Cristina Andreoli , Maria Dusinska , Cecilia Bossa , Chiara Laura Battistelli , Maria João Silva , Henriqueta Louro
{"title":"Regulatory practices on the genotoxicity testing of nanomaterials and outlook for the future","authors":"Cristina Andreoli , Maria Dusinska , Cecilia Bossa , Chiara Laura Battistelli , Maria João Silva , Henriqueta Louro","doi":"10.1016/j.yrtph.2025.105881","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The toxicity of nanomaterials(NMs) is closely tied to their physicochemical properties, such as size, shape, surface chemistry, stability in biological medium, and state of agglomeration as well to their uptake by cells. Key deficiencies in standardized testing approaches have been identified and tackled in recent years. Within the landscape of new approach methods (NAMs), the aim of this work is to review existing approaches for genotoxicity testing of the NMs under different regulatory domains, with a perspective on the development of NAMs that can solve longstanding difficulties in NMs’ risk assessment. It critically examines international and European Union guidelines, highlighting the need for harmonization and the potential of NAMs to drive next-generation risk assessment. However, further collaboration, research and validation are essential to gain wider acceptance and applicability. The contribution of innovative technological approaches based on big data, artificial intelligence and machine learning, may pave powerful comparisons among different sectors and grouping strategies that will furtherance innovation in the nanotoxicology research. The future outlook for the genotoxicity testing of NMs will depend on increased cooperation between regulatory agencies, researchers, and industry stakeholders. Key steps toward overcoming current obstacles include establishing clearer pathways for data sharing, standardizing testing protocols, and fostering greater international collaboration.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20852,"journal":{"name":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","volume":"162 ","pages":"Article 105881"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0273230025001114","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The toxicity of nanomaterials(NMs) is closely tied to their physicochemical properties, such as size, shape, surface chemistry, stability in biological medium, and state of agglomeration as well to their uptake by cells. Key deficiencies in standardized testing approaches have been identified and tackled in recent years. Within the landscape of new approach methods (NAMs), the aim of this work is to review existing approaches for genotoxicity testing of the NMs under different regulatory domains, with a perspective on the development of NAMs that can solve longstanding difficulties in NMs’ risk assessment. It critically examines international and European Union guidelines, highlighting the need for harmonization and the potential of NAMs to drive next-generation risk assessment. However, further collaboration, research and validation are essential to gain wider acceptance and applicability. The contribution of innovative technological approaches based on big data, artificial intelligence and machine learning, may pave powerful comparisons among different sectors and grouping strategies that will furtherance innovation in the nanotoxicology research. The future outlook for the genotoxicity testing of NMs will depend on increased cooperation between regulatory agencies, researchers, and industry stakeholders. Key steps toward overcoming current obstacles include establishing clearer pathways for data sharing, standardizing testing protocols, and fostering greater international collaboration.
期刊介绍:
Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology publishes peer reviewed articles that involve the generation, evaluation, and interpretation of experimental animal and human data that are of direct importance and relevance for regulatory authorities with respect to toxicological and pharmacological regulations in society. All peer-reviewed articles that are published should be devoted to improve the protection of human health and environment. Reviews and discussions are welcomed that address legal and/or regulatory decisions with respect to risk assessment and management of toxicological and pharmacological compounds on a scientific basis. It addresses an international readership of scientists, risk assessors and managers, and other professionals active in the field of human and environmental health.
Types of peer-reviewed articles published:
-Original research articles of relevance for regulatory aspects covering aspects including, but not limited to:
1.Factors influencing human sensitivity
2.Exposure science related to risk assessment
3.Alternative toxicological test methods
4.Frameworks for evaluation and integration of data in regulatory evaluations
5.Harmonization across regulatory agencies
6.Read-across methods and evaluations
-Contemporary Reviews on policy related Research issues
-Letters to the Editor
-Guest Editorials (by Invitation)