Staff Experiences With Implementation of the Referral Coordination Initiative.

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Ashley C Mog, Anna Woolery, Kelty Fehling, Makkawi Makkawi, Colin I O'Donnell, Edward O'Brien, Paul L Hebert, Brian N Palen, David H Au, Lisa M Arfons, David Winchester, Lucas M Donovan
{"title":"Staff Experiences With Implementation of the Referral Coordination Initiative.","authors":"Ashley C Mog, Anna Woolery, Kelty Fehling, Makkawi Makkawi, Colin I O'Donnell, Edward O'Brien, Paul L Hebert, Brian N Palen, David H Au, Lisa M Arfons, David Winchester, Lucas M Donovan","doi":"10.1111/1475-6773.14654","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To understand VHA staff experiences with the referral coordination initiative (RCI) following nationwide dissemination.</p><p><strong>Study setting and design: </strong>RCI uses a team-based approach to improve the timeliness, efficiency, and patient-centeredness of specialty care referrals, while redistributing the time-intensive triage tasks from specialist providers to nurses. To assess frontline experiences with RCI, we purposively sampled four VHA sites for qualitative interviews, ensuring variability around the use of nurses in triage and the organization of scheduling staff within three high-volume specialties: cardiology, gastroenterology, and pulmonary. From May to December 2023, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 68 VHA staff members who engaged in various aspects of referral coordination, including interviews with nurses, schedulers, specialists, and referring providers.</p><p><strong>Data sources and analytic sample: </strong>We asked staff about challenges and facilitators to RCI implementation and maintenance. If certain RCI elements (e.g., nurse triage) were not implemented, we asked about anticipated challenges and facilitators. We analyzed qualitative data concurrently with data collection using a rapid matrix analysis approach.</p><p><strong>Principal findings: </strong>Staff expressed varying perceptions around the effects of RCI and its impacts on specialist burden and clinic staffing. We identified challenges to RCI, including (1) inconsistent staff perceptions around program goals, (2) mixed perceptions around the appropriateness of nurse triage, (3) lack of clear specialty-specific triage guidelines, and (4) limited coordination with schedulers. Key facilitators of RCI included (1) leveraging existing relationships and nurses with existing specialty-specific expertise, and (2) building relationships and clear triage guidelines with specialties.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>To streamline patient-centered referrals, health systems should foster working relationships between referral management teams and specialties. While nurse-led triage can improve efficiency, concerted efforts are necessary to train nurses and develop clear triage criteria.</p>","PeriodicalId":55065,"journal":{"name":"Health Services Research","volume":" ","pages":"e14654"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.14654","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To understand VHA staff experiences with the referral coordination initiative (RCI) following nationwide dissemination.

Study setting and design: RCI uses a team-based approach to improve the timeliness, efficiency, and patient-centeredness of specialty care referrals, while redistributing the time-intensive triage tasks from specialist providers to nurses. To assess frontline experiences with RCI, we purposively sampled four VHA sites for qualitative interviews, ensuring variability around the use of nurses in triage and the organization of scheduling staff within three high-volume specialties: cardiology, gastroenterology, and pulmonary. From May to December 2023, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 68 VHA staff members who engaged in various aspects of referral coordination, including interviews with nurses, schedulers, specialists, and referring providers.

Data sources and analytic sample: We asked staff about challenges and facilitators to RCI implementation and maintenance. If certain RCI elements (e.g., nurse triage) were not implemented, we asked about anticipated challenges and facilitators. We analyzed qualitative data concurrently with data collection using a rapid matrix analysis approach.

Principal findings: Staff expressed varying perceptions around the effects of RCI and its impacts on specialist burden and clinic staffing. We identified challenges to RCI, including (1) inconsistent staff perceptions around program goals, (2) mixed perceptions around the appropriateness of nurse triage, (3) lack of clear specialty-specific triage guidelines, and (4) limited coordination with schedulers. Key facilitators of RCI included (1) leveraging existing relationships and nurses with existing specialty-specific expertise, and (2) building relationships and clear triage guidelines with specialties.

Conclusions: To streamline patient-centered referrals, health systems should foster working relationships between referral management teams and specialties. While nurse-led triage can improve efficiency, concerted efforts are necessary to train nurses and develop clear triage criteria.

工作人员实施转介协调倡议的经验。
目的:了解VHA工作人员在全国推广转诊协调倡议(RCI)后的经验。研究设置和设计:RCI采用基于团队的方法来提高专科护理转诊的及时性、效率和以患者为中心,同时将耗时的分诊任务从专科医生重新分配给护士。为了评估RCI的一线经验,我们有目的地对四个VHA站点进行了定性访谈,以确保在三个大容量专业(心脏病学、胃肠病学和肺病学)中,护士在分诊中使用的可变性和安排人员的组织。在2023年5月至12月期间,我们对68名从事转诊协调工作的VHA工作人员进行了半结构化访谈,包括与护士、调班员、专家和转诊提供者的访谈。数据源和分析样本:我们向员工询问了RCI实现和维护的挑战和促进因素。如果某些RCI要素(如护士分诊)没有实施,我们询问了预期的挑战和促进因素。我们分析定性数据与数据收集同时使用快速矩阵分析方法。主要发现:工作人员对RCI的影响及其对专家负担和诊所人员配备的影响表达了不同的看法。我们确定了RCI面临的挑战,包括:(1)员工对项目目标的看法不一致,(2)对护士分诊适当性的看法不一,(3)缺乏明确的专业分诊指南,以及(4)与调度员的协调有限。RCI的主要促进因素包括:(1)利用现有的关系和具有现有专业知识的护士,以及(2)与专业建立关系和明确的分诊指南。结论:为了简化以患者为中心的转诊,卫生系统应促进转诊管理团队和专科之间的工作关系。虽然护士主导的分诊可以提高效率,但必须共同努力培训护士并制定明确的分诊标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Services Research
Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
5.90%
发文量
193
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Services Research (HSR) is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal that provides researchers and public and private policymakers with the latest research findings, methods, and concepts related to the financing, organization, delivery, evaluation, and outcomes of health services. Rated as one of the top journals in the fields of health policy and services and health care administration, HSR publishes outstanding articles reporting the findings of original investigations that expand knowledge and understanding of the wide-ranging field of health care and that will help to improve the health of individuals and communities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信