Automation of Anti-Drug Antibody Enrichment Using Streptavidin PhyTip® Columns for Sample Pretreatment in an Immunogenicity Assay.

IF 5 3区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Michael Luong, Minlei Zhang, Ihor Djura, Ying Wang, Alison Joyce
{"title":"Automation of Anti-Drug Antibody Enrichment Using Streptavidin PhyTip® Columns for Sample Pretreatment in an Immunogenicity Assay.","authors":"Michael Luong, Minlei Zhang, Ihor Djura, Ying Wang, Alison Joyce","doi":"10.1208/s12248-025-01092-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The administration of biotherapeutics has the potential to induce potent immune responses, including the induction of anti-drug antibodies (ADA) (1). Detection and characterization of ADA in clinical trials is an important component of a comprehensive immunogenicity program (2). ADA testing is mostly accomplished with ligand-binding assays (LBA). While LBA can be robust and specific, they are susceptible to various sources of interference (3). Of particular concern, interference from residual drug present in patient samples may lead to loss of ADA detection, producing false negative results. To mitigate drug interference, sample pretreatment procedures have been developed to enrich ADA from samples with high drug concentrations (4, 5). The pretreatment procedures can vary considerably but typically involve an initial step to liberate ADA from ADA-drug complexes and a subsequent step to affinity capture ADA and acid elute for detection. While these procedures can be highly effective, they have certain drawbacks when performed manually. First, the procedures are time-consuming and require near constant attention. Second, because of the manual workflow, the procedures can produce variable results between experiments and between different analysts with negative consequences for assay robustness. To address these drawbacks, we developed an automated procedure to enrich ADA by leveraging dual flow chromatography (DFC) and Streptavidin PhyTip® columns on a liquid-handling system (6). The enriched ADA were then tested in an LBA to evaluate the effectiveness of the automated enrichment procedure.</p>","PeriodicalId":50934,"journal":{"name":"AAPS Journal","volume":"27 4","pages":"108"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AAPS Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1208/s12248-025-01092-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The administration of biotherapeutics has the potential to induce potent immune responses, including the induction of anti-drug antibodies (ADA) (1). Detection and characterization of ADA in clinical trials is an important component of a comprehensive immunogenicity program (2). ADA testing is mostly accomplished with ligand-binding assays (LBA). While LBA can be robust and specific, they are susceptible to various sources of interference (3). Of particular concern, interference from residual drug present in patient samples may lead to loss of ADA detection, producing false negative results. To mitigate drug interference, sample pretreatment procedures have been developed to enrich ADA from samples with high drug concentrations (4, 5). The pretreatment procedures can vary considerably but typically involve an initial step to liberate ADA from ADA-drug complexes and a subsequent step to affinity capture ADA and acid elute for detection. While these procedures can be highly effective, they have certain drawbacks when performed manually. First, the procedures are time-consuming and require near constant attention. Second, because of the manual workflow, the procedures can produce variable results between experiments and between different analysts with negative consequences for assay robustness. To address these drawbacks, we developed an automated procedure to enrich ADA by leveraging dual flow chromatography (DFC) and Streptavidin PhyTip® columns on a liquid-handling system (6). The enriched ADA were then tested in an LBA to evaluate the effectiveness of the automated enrichment procedure.

利用链亲和素PhyTip®色谱柱在免疫原性试验中进行样品预处理的抗药物抗体富集自动化。
生物治疗药物具有诱导强效免疫反应的潜力,包括诱导抗药物抗体(ADA)(1)。在临床试验中检测和鉴定ADA是综合免疫原性计划的重要组成部分(2)。ADA检测主要通过配体结合试验(LBA)完成。虽然LBA具有鲁棒性和特异性,但它们容易受到各种干扰源的影响(3)。特别值得关注的是,患者样本中残留药物的干扰可能导致ADA检测丢失,产生假阴性结果。为了减轻药物干扰,人们开发了样品预处理程序,从高药物浓度的样品中富集ADA(4,5)。预处理程序可以有很大的不同,但通常包括从ADA-药物复合物中释放ADA的初始步骤和随后的亲和力捕获ADA和酸洗脱液以供检测的步骤。虽然这些过程可能非常有效,但在手动执行时存在某些缺点。首先,这些程序非常耗时,而且几乎需要持续的关注。其次,由于手工工作流程,这些程序可能在实验之间和不同分析人员之间产生可变结果,对分析稳健性产生负面影响。为了解决这些缺点,我们开发了一种自动化程序,利用双流色谱(DFC)和Streptavidin PhyTip®柱在液体处理系统上富集ADA(6)。然后在LBA中测试富集的ADA,以评估自动富集程序的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
AAPS Journal
AAPS Journal 医学-药学
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
4.40%
发文量
109
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The AAPS Journal, an official journal of the American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists (AAPS), publishes novel and significant findings in the various areas of pharmaceutical sciences impacting human and veterinary therapeutics, including: · Drug Design and Discovery · Pharmaceutical Biotechnology · Biopharmaceutics, Formulation, and Drug Delivery · Metabolism and Transport · Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Pharmacometrics · Translational Research · Clinical Evaluations and Therapeutic Outcomes · Regulatory Science We invite submissions under the following article types: · Original Research Articles · Reviews and Mini-reviews · White Papers, Commentaries, and Editorials · Meeting Reports · Brief/Technical Reports and Rapid Communications · Regulatory Notes · Tutorials · Protocols in the Pharmaceutical Sciences In addition, The AAPS Journal publishes themes, organized by guest editors, which are focused on particular areas of current interest to our field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信