Intracorporeal stapled versus extracorporeal hand-sewn anastomosis in minimal-invasive right hemicolectomy with complete mesocolic excision - a retrospective single center analysis.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Maximilian Brunner, Katja Bondartschuk, Axel Denz, Georg F Weber, Robert Grützmann, Christian Krautz
{"title":"Intracorporeal stapled versus extracorporeal hand-sewn anastomosis in minimal-invasive right hemicolectomy with complete mesocolic excision - a retrospective single center analysis.","authors":"Maximilian Brunner, Katja Bondartschuk, Axel Denz, Georg F Weber, Robert Grützmann, Christian Krautz","doi":"10.1007/s00423-025-03749-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Minimally invasive right hemicolectomy can be performed with either an extracorporeal or intracorporeal anastomosis, with the latter gaining increasing popularity. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of the anastomotic technique on postoperative outcomes and recovery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed 177 patients who underwent minimally invasive right hemicolectomy with complete mesocolic excision (CME) at our institution from 2016 to May 2024. Of these, 96 patients received an extracorporeal hand-sewn end-to-end anastomosis, while 81 patients underwent an intracorporeal stapled side-to-side isoperistaltic anastomosis. The impact of the anastomotic technique on postoperative outcomes and recovery was assessed using uni- and multivariate analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients with intracorporeal anastomoses experienced significantly fewer surgical site infections (0% vs. 3%, p = 0.032), less postoperative pain at rest and under stress on postoperative day (POD) 4 (p = 0.028 and p = 0.007, respectively), earlier first bowel movement (POD 2 vs. POD 3, p = 0.014) and shorter postoperative hospital stays (5 vs. 6 days, p = 0.049). There were no significant differences between the groups in overall morbidity, reoperations or anastomotic leakage rates. Multivariate analysis indicated that the intracorporeal anastomosis technique was significantly associated with enhanced postoperative recovery (defined as first stool by POD 2, full meal tolerance by POD 4 and discharge by POD 6; OR 0.5 [0.2-0.9], p = 0.036).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Intracorporeal stapled side-to-side anastomosis may enhance postoperative recovery after minimal-invasive right hemicolectomy with CME.</p>","PeriodicalId":17983,"journal":{"name":"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery","volume":"410 1","pages":"180"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12148967/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-025-03749-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Minimally invasive right hemicolectomy can be performed with either an extracorporeal or intracorporeal anastomosis, with the latter gaining increasing popularity. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of the anastomotic technique on postoperative outcomes and recovery.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 177 patients who underwent minimally invasive right hemicolectomy with complete mesocolic excision (CME) at our institution from 2016 to May 2024. Of these, 96 patients received an extracorporeal hand-sewn end-to-end anastomosis, while 81 patients underwent an intracorporeal stapled side-to-side isoperistaltic anastomosis. The impact of the anastomotic technique on postoperative outcomes and recovery was assessed using uni- and multivariate analyses.

Results: Patients with intracorporeal anastomoses experienced significantly fewer surgical site infections (0% vs. 3%, p = 0.032), less postoperative pain at rest and under stress on postoperative day (POD) 4 (p = 0.028 and p = 0.007, respectively), earlier first bowel movement (POD 2 vs. POD 3, p = 0.014) and shorter postoperative hospital stays (5 vs. 6 days, p = 0.049). There were no significant differences between the groups in overall morbidity, reoperations or anastomotic leakage rates. Multivariate analysis indicated that the intracorporeal anastomosis technique was significantly associated with enhanced postoperative recovery (defined as first stool by POD 2, full meal tolerance by POD 4 and discharge by POD 6; OR 0.5 [0.2-0.9], p = 0.036).

Conclusion: Intracorporeal stapled side-to-side anastomosis may enhance postoperative recovery after minimal-invasive right hemicolectomy with CME.

微创右半结肠全肠系膜切除术中体外缝合吻合术与体外手工缝合吻合术的对比——回顾性单中心分析。
背景:微创右半结肠切除术既可采用体外吻合也可采用体内吻合,后者越来越受欢迎。本研究旨在评估吻合技术对术后预后和恢复的影响。方法:回顾性分析2016年至2024年5月我院行微创右半结肠全肠系膜切除术(CME)的177例患者。其中96例患者采用体外手缝端对端吻合,81例患者采用体外钉接侧对侧等肠吻合。采用单因素和多因素分析评估吻合技术对术后预后和恢复的影响。结果:采用体内吻合术的患者手术部位感染明显减少(0%对3%,p = 0.032),术后休息疼痛和术后应激疼痛(POD) 4明显减少(p = 0.028和p = 0.007),首次排便时间更早(POD 2对POD 3, p = 0.014),术后住院时间更短(5天对6天,p = 0.049)。两组间的总发病率、再手术率和吻合口漏率均无显著差异。多因素分析表明,体外吻合技术与术后恢复(定义为pod2首次大便,pod4饱餐耐受,pod6排泄)显著相关;OR 0.5 [0.2-0.9], p = 0.036)。结论:椎体内侧对侧吻合术可提高右半结肠CME微创切除术后的恢复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
8.70%
发文量
342
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Langenbeck''s Archives of Surgery aims to publish the best results in the field of clinical surgery and basic surgical research. The main focus is on providing the highest level of clinical research and clinically relevant basic research. The journal, published exclusively in English, will provide an international discussion forum for the controlled results of clinical surgery. The majority of published contributions will be original articles reporting on clinical data from general and visceral surgery, while endocrine surgery will also be covered. Papers on basic surgical principles from the fields of traumatology, vascular and thoracic surgery are also welcome. Evidence-based medicine is an important criterion for the acceptance of papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信