Postoperative vision loss and visual disturbances in a Canadian provincial administrative data repository.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Michael T Paillé, Frank Stockl, Thomas C Mutter
{"title":"Postoperative vision loss and visual disturbances in a Canadian provincial administrative data repository.","authors":"Michael T Paillé, Frank Stockl, Thomas C Mutter","doi":"10.1007/s12630-025-02974-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Population-based, health administrative database analyses of postoperative vision loss (POVL) have primarily examined International Classification of Diseases (ICD) diagnosis codes for ischemic optic neuropathy (ION) and retinal artery occlusion (RAO) after cardiac and spine surgery. Other nonspecific diagnosis codes describing significant vision loss have been mostly overlooked. We sought to investigate their contribution to the broader epidemiology of POVL after a variety of surgical procedures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using administrative data from Manitoba, Canada, we identified hospital admissions where patients underwent spine, cardiac, and other common inpatient and ambulatory surgeries between 1987 and 2017. To avoid misclassifying pre-existing vision loss as POVL, we excluded admissions where patients had ICD diagnosis codes suggestive of pre-existing vision loss in at least 5 years of preoperative data. Postoperative vision loss outcomes included specific diagnosis codes, such as RAO and ION, and nonspecific diagnosis codes for blindness, visual disturbances, and visual field defects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We excluded 158,730 admissions for suspected pre-existing vision loss, including 345 admissions with POVL diagnosis codes. We included 170 POVL cases in 596,241 admissions. Nonspecific diagnosis codes accounted for 140 (82%) cases and were associated with risk factors previously reported for ION, RAO, and cortical blindness. Overall, 24 (14%) cases were RAOs, and privacy restrictions precluded analysis of the remaining 6 (4%) cases. The incidence of RAO and nonspecific diagnosis codes was highest after cardiac and spine surgery. Still, other types of surgery accounted for 87 (62%) of the nonspecific diagnosis code cases and 11 (46%) of the RAO cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In surgical patients without a history of vision loss, new diagnosis codes for blindness, visual field defects, and visual disturbances other than ION and RAO may represent an important but overlooked aspect of POVL epidemiology.</p>","PeriodicalId":56145,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Anesthesia-Journal Canadien D Anesthesie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Anesthesia-Journal Canadien D Anesthesie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-025-02974-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Population-based, health administrative database analyses of postoperative vision loss (POVL) have primarily examined International Classification of Diseases (ICD) diagnosis codes for ischemic optic neuropathy (ION) and retinal artery occlusion (RAO) after cardiac and spine surgery. Other nonspecific diagnosis codes describing significant vision loss have been mostly overlooked. We sought to investigate their contribution to the broader epidemiology of POVL after a variety of surgical procedures.

Methods: Using administrative data from Manitoba, Canada, we identified hospital admissions where patients underwent spine, cardiac, and other common inpatient and ambulatory surgeries between 1987 and 2017. To avoid misclassifying pre-existing vision loss as POVL, we excluded admissions where patients had ICD diagnosis codes suggestive of pre-existing vision loss in at least 5 years of preoperative data. Postoperative vision loss outcomes included specific diagnosis codes, such as RAO and ION, and nonspecific diagnosis codes for blindness, visual disturbances, and visual field defects.

Results: We excluded 158,730 admissions for suspected pre-existing vision loss, including 345 admissions with POVL diagnosis codes. We included 170 POVL cases in 596,241 admissions. Nonspecific diagnosis codes accounted for 140 (82%) cases and were associated with risk factors previously reported for ION, RAO, and cortical blindness. Overall, 24 (14%) cases were RAOs, and privacy restrictions precluded analysis of the remaining 6 (4%) cases. The incidence of RAO and nonspecific diagnosis codes was highest after cardiac and spine surgery. Still, other types of surgery accounted for 87 (62%) of the nonspecific diagnosis code cases and 11 (46%) of the RAO cases.

Conclusion: In surgical patients without a history of vision loss, new diagnosis codes for blindness, visual field defects, and visual disturbances other than ION and RAO may represent an important but overlooked aspect of POVL epidemiology.

加拿大省级行政数据库术后视力丧失和视力障碍。
目的:以人群为基础,对术后视力丧失(POVL)的卫生管理数据库进行分析,主要检查了心脏和脊柱手术后缺血性视神经病变(ION)和视网膜动脉闭塞(RAO)的国际疾病分类(ICD)诊断代码。其他描述严重视力丧失的非特异性诊断代码大多被忽视了。我们试图调查它们对各种外科手术后POVL更广泛的流行病学的贡献。方法:利用加拿大马尼托巴省的行政数据,我们确定了1987年至2017年期间接受脊柱、心脏和其他常见住院和门诊手术的患者入院情况。为了避免将已有的视力丧失错误地分类为POVL,我们排除了术前至少5年的ICD诊断代码提示已有视力丧失的患者。术后视力丧失结果包括特异性诊断代码,如RAO和ION,以及失明、视力障碍和视野缺陷的非特异性诊断代码。结果:我们排除了158,730例疑似既往视力丧失的入院患者,其中345例就诊患者的诊断代码为POVL。我们在596,241例入院患者中纳入了170例POVL病例。非特异性诊断代码占140例(82%),并与先前报道的ION、RAO和皮质性失明的危险因素相关。总体而言,24例(14%)为RAOs,由于隐私限制,无法对其余6例(4%)进行分析。在心脏和脊柱手术后,RAO和非特异性诊断代码的发生率最高。然而,其他类型的手术占非特异性诊断代码病例的87例(62%)和RAO病例的11例(46%)。结论:在没有视力丧失史的手术患者中,除了ION和RAO之外,新的失明、视野缺损和视力障碍诊断代码可能是POVL流行病学的一个重要但被忽视的方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
161
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Canadian Journal of Anesthesia (the Journal) is owned by the Canadian Anesthesiologists’ Society and is published by Springer Science + Business Media, LLM (New York). From the first year of publication in 1954, the international exposure of the Journal has broadened considerably, with articles now received from over 50 countries. The Journal is published monthly, and has an impact Factor (mean journal citation frequency) of 2.127 (in 2012). Article types consist of invited editorials, reports of original investigations (clinical and basic sciences articles), case reports/case series, review articles, systematic reviews, accredited continuing professional development (CPD) modules, and Letters to the Editor. The editorial content, according to the mission statement, spans the fields of anesthesia, acute and chronic pain, perioperative medicine and critical care. In addition, the Journal publishes practice guidelines and standards articles relevant to clinicians. Articles are published either in English or in French, according to the language of submission.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信