A Comparative Study of Medium-Coverage Genome Sequencing and SNP Array Technology in Identifying Chromosomal Abnormalities to Advance Prenatal and Postnatal Diagnosis.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 PATHOLOGY
Jialun Pang, Lin Zhou, Jiancheng Hu, Hanzhe Kuang, Hui Xi, Na Ma, Shuting Yang, Wenxian Yu, Yanan Zhang, Qian Zhang, Victor Wei Zhang, Jing Chen, Ying Peng
{"title":"A Comparative Study of Medium-Coverage Genome Sequencing and SNP Array Technology in Identifying Chromosomal Abnormalities to Advance Prenatal and Postnatal Diagnosis.","authors":"Jialun Pang, Lin Zhou, Jiancheng Hu, Hanzhe Kuang, Hui Xi, Na Ma, Shuting Yang, Wenxian Yu, Yanan Zhang, Qian Zhang, Victor Wei Zhang, Jing Chen, Ying Peng","doi":"10.1016/j.jmoldx.2025.04.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to compare the performance of 5-fold genome sequencing (GS) with single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array technology in detecting chromosomal abnormalities, particularly in the context of prenatal and postnatal diagnostics. A total of 42 samples, previously analyzed by SNP array, were re-examined using 5-fold GS to evaluate the detection of clinically significant copy number variations (CNVs), mosaicism, and absence of heterozygosity (AOH). The results revealed a 100% concordance between the two methods for the identification of clinically relevant CNVs, with both technologies detecting similar CNV size ranges. However, 5-fold GS demonstrated better precision in defining CNV breakpoints and exhibited a lower false-positive rate, as confirmed by quantitative PCR validation. Additionally, 5-fold GS detected mosaicism with comparable sensitivity to SNP array, capturing mosaic levels as low as 17%, whereas SNP array identified levels between 15% and 84%. For AOH detection, 5-fold GS identified all candidate AOH regions with a slightly better sensitivity, achieving a detection size limit of 4.8 Mb compared with SNP array's 5.08 Mb. Overall, 5-fold GS shows potential as a reliable method for chromosomal abnormality detection, offering high accuracy and clinical utility in both prenatal and postnatal genetic testing.</p>","PeriodicalId":50128,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Molecular Diagnostics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Molecular Diagnostics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoldx.2025.04.009","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to compare the performance of 5-fold genome sequencing (GS) with single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array technology in detecting chromosomal abnormalities, particularly in the context of prenatal and postnatal diagnostics. A total of 42 samples, previously analyzed by SNP array, were re-examined using 5-fold GS to evaluate the detection of clinically significant copy number variations (CNVs), mosaicism, and absence of heterozygosity (AOH). The results revealed a 100% concordance between the two methods for the identification of clinically relevant CNVs, with both technologies detecting similar CNV size ranges. However, 5-fold GS demonstrated better precision in defining CNV breakpoints and exhibited a lower false-positive rate, as confirmed by quantitative PCR validation. Additionally, 5-fold GS detected mosaicism with comparable sensitivity to SNP array, capturing mosaic levels as low as 17%, whereas SNP array identified levels between 15% and 84%. For AOH detection, 5-fold GS identified all candidate AOH regions with a slightly better sensitivity, achieving a detection size limit of 4.8 Mb compared with SNP array's 5.08 Mb. Overall, 5-fold GS shows potential as a reliable method for chromosomal abnormality detection, offering high accuracy and clinical utility in both prenatal and postnatal genetic testing.

中覆盖基因组测序和SNP阵列技术在染色体异常识别中的比较研究,以促进产前和产后诊断。
本研究旨在比较5倍基因组测序(GS)和单核苷酸多态性(SNP)阵列技术在检测染色体异常方面的性能,特别是在产前和产后诊断方面。先前通过SNP阵列分析的总共42个样本,使用5倍GS重新检查,以评估临床显著拷贝数变异(CNVs),镶嵌性和缺乏杂合性(AOH)的检测。结果显示,两种方法鉴定临床相关CNV的一致性为100%,两种技术检测的CNV大小范围相似。然而,qPCR验证证实,5倍GS在确定CNV断点方面表现出更好的精度,并表现出更低的假阳性率。此外,5倍GS检测马赛克的灵敏度与SNP阵列相当,捕获的马赛克水平低至17%,而SNP阵列识别的马赛克水平在15%至84%之间。对于AOH检测,5倍GS识别出所有候选AOH区域的灵敏度略高,与SNP阵列的5.08 Mb相比,检测大小限制为4.8 Mb。总体而言,5倍GS显示出作为染色体异常检测的可靠方法的潜力,在产前和产后基因检测中都具有较高的准确性和临床实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
2.40%
发文量
143
审稿时长
43 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics, the official publication of the Association for Molecular Pathology (AMP), co-owned by the American Society for Investigative Pathology (ASIP), seeks to publish high quality original papers on scientific advances in the translation and validation of molecular discoveries in medicine into the clinical diagnostic setting, and the description and application of technological advances in the field of molecular diagnostic medicine. The editors welcome for review articles that contain: novel discoveries or clinicopathologic correlations including studies in oncology, infectious diseases, inherited diseases, predisposition to disease, clinical informatics, or the description of polymorphisms linked to disease states or normal variations; the application of diagnostic methodologies in clinical trials; or the development of new or improved molecular methods which may be applied to diagnosis or monitoring of disease or disease predisposition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信