Section 113 of the Constitution and Its Impact on the Regulation of Cannabis Oil for Recreational Purposes.

IF 0.6 Q2 LAW
Journal of Law and Medicine Pub Date : 2025-06-01
Patrick Keyzer, Christopher Goff
{"title":"Section 113 of the Constitution and Its Impact on the Regulation of Cannabis Oil for Recreational Purposes.","authors":"Patrick Keyzer, Christopher Goff","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The legalisation of cannabis in Australia is attracting significant political support at the moment. Medicinal cannabis has already been legalised, and is regulated, at the national level in Australia. Given the strength of support for political parties that are focused on this issue, it is not fanciful to suggest that political pressure to allow non-medical use of cannabis oil in Australia, or States of Australia, will rise in the near future to the point where legislative action will take place. The purpose of this article is instead to explore how a very rarely considered provision, s 113 of the Australian Constitution, might operate to guide or restrict the choices that can be made by Australian parliaments if they decide to legalise and regulate non-medical use of cannabis oil. We also discuss s 113 of the Constitution in the context provided by other constitutional provisions. This inquiry is important, because (of course) any attempt to legalise adult use of cannabis oil must be supported on constitutional grounds.</p>","PeriodicalId":45522,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Law and Medicine","volume":"32 1","pages":"161-178"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Law and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The legalisation of cannabis in Australia is attracting significant political support at the moment. Medicinal cannabis has already been legalised, and is regulated, at the national level in Australia. Given the strength of support for political parties that are focused on this issue, it is not fanciful to suggest that political pressure to allow non-medical use of cannabis oil in Australia, or States of Australia, will rise in the near future to the point where legislative action will take place. The purpose of this article is instead to explore how a very rarely considered provision, s 113 of the Australian Constitution, might operate to guide or restrict the choices that can be made by Australian parliaments if they decide to legalise and regulate non-medical use of cannabis oil. We also discuss s 113 of the Constitution in the context provided by other constitutional provisions. This inquiry is important, because (of course) any attempt to legalise adult use of cannabis oil must be supported on constitutional grounds.

《宪法》第113条及其对娱乐用大麻油管制的影响。
目前,澳大利亚的大麻合法化正在吸引重要的政治支持。在澳大利亚,药用大麻已经合法化,并受到国家层面的监管。鉴于对关注这一问题的政党的大力支持,建议在澳大利亚或澳大利亚各州允许非医疗使用大麻油的政治压力将在不久的将来上升到采取立法行动的程度,这并不是异想。相反,本文的目的是探讨如果澳大利亚议会决定将大麻油的非医疗使用合法化并加以管制,那么《澳大利亚宪法》第113条这一很少被考虑的条款如何指导或限制其可作出的选择。我们还在其他宪法条款提供的背景下讨论宪法第113条。这项调查很重要,因为(当然)任何将成人使用大麻油合法化的尝试都必须得到宪法的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信