Masterson Creber","doi":"10.1055/a-2461-3027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) capture where patients are on their disease trajectory and can identify changes in health status from their perspective.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study applied the equity and sustainability-informed RE-AIM framework (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance) to gain insights into clinical informatics interventions for collection and use of PROs across health systems.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 14 health informatics and clinical professionals were interviewed about the development and use of PROs within their health systems and individual practices. Directed content analysis was performed to highlight patterns, similarities, and differences in stakeholder perspectives across RE-AIM domains.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The reach of clinical informatics interventions using PROs varied across clinical practices and settings based upon institutional commitment and support, integration of clinical information systems, and engagement with patients and families. Although interventions using PROs were viewed as effective for enabling focused conversations with patients and facilitating shared decision-making, barriers to adoption included licensing requirements associated with PRO instruments, lack of incentives for their use, limited integration of PRO results into electronic medical record systems, and poor support for patients with low technology and/or health literacy. Implementation of interventions using PROs was facilitated through training and support staff who aided clinicians with clinical workflow integration, availability of questionnaires in multiple languages, identifying thresholds and strategies for action, and presenting interpretable visualizations showing changes over time alongside significant clinical events. Maintenance of interventions using PROs was enabled through multimodal data collection approaches and data governance groups that evaluated organizational requests to track new measures.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Initiatives to increase the reach of clinical informatics interventions using PROs will require health system investments into medical record system integration, education, and implementation support for clinicians and patients, and efforts to reach patient populations with language barriers or limited technology literacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":72041,"journal":{"name":"ACI open","volume":"8 2","pages":"e79-e88"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12143486/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACI open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2461-3027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) capture where patients are on their disease trajectory and can identify changes in health status from their perspective.

Objectives: This study applied the equity and sustainability-informed RE-AIM framework (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance) to gain insights into clinical informatics interventions for collection and use of PROs across health systems.

Methods: A total of 14 health informatics and clinical professionals were interviewed about the development and use of PROs within their health systems and individual practices. Directed content analysis was performed to highlight patterns, similarities, and differences in stakeholder perspectives across RE-AIM domains.

Results: The reach of clinical informatics interventions using PROs varied across clinical practices and settings based upon institutional commitment and support, integration of clinical information systems, and engagement with patients and families. Although interventions using PROs were viewed as effective for enabling focused conversations with patients and facilitating shared decision-making, barriers to adoption included licensing requirements associated with PRO instruments, lack of incentives for their use, limited integration of PRO results into electronic medical record systems, and poor support for patients with low technology and/or health literacy. Implementation of interventions using PROs was facilitated through training and support staff who aided clinicians with clinical workflow integration, availability of questionnaires in multiple languages, identifying thresholds and strategies for action, and presenting interpretable visualizations showing changes over time alongside significant clinical events. Maintenance of interventions using PROs was enabled through multimodal data collection approaches and data governance groups that evaluated organizational requests to track new measures.

Conclusion: Initiatives to increase the reach of clinical informatics interventions using PROs will require health system investments into medical record system integration, education, and implementation support for clinicians and patients, and efforts to reach patient populations with language barriers or limited technology literacy.

利益相关者对临床信息学干预在医疗保健中使用患者报告结果的有意义整合的观点。
背景:患者报告的转归(pro)捕获患者在其疾病轨迹上的位置,并可以从他们的角度确定健康状况的变化。目的:本研究应用公平和可持续性的RE-AIM框架(覆盖范围、有效性、采用、实施和维护),以深入了解卫生系统中收集和使用PROs的临床信息学干预措施。方法:对14名卫生信息学和临床专业人员进行访谈,了解其卫生系统和个人实践中pro的开发和使用情况。执行定向内容分析以突出RE-AIM领域中涉众观点中的模式、相似点和不同点。结果:基于机构的承诺和支持、临床信息系统的整合以及患者和家庭的参与,使用PROs的临床信息学干预的范围在临床实践和环境中有所不同。尽管使用PRO的干预措施被认为对与患者进行重点对话和促进共同决策是有效的,但采用PRO的障碍包括与PRO仪器相关的许可要求、对其使用缺乏激励、将PRO结果有限地整合到电子病历系统中,以及对技术和/或健康素养较低的患者的支持不足。通过培训和支持工作人员协助临床医生整合临床工作流程,提供多种语言的问卷调查,确定阈值和行动策略,并呈现可解释的可视化显示随时间的变化以及重大临床事件,促进了使用pro的干预措施的实施。通过多模式数据收集方法和数据治理小组评估组织跟踪新措施的请求,可以使用pro维护干预措施。结论:使用pro增加临床信息学干预范围的举措将需要卫生系统投资于病历系统集成、教育和对临床医生和患者的实施支持,并努力接触有语言障碍或技术素养有限的患者群体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信