Characterizing Stressors and Coping Strategies Among Caregivers of Patients with Severe Acute Brain Injury by Level of Distress.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Katherine J Meurer, Alexander M Presciutti, Sarah M Bannon, Rina Kubota, Nithyashri Baskaran, Jisoo Kim, Qiang Zhang, Mira Reichman, Nathan S Fishbein, Kaitlyn Lichstein, Melissa Motta, Susanne Muehlschlegel, Michael E Reznik, Matthew N Jaffa, Claire J Creutzfeldt, Corey R Fehnel, Amanda D Tomlinson, Craig A Williamson, Ana-Maria Vranceanu, David Y Hwang
{"title":"Characterizing Stressors and Coping Strategies Among Caregivers of Patients with Severe Acute Brain Injury by Level of Distress.","authors":"Katherine J Meurer, Alexander M Presciutti, Sarah M Bannon, Rina Kubota, Nithyashri Baskaran, Jisoo Kim, Qiang Zhang, Mira Reichman, Nathan S Fishbein, Kaitlyn Lichstein, Melissa Motta, Susanne Muehlschlegel, Michael E Reznik, Matthew N Jaffa, Claire J Creutzfeldt, Corey R Fehnel, Amanda D Tomlinson, Craig A Williamson, Ana-Maria Vranceanu, David Y Hwang","doi":"10.1007/s12028-025-02294-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Family caregivers of patients with severe acute brain injury (SABI) who commit to tracheostomy and/or percutaneous endoscopic/surgical gastrostomy for the patient often develop chronic emotional distress. To inform future interventions to mitigate this distress, we characterized the stressors and coping strategies of caregivers of patients with SABI with varying levels of emotional distress during the acute and postacute stages of treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted semistructured interviews with family caregivers of patients with SABI around the time of neurological intensive care unit discharge (T1) and at 2-month follow-up (T2). All caregivers included in this current study completed the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale at T1 and/or T2. We then stratified transcripts by caregiver distress level, characterizing caregivers who scored > 11 on at least one Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale subscale as \"high distress\" and ≤ 11 as \"low distress.\" We conducted deductive, conceptual content analysis to compare perceived stressors and coping strategies employed at both time points.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Caregivers in both strata reported many similar stressors at each time point, including ongoing uncertainty. However, there were also differences in stressors by level of distress and time point of assessment. At T1, high-distress caregivers reported pronounced stress related to navigating the health care system and communicating with providers, staff, and the patient. At T2, high-distress caregivers noted heightened difficulty with transitioning to long-term caregiving, co-occurring complex emotions, and communication with family and friends. Conversely, low-distress caregivers focused on challenges with team-based medical decision making at T2. Clear differences in coping strategies also emerged, such that high-distress caregivers relied primarily on avoidance at both points, whereas low-distress caregivers incorporated more problem-solving and self-care strategies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Psychosocial interventions for caregivers of patients with SABI are needed to reduce emotional distress. Skills should be applied to relevant topics based on time since neurological intensive care unit discharge and distress level. Skills should focus on reducing avoidance, promoting active coping, and targeting the perceived stressors specific to high-distress versus low-distress caregivers revealed here.</p>","PeriodicalId":19118,"journal":{"name":"Neurocritical Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurocritical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-025-02294-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Family caregivers of patients with severe acute brain injury (SABI) who commit to tracheostomy and/or percutaneous endoscopic/surgical gastrostomy for the patient often develop chronic emotional distress. To inform future interventions to mitigate this distress, we characterized the stressors and coping strategies of caregivers of patients with SABI with varying levels of emotional distress during the acute and postacute stages of treatment.

Methods: We conducted semistructured interviews with family caregivers of patients with SABI around the time of neurological intensive care unit discharge (T1) and at 2-month follow-up (T2). All caregivers included in this current study completed the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale at T1 and/or T2. We then stratified transcripts by caregiver distress level, characterizing caregivers who scored > 11 on at least one Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale subscale as "high distress" and ≤ 11 as "low distress." We conducted deductive, conceptual content analysis to compare perceived stressors and coping strategies employed at both time points.

Results: Caregivers in both strata reported many similar stressors at each time point, including ongoing uncertainty. However, there were also differences in stressors by level of distress and time point of assessment. At T1, high-distress caregivers reported pronounced stress related to navigating the health care system and communicating with providers, staff, and the patient. At T2, high-distress caregivers noted heightened difficulty with transitioning to long-term caregiving, co-occurring complex emotions, and communication with family and friends. Conversely, low-distress caregivers focused on challenges with team-based medical decision making at T2. Clear differences in coping strategies also emerged, such that high-distress caregivers relied primarily on avoidance at both points, whereas low-distress caregivers incorporated more problem-solving and self-care strategies.

Conclusions: Psychosocial interventions for caregivers of patients with SABI are needed to reduce emotional distress. Skills should be applied to relevant topics based on time since neurological intensive care unit discharge and distress level. Skills should focus on reducing avoidance, promoting active coping, and targeting the perceived stressors specific to high-distress versus low-distress caregivers revealed here.

严重急性脑损伤患者护理人员的应激源特征及应对策略
背景:严重急性脑损伤(SABI)患者的家庭照顾者承诺气管造口术和/或经皮内窥镜/手术胃造口术的患者经常出现慢性情绪困扰。为了为未来的干预措施提供信息以减轻这种痛苦,我们对急性期和急性期后不同程度情绪痛苦的SABI患者的护理人员的压力源和应对策略进行了表征。方法:我们对SABI患者在神经重症监护病房出院前后(T1)和随访2个月时(T2)的家庭照顾者进行了半结构化访谈。本研究中所有护理人员均在T1和/或T2完成医院焦虑和抑郁量表。然后,我们根据护理人员的痛苦程度对转录本进行分层,将至少在医院焦虑和抑郁量表的一个子量表上得分为> 11分的护理人员定性为“高痛苦”,≤11分的护理人员为“低痛苦”。我们进行了演绎、概念内容分析来比较两个时间点的感知压力源和应对策略。结果:两个阶层的护理人员在每个时间点都报告了许多相似的压力源,包括持续的不确定性。然而,压力源在压力水平和评估时间点上也存在差异。在T1,高痛苦护理人员报告了与医疗保健系统导航以及与提供者,工作人员和患者沟通相关的明显压力。在T2阶段,高痛苦照护者注意到在过渡到长期照护、同时出现复杂情绪以及与家人和朋友沟通方面的高度困难。相反,低痛苦护理者在T2阶段关注团队医疗决策的挑战。在应对策略上也出现了明显的差异,比如高痛苦的照顾者在这两点上主要依赖于回避,而低痛苦的照顾者则更多地采用解决问题和自我照顾的策略。结论:需要对SABI患者的照顾者进行心理社会干预以减少情绪困扰。技能应应用于相关主题的时间,因为神经重症监护病房出院和痛苦水平。技能应该集中于减少回避,促进积极应对,并针对高痛苦和低痛苦护理者的特定感知压力源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurocritical Care
Neurocritical Care 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
8.60%
发文量
221
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurocritical Care is a peer reviewed scientific publication whose major goal is to disseminate new knowledge on all aspects of acute neurological care. It is directed towards neurosurgeons, neuro-intensivists, neurologists, anesthesiologists, emergency physicians, and critical care nurses treating patients with urgent neurologic disorders. These are conditions that may potentially evolve rapidly and could need immediate medical or surgical intervention. Neurocritical Care provides a comprehensive overview of current developments in intensive care neurology, neurosurgery and neuroanesthesia and includes information about new therapeutic avenues and technological innovations. Neurocritical Care is the official journal of the Neurocritical Care Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信