Chronic lower back pain effects of music on fluoroscopic guided (CLEF) interventional pain procedures: a randomized controlled trial.

IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Heather Ann Columbano, David S Shbeeb, Evan D Youshock, R Miller Ligon, Anthony A Wachnik, Greg Russell, Brandon L Williams, Jessica Meister-Berger, Naucika DeSouza, Robert W Hurley
{"title":"Chronic lower back pain effects of music on fluoroscopic guided (CLEF) interventional pain procedures: a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Heather Ann Columbano, David S Shbeeb, Evan D Youshock, R Miller Ligon, Anthony A Wachnik, Greg Russell, Brandon L Williams, Jessica Meister-Berger, Naucika DeSouza, Robert W Hurley","doi":"10.1136/rapm-2024-106250","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Music medicine has shown promise in reducing anxiety and pain during medical procedures, but its effects during interventional pain procedures without sedation remain unexplored. Although previous studies have examined music medicine with procedural sedation, to our knowledge, no published research has yet explored music medicine during procedures without sedation in the chronic pain population, underscoring the novelty of our investigation. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of music medicine on pain intensity, unpleasantness, and anxiety during lumbar medial branch blocks (LMBB) performed without sedation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective, randomized controlled trial included 150 patients undergoing first-time LMBB. Participants were randomized to either a music medicine group (n=74) or a control group (n=76). Primary outcomes were changes in pain scores before and after the procedure. Secondary outcomes included changes in patient anxiety, satisfaction, hemodynamic parameters, pain catastrophizing, and progression to radiofrequency ablation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences in postprocedure pain intensity (p=0.32) or unpleasantness (p=0.4) between groups. However, the music medicine group showed a significant reduction in anxiety scores (p=0.049), particularly in patients with higher baseline Pain Catastrophizing Scale scores. No significant differences were observed in hemodynamic parameters, patient satisfaction, or desire for repeat procedures between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While music medicine during LMBB did not significantly impact pain intensity or unpleasantness, it demonstrated a notable reduction in patient anxiety, especially in those with higher pain catastrophizing tendencies. These findings suggest that music medicine may be a valuable, nonpharmacological intervention for managing anxiety during interventional pain procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":54503,"journal":{"name":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2024-106250","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Music medicine has shown promise in reducing anxiety and pain during medical procedures, but its effects during interventional pain procedures without sedation remain unexplored. Although previous studies have examined music medicine with procedural sedation, to our knowledge, no published research has yet explored music medicine during procedures without sedation in the chronic pain population, underscoring the novelty of our investigation. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of music medicine on pain intensity, unpleasantness, and anxiety during lumbar medial branch blocks (LMBB) performed without sedation.

Methods: This prospective, randomized controlled trial included 150 patients undergoing first-time LMBB. Participants were randomized to either a music medicine group (n=74) or a control group (n=76). Primary outcomes were changes in pain scores before and after the procedure. Secondary outcomes included changes in patient anxiety, satisfaction, hemodynamic parameters, pain catastrophizing, and progression to radiofrequency ablation.

Results: There were no significant differences in postprocedure pain intensity (p=0.32) or unpleasantness (p=0.4) between groups. However, the music medicine group showed a significant reduction in anxiety scores (p=0.049), particularly in patients with higher baseline Pain Catastrophizing Scale scores. No significant differences were observed in hemodynamic parameters, patient satisfaction, or desire for repeat procedures between groups.

Conclusions: While music medicine during LMBB did not significantly impact pain intensity or unpleasantness, it demonstrated a notable reduction in patient anxiety, especially in those with higher pain catastrophizing tendencies. These findings suggest that music medicine may be a valuable, nonpharmacological intervention for managing anxiety during interventional pain procedures.

慢性腰痛音乐对透视引导(CLEF)介入疼痛治疗的影响:一项随机对照试验。
音乐医学在医疗过程中显示出减少焦虑和疼痛的希望,但在没有镇静的介入性疼痛过程中其效果仍未被探索。虽然以前的研究已经检查了音乐药物与程序镇静,据我们所知,还没有发表的研究探索音乐药物在慢性疼痛人群的程序中没有镇静,强调我们的调查的新颖性。本研究旨在评估音乐药物对腰内侧支阻滞(LMBB)期间疼痛强度、不愉快和焦虑的影响。方法:这项前瞻性、随机对照试验包括150例首次行LMBB的患者。参与者被随机分为音乐医学组(n=74)和对照组(n=76)。主要结果是手术前后疼痛评分的变化。次要结局包括患者焦虑、满意度、血流动力学参数、疼痛灾难性和射频消融进展的变化。结果:两组患者术后疼痛强度(p=0.32)和不愉快程度(p=0.4)差异无统计学意义。然而,音乐医学组的焦虑得分显著降低(p=0.049),特别是在基线疼痛灾难量表得分较高的患者中。两组之间在血流动力学参数、患者满意度或重复手术的意愿方面没有观察到显著差异。结论:虽然音乐治疗在LMBB期间对疼痛强度或不愉快没有显著影响,但它显着降低了患者的焦虑,特别是对那些具有较高疼痛灾难倾向的患者。这些发现表明,音乐医学可能是一种有价值的、非药物干预治疗介入性疼痛过程中的焦虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
175
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, the official publication of the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (ASRA), is a monthly journal that publishes peer-reviewed scientific and clinical studies to advance the understanding and clinical application of regional techniques for surgical anesthesia and postoperative analgesia. Coverage includes intraoperative regional techniques, perioperative pain, chronic pain, obstetric anesthesia, pediatric anesthesia, outcome studies, and complications. Published for over thirty years, this respected journal also serves as the official publication of the European Society of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy (ESRA), the Asian and Oceanic Society of Regional Anesthesia (AOSRA), the Latin American Society of Regional Anesthesia (LASRA), the African Society for Regional Anesthesia (AFSRA), and the Academy of Regional Anaesthesia of India (AORA).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信