The effect of training data size on real-time respiration prediction using long short-term memory model.

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Wenzheng Sun, Jun Dang, Lei Zhang, Qichun Wei, Chao Li, Ye Liu, Huang Jing, Kanghua Huang, Yuanpeng Zhang, Bing Li
{"title":"The effect of training data size on real-time respiration prediction using long short-term memory model.","authors":"Wenzheng Sun, Jun Dang, Lei Zhang, Qichun Wei, Chao Li, Ye Liu, Huang Jing, Kanghua Huang, Yuanpeng Zhang, Bing Li","doi":"10.1186/s13014-025-02676-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate the optimal training dataset size (TDS) for respiration prediction accuracy using a long short-term memory (LSTM) model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The respiratory signals of 151 patients acquired with the real-time position management system were retrospectively included in this study. Among the dataset, 101 respiratory signals were utilized to evaluate the impact of the TDS on prediction accuracy, while the remaining 50 signals were employed for setting the default hyperparameters. The prediction accuracy of the LSTM model using eight different TDSs (10 s, 20 s, 30 s, 60 s, 90 s, 110 s, 130 s, and 150 s) was examined and evaluated by the root mean square error (RMSE) between the real and predicted respiratory signals. The interplay effects of the main hyperparameters, the ahead time and the different testing data lengths using different TDSs were also measured.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For the 520 ms ahead time, the root mean square error values of the LSTM model using the eight different training data sizes listed above were 0.146 cm, 0.137 cm, 0.134 cm, 0.125 cm, 0.120 cm, 0.121 cm, 0.121 cm, and 0.119 cm, respectively. The LSTM model achieved the highest prediction accuracy when the TDS was 150 s. The prediction accuracy was stable when the TDS exceeded 90 s.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TDS selection could influence the respiration signal prediction accuracy of the LSTM model. The relationship between TDS and the prediction accuracy of the LSTM model was not linear. The 90 s seemed to be an optimal TDS for the respiration signal prediction tasks using the LSTM model, as it was the shortest time at which a favorable prediction accuracy was maintained in this study.</p>","PeriodicalId":49639,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Oncology","volume":"20 1","pages":"97"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12144701/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-025-02676-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To investigate the optimal training dataset size (TDS) for respiration prediction accuracy using a long short-term memory (LSTM) model.

Methods: The respiratory signals of 151 patients acquired with the real-time position management system were retrospectively included in this study. Among the dataset, 101 respiratory signals were utilized to evaluate the impact of the TDS on prediction accuracy, while the remaining 50 signals were employed for setting the default hyperparameters. The prediction accuracy of the LSTM model using eight different TDSs (10 s, 20 s, 30 s, 60 s, 90 s, 110 s, 130 s, and 150 s) was examined and evaluated by the root mean square error (RMSE) between the real and predicted respiratory signals. The interplay effects of the main hyperparameters, the ahead time and the different testing data lengths using different TDSs were also measured.

Results: For the 520 ms ahead time, the root mean square error values of the LSTM model using the eight different training data sizes listed above were 0.146 cm, 0.137 cm, 0.134 cm, 0.125 cm, 0.120 cm, 0.121 cm, 0.121 cm, and 0.119 cm, respectively. The LSTM model achieved the highest prediction accuracy when the TDS was 150 s. The prediction accuracy was stable when the TDS exceeded 90 s.

Conclusions: TDS selection could influence the respiration signal prediction accuracy of the LSTM model. The relationship between TDS and the prediction accuracy of the LSTM model was not linear. The 90 s seemed to be an optimal TDS for the respiration signal prediction tasks using the LSTM model, as it was the shortest time at which a favorable prediction accuracy was maintained in this study.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

训练数据大小对长短期记忆模型实时呼吸预测的影响。
目的:研究使用长短期记忆(LSTM)模型预测呼吸准确度的最佳训练数据集大小(TDS)。方法:回顾性分析使用实时体位管理系统采集的151例患者的呼吸信号。在数据集中,101个呼吸信号用于评估TDS对预测精度的影响,其余50个信号用于设置默认超参数。采用8种不同的tds (10 s、20 s、30 s、60 s、90 s、110 s、130 s和150 s)对LSTM模型的预测精度进行检验,并用实际呼吸信号与预测呼吸信号的均方根误差(RMSE)对模型的预测精度进行评价。并对主要超参数、预测时间和不同tds下不同测试数据长度的相互作用进行了研究。结果:在520 ms前,使用上述8种不同训练数据大小的LSTM模型的均方根误差值分别为0.146 cm、0.137 cm、0.134 cm、0.125 cm、0.120 cm、0.121 cm、0.121 cm和0.119 cm。LSTM模型在TDS为150 s时预测精度最高。当TDS大于90 s时,预测精度稳定。结论:TDS的选择会影响LSTM模型的呼吸信号预测精度。TDS与LSTM模型的预测精度呈非线性关系。90 s似乎是使用LSTM模型进行呼吸信号预测任务的最佳TDS,因为它是本研究中保持良好预测精度的最短时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Radiation Oncology
Radiation Oncology ONCOLOGY-RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.80%
发文量
181
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Radiation Oncology encompasses all aspects of research that impacts on the treatment of cancer using radiation. It publishes findings in molecular and cellular radiation biology, radiation physics, radiation technology, and clinical oncology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信