Do the "big four" orders of insects comprise evolutionarily significant higher taxa with coherent patterns of selection on protein-coding genes?

IF 3.4 1区 生物学 Q2 EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY
Evolution Letters Pub Date : 2025-03-06 eCollection Date: 2025-06-01 DOI:10.1093/evlett/qraf005
Pierre J Février, Timothy G Barraclough
{"title":"Do the \"big four\" orders of insects comprise evolutionarily significant higher taxa with coherent patterns of selection on protein-coding genes?","authors":"Pierre J Février, Timothy G Barraclough","doi":"10.1093/evlett/qraf005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Species are often treated as evolutionarily significant units of diversity that reflect patterns of gene flow and selection. In contrast, higher taxa are mostly regarded as convenient labels for levels in the tree of life, which reflect evolutionary history if defined cladistically but are assumed to have no real significance for ongoing evolution. We test the alternative hypothesis that some higher taxa are evolutionarily significant units with coherent patterns of selection on their constituent species. Specifically, we ask whether the big 4 orders of holometabolous insects, namely Coleoptera, Diptera, Hymenoptera, and Lepidoptera, display divergent, but internally conserved patterns of selection acting on protein-coding genes. Analyzing orthologous genes from whole genome sequence data for multiple species per order, we find that, in most genes, selection on roughly one fifth of codons is conserved within each order but differs significantly among orders. The shift is associated with variation in GC content among orders, but primarily at codon 2nd positions hence due to selection rather than mutational or repair bias. Comparison of alternative models assigning different taxonomic levels (either more lumped or divided than orders) shows that best models always specify Hymenoptera and Lepidoptera as coherent units, whereas patterns of selection on protein-coding genes within Coleoptera and especially Diptera are better explained by subdividing them further. We hypothesise that some aspect of the general lifestyle, body plan or genetic makeup of orders (or of nested clades within Coleoptera and Diptera) leads to conserved patterns of selection across protein-coding genes within them, whereas constraints differ among them. The emergence of whole-genome data for broad and deep phylogenetic samples will allow this hypothesis of evolutionarily significant higher taxa versus more evenly dispersed shifts in selection across genes to be tested further.</p>","PeriodicalId":48629,"journal":{"name":"Evolution Letters","volume":"9 3","pages":"355-366"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12137047/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evolution Letters","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/evlett/qraf005","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Species are often treated as evolutionarily significant units of diversity that reflect patterns of gene flow and selection. In contrast, higher taxa are mostly regarded as convenient labels for levels in the tree of life, which reflect evolutionary history if defined cladistically but are assumed to have no real significance for ongoing evolution. We test the alternative hypothesis that some higher taxa are evolutionarily significant units with coherent patterns of selection on their constituent species. Specifically, we ask whether the big 4 orders of holometabolous insects, namely Coleoptera, Diptera, Hymenoptera, and Lepidoptera, display divergent, but internally conserved patterns of selection acting on protein-coding genes. Analyzing orthologous genes from whole genome sequence data for multiple species per order, we find that, in most genes, selection on roughly one fifth of codons is conserved within each order but differs significantly among orders. The shift is associated with variation in GC content among orders, but primarily at codon 2nd positions hence due to selection rather than mutational or repair bias. Comparison of alternative models assigning different taxonomic levels (either more lumped or divided than orders) shows that best models always specify Hymenoptera and Lepidoptera as coherent units, whereas patterns of selection on protein-coding genes within Coleoptera and especially Diptera are better explained by subdividing them further. We hypothesise that some aspect of the general lifestyle, body plan or genetic makeup of orders (or of nested clades within Coleoptera and Diptera) leads to conserved patterns of selection across protein-coding genes within them, whereas constraints differ among them. The emergence of whole-genome data for broad and deep phylogenetic samples will allow this hypothesis of evolutionarily significant higher taxa versus more evenly dispersed shifts in selection across genes to be tested further.

昆虫的“四大”目是否包括进化上具有重要意义的高级分类群,它们对蛋白质编码基因的选择模式是一致的?
物种通常被视为反映基因流动和选择模式的进化上重要的多样性单位。相比之下,高等分类群大多被认为是生命之树中等级的方便标签,如果按分类定义,它们反映了进化史,但被认为对正在进行的进化没有真正的意义。我们测试了另一种假设,即一些高等分类群是进化上重要的单位,在其组成物种上具有一致的选择模式。具体来说,我们想知道全异翅昆虫的4大目,即鞘翅目、双翅目、膜翅目和鳞翅目,是否表现出不同的、但内部保守的选择模式,这些模式作用于蛋白质编码基因。通过对每目多个物种的全基因组序列数据进行分析,我们发现,在大多数基因中,大约五分之一的密码子选择在每个目中都是保守的,但在不同目之间存在显著差异。这种移位与序列间GC含量的变化有关,但主要是在密码子2位置,因此是由于选择而不是突变或修复偏差。通过对不同分类水平(集中或划分多于目)的模型进行比较,发现最好的模型总是将膜翅目和鳞翅目作为一致的单位,而对鞘翅目特别是双翅目的蛋白质编码基因的选择模式则通过进一步细分来更好地解释。我们假设一般的生活方式、身体计划或目(或鞘翅目和双翅目的嵌套进化支)的基因组成的某些方面导致了它们内部蛋白质编码基因之间的保守选择模式,而它们之间的限制是不同的。广泛和深层系统发育样本的全基因组数据的出现,将使进化上显著的高等分类群与更均匀分散的基因选择转移的假设得到进一步的验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Evolution Letters
Evolution Letters EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY-
CiteScore
13.00
自引率
2.00%
发文量
35
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Evolution Letters publishes cutting-edge new research in all areas of Evolutionary Biology. Available exclusively online, and entirely open access, Evolution Letters consists of Letters - original pieces of research which form the bulk of papers - and Comments and Opinion - a forum for highlighting timely new research ideas for the evolutionary community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信