Estimation of tumor coverage after RF ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma using single 2D image slices.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Nicole Varble, Ming Li, Laetitia Saccenti, Tabea Borde, Antonio Arrichiello, Anna Christou, Katerina Lee, Lindsey Hazen, Sheng Xu, Riccardo Lencioni, Bradford J Wood
{"title":"Estimation of tumor coverage after RF ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma using single 2D image slices.","authors":"Nicole Varble, Ming Li, Laetitia Saccenti, Tabea Borde, Antonio Arrichiello, Anna Christou, Katerina Lee, Lindsey Hazen, Sheng Xu, Riccardo Lencioni, Bradford J Wood","doi":"10.1007/s11548-025-03423-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the technical success of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), an artificial intelligence (AI) model was developed to estimate the tumor coverage without the need for segmentation or registration tools.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A secondary retrospective analysis of 550 patients in the multicenter and multinational OPTIMA trial (3-7 cm solidary HCC lesions, randomized to RFA or RFA + LTLD) identified 182 patients with well-defined pre-RFA tumor and 1-month post-RFA devascularized ablation zones on enhanced CT. The ground-truth, or percent tumor coverage, was determined based on the result of semi-automatic 3D tumor and ablation zone segmentation and elastic registration. The isocenter of the tumor and ablation was isolated on 2D axial CT images. Feature extraction was performed, and classification and linear regression models were built. Images were augmented, and 728 image pairs were used for training and testing. The estimated percent tumor coverage using the models was compared to ground-truth. Validation was performed on eight patient cases from a separate institution, where RFA was performed, and pre- and post-ablation images were collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In testing cohorts, the best model accuracy was with classification and moderate data augmentation (AUC = 0.86, TPR = 0.59, and TNR = 0.89, accuracy = 69%) and regression with random forest (RMSE = 12.6%, MAE = 9.8%). Validation in a separate institution did not achieve accuracy greater than random estimation. Visual review of training cases suggests that poor tumor coverage may be a result of atypical ablation zone shrinkage 1 month post-RFA, which may not be reflected in clinical utilization.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>An AI model that uses 2D images at the center of the tumor and 1 month post-ablation can accurately estimate ablation tumor coverage. In separate validation cohorts, translation could be challenging.</p>","PeriodicalId":51251,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-025-03423-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the technical success of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), an artificial intelligence (AI) model was developed to estimate the tumor coverage without the need for segmentation or registration tools.

Methods: A secondary retrospective analysis of 550 patients in the multicenter and multinational OPTIMA trial (3-7 cm solidary HCC lesions, randomized to RFA or RFA + LTLD) identified 182 patients with well-defined pre-RFA tumor and 1-month post-RFA devascularized ablation zones on enhanced CT. The ground-truth, or percent tumor coverage, was determined based on the result of semi-automatic 3D tumor and ablation zone segmentation and elastic registration. The isocenter of the tumor and ablation was isolated on 2D axial CT images. Feature extraction was performed, and classification and linear regression models were built. Images were augmented, and 728 image pairs were used for training and testing. The estimated percent tumor coverage using the models was compared to ground-truth. Validation was performed on eight patient cases from a separate institution, where RFA was performed, and pre- and post-ablation images were collected.

Results: In testing cohorts, the best model accuracy was with classification and moderate data augmentation (AUC = 0.86, TPR = 0.59, and TNR = 0.89, accuracy = 69%) and regression with random forest (RMSE = 12.6%, MAE = 9.8%). Validation in a separate institution did not achieve accuracy greater than random estimation. Visual review of training cases suggests that poor tumor coverage may be a result of atypical ablation zone shrinkage 1 month post-RFA, which may not be reflected in clinical utilization.

Conclusion: An AI model that uses 2D images at the center of the tumor and 1 month post-ablation can accurately estimate ablation tumor coverage. In separate validation cohorts, translation could be challenging.

利用单张二维图像切片估计肝癌射频消融后肿瘤覆盖范围。
目的:为了评估射频消融(RFA)在肝细胞癌(HCC)患者中的技术成功,开发了一种人工智能(AI)模型来估计肿瘤覆盖范围,而不需要分割或注册工具。方法:在多中心和多国的OPTIMA试验中,对550例患者(3-7厘米的连体性HCC病变,随机分为RFA或RFA + LTLD)进行二次回顾性分析,发现182例患者在增强CT上有明确的RFA前肿瘤和RFA后1个月的断流消融区。根据半自动三维肿瘤和消融区分割和弹性配准的结果确定基础真相或肿瘤覆盖率百分比。在二维轴位CT图像上分离肿瘤和消融的等中心。进行特征提取,建立分类模型和线性回归模型。对图像进行增强,使用728对图像进行训练和测试。使用模型估计的肿瘤覆盖率百分比与基本事实进行了比较。对来自一个独立机构的8例患者进行验证,在那里进行RFA,并收集消融前和消融后的图像。结果:在检验队列中,采用分类和适度数据增强(AUC = 0.86, TPR = 0.59, TNR = 0.89,准确率= 69%)和随机森林回归(RMSE = 12.6%, MAE = 9.8%)的模型准确率最高。在一个单独的机构验证没有达到比随机估计更高的准确性。训练病例的目视回顾表明,肿瘤覆盖率低可能是rfa后1个月非典型消融区缩小的结果,这可能没有反映在临床应用中。结论:人工智能模型利用肿瘤中心和消融后1个月的二维图像可以准确估计消融后肿瘤的覆盖范围。在单独的验证队列中,翻译可能具有挑战性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL-RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
243
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal for Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery (IJCARS) is a peer-reviewed journal that provides a platform for closing the gap between medical and technical disciplines, and encourages interdisciplinary research and development activities in an international environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信