Sex-based differences in genetic alterations and immune checkpoint inhibitor response in urothelial bladder cancer.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Jean-Pierre Trey Kanumuambidi, Reynier Rodriguez Rosales, Arjun Venkatesh, Thomas Metzner, Nicole Murray, Mohammed Al-Toubat, Yudai Ishiyama, Hunter Sceats, Mark Bandyk, K C Balaji
{"title":"Sex-based differences in genetic alterations and immune checkpoint inhibitor response in urothelial bladder cancer.","authors":"Jean-Pierre Trey Kanumuambidi, Reynier Rodriguez Rosales, Arjun Venkatesh, Thomas Metzner, Nicole Murray, Mohammed Al-Toubat, Yudai Ishiyama, Hunter Sceats, Mark Bandyk, K C Balaji","doi":"10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.05.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Bladder cancer exhibits significant sex-based disparities, with men showing higher incidence rates and women experiencing more aggressive disease and poorer survival outcomes. This study investigates sex-specific somatic genetic alterations (GAs) in urothelial bladder cancer and their effects on survival, immune cell infiltration, and immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) responses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed 3,157 patients with urothelial bladder cancer using next-generation sequencing data from the American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) Project GENIE. Kaplan-Meier analysis assessed overall survival, while TIMER2.0 and ROC Plotter evaluated immune cell infiltration and ICI responses. Synthetic lethal interactions were identified through the SLOAD database, and co-occurrence patterns were examined (significance at P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 3,157 patients (median age: 70), 76% were male. Somatic gene alterations were identified in 35% of cases, more frequently in men (38% vs. 29%, P < 0.001). Men had more alterations in RB1, CDKN1A, and ERCC2 (all P < 0.001), while AR gene alterations were more common in women. Patients with CDKN1A, RB1, or ERCC2 alterations had significantly worse 5-year survival (18-27 vs. 35.4 months; P = 0.0219), with RB1 alterations linked to the lowest 10-year survival rates (21.3% vs. 28.3%, P = 0.0219). Immune profiling revealed increased CD8⁺ T cell and NK cell infiltration in RB1-altered tumors, while AR alterations correlated with decreased monocyte infiltration.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Somatic GAs contribute to sex-based survival disparities in bladder cancer. RB1 and AR alterations emerge as critical drivers of poor outcomes and potential therapeutic targets, underscoring the need for sex-tailored treatment strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":23408,"journal":{"name":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.05.013","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Bladder cancer exhibits significant sex-based disparities, with men showing higher incidence rates and women experiencing more aggressive disease and poorer survival outcomes. This study investigates sex-specific somatic genetic alterations (GAs) in urothelial bladder cancer and their effects on survival, immune cell infiltration, and immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) responses.

Methods: We analyzed 3,157 patients with urothelial bladder cancer using next-generation sequencing data from the American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) Project GENIE. Kaplan-Meier analysis assessed overall survival, while TIMER2.0 and ROC Plotter evaluated immune cell infiltration and ICI responses. Synthetic lethal interactions were identified through the SLOAD database, and co-occurrence patterns were examined (significance at P < 0.05).

Results: Among the 3,157 patients (median age: 70), 76% were male. Somatic gene alterations were identified in 35% of cases, more frequently in men (38% vs. 29%, P < 0.001). Men had more alterations in RB1, CDKN1A, and ERCC2 (all P < 0.001), while AR gene alterations were more common in women. Patients with CDKN1A, RB1, or ERCC2 alterations had significantly worse 5-year survival (18-27 vs. 35.4 months; P = 0.0219), with RB1 alterations linked to the lowest 10-year survival rates (21.3% vs. 28.3%, P = 0.0219). Immune profiling revealed increased CD8⁺ T cell and NK cell infiltration in RB1-altered tumors, while AR alterations correlated with decreased monocyte infiltration.

Conclusion: Somatic GAs contribute to sex-based survival disparities in bladder cancer. RB1 and AR alterations emerge as critical drivers of poor outcomes and potential therapeutic targets, underscoring the need for sex-tailored treatment strategies.

尿路上皮性膀胱癌中基因改变和免疫检查点抑制剂反应的性别差异
导言:膀胱癌表现出明显的性别差异,男性发病率更高,女性发病率更高,生存期更差。本研究探讨尿路上皮性膀胱癌性别特异性体细胞遗传改变(GAs)及其对生存、免疫细胞浸润和免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)反应的影响。方法:我们使用来自美国癌症研究协会(AACR) GENIE项目的下一代测序数据分析了3157例尿路上皮性膀胱癌患者。Kaplan-Meier分析评估总生存期,TIMER2.0和ROC绘画仪评估免疫细胞浸润和ICI反应。通过SLOAD数据库鉴定合成致死相互作用,并检查共发生模式(P < 0.05)。结果:在3157例患者(中位年龄:70岁)中,76%为男性。35%的病例发现了体细胞基因改变,男性更常见(38%对29%,P < 0.001)。男性在RB1、CDKN1A和ERCC2中有更多的改变(均P < 0.001),而AR基因的改变在女性中更常见。CDKN1A、RB1或ERCC2改变的患者5年生存率明显较差(18-27 vs. 35.4个月;P = 0.0219), RB1改变与最低的10年生存率相关(21.3%对28.3%,P = 0.0219)。免疫分析显示,在rb1改变的肿瘤中,CD8 + T细胞和NK细胞浸润增加,而AR改变与单核细胞浸润减少相关。结论:躯体气体与膀胱癌患者的性别生存差异有关。RB1和AR改变是不良结果和潜在治疗靶点的关键驱动因素,强调了针对性别的治疗策略的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.70%
发文量
297
审稿时长
7.6 weeks
期刊介绍: Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations is the official journal of the Society of Urologic Oncology. The journal publishes practical, timely, and relevant clinical and basic science research articles which address any aspect of urologic oncology. Each issue comprises original research, news and topics, survey articles providing short commentaries on other important articles in the urologic oncology literature, and reviews including an in-depth Seminar examining a specific clinical dilemma. The journal periodically publishes supplement issues devoted to areas of current interest to the urologic oncology community. Articles published are of interest to researchers and the clinicians involved in the practice of urologic oncology including urologists, oncologists, and radiologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信