A Comparative Study of Medium-Coverage Genome Sequencing and SNP Array Technology in Identifying Chromosomal Abnormalities to Advance Prenatal and Postnatal Diagnosis.
Jialun Pang, Lin Zhou, Jiancheng Hu, Hanzhe Kuang, Hui Xi, Na Ma, Shuting Yang, Wenxian Yu, Yanan Zhang, Qian Zhang, Victor Wei Zhang, Jing Chen, Ying Peng
{"title":"A Comparative Study of Medium-Coverage Genome Sequencing and SNP Array Technology in Identifying Chromosomal Abnormalities to Advance Prenatal and Postnatal Diagnosis.","authors":"Jialun Pang, Lin Zhou, Jiancheng Hu, Hanzhe Kuang, Hui Xi, Na Ma, Shuting Yang, Wenxian Yu, Yanan Zhang, Qian Zhang, Victor Wei Zhang, Jing Chen, Ying Peng","doi":"10.1016/j.jmoldx.2025.04.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to compare the performance of 5-fold genome sequencing (GS) with single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array technology in detecting chromosomal abnormalities, particularly in the context of prenatal and postnatal diagnostics. A total of 42 samples, previously analyzed by SNP array, were re-examined using 5-fold GS to evaluate the detection of clinically significant copy number variations (CNVs), mosaicism, and absence of heterozygosity (AOH). The results revealed a 100% concordance between the two methods for the identification of clinically relevant CNVs, with both technologies detecting similar CNV size ranges. However, 5-fold GS demonstrated better precision in defining CNV breakpoints and exhibited a lower false-positive rate, as confirmed by quantitative PCR validation. Additionally, 5-fold GS detected mosaicism with comparable sensitivity to SNP array, capturing mosaic levels as low as 17%, whereas SNP array identified levels between 15% and 84%. For AOH detection, 5-fold GS identified all candidate AOH regions with a slightly better sensitivity, achieving a detection size limit of 4.8 Mb compared with SNP array's 5.08 Mb. Overall, 5-fold GS shows potential as a reliable method for chromosomal abnormality detection, offering high accuracy and clinical utility in both prenatal and postnatal genetic testing.</p>","PeriodicalId":50128,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Molecular Diagnostics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Molecular Diagnostics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoldx.2025.04.009","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study aimed to compare the performance of 5-fold genome sequencing (GS) with single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array technology in detecting chromosomal abnormalities, particularly in the context of prenatal and postnatal diagnostics. A total of 42 samples, previously analyzed by SNP array, were re-examined using 5-fold GS to evaluate the detection of clinically significant copy number variations (CNVs), mosaicism, and absence of heterozygosity (AOH). The results revealed a 100% concordance between the two methods for the identification of clinically relevant CNVs, with both technologies detecting similar CNV size ranges. However, 5-fold GS demonstrated better precision in defining CNV breakpoints and exhibited a lower false-positive rate, as confirmed by quantitative PCR validation. Additionally, 5-fold GS detected mosaicism with comparable sensitivity to SNP array, capturing mosaic levels as low as 17%, whereas SNP array identified levels between 15% and 84%. For AOH detection, 5-fold GS identified all candidate AOH regions with a slightly better sensitivity, achieving a detection size limit of 4.8 Mb compared with SNP array's 5.08 Mb. Overall, 5-fold GS shows potential as a reliable method for chromosomal abnormality detection, offering high accuracy and clinical utility in both prenatal and postnatal genetic testing.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics, the official publication of the Association for Molecular Pathology (AMP), co-owned by the American Society for Investigative Pathology (ASIP), seeks to publish high quality original papers on scientific advances in the translation and validation of molecular discoveries in medicine into the clinical diagnostic setting, and the description and application of technological advances in the field of molecular diagnostic medicine. The editors welcome for review articles that contain: novel discoveries or clinicopathologic correlations including studies in oncology, infectious diseases, inherited diseases, predisposition to disease, clinical informatics, or the description of polymorphisms linked to disease states or normal variations; the application of diagnostic methodologies in clinical trials; or the development of new or improved molecular methods which may be applied to diagnosis or monitoring of disease or disease predisposition.