Evaluation of AI diagnostic systems for breast ultrasound: comparative analysis with radiologists and the effect of AI assistance.

IF 2.1 4区 医学
Sayumi Tsuyuzaki, Tomoyuki Fujioka, Emi Yamaga, Leona Katsuta, Mio Mori, Yuka Yashima, Mayumi Hara, Arisa Sato, Iichiroh Onishi, Jitsuro Tsukada, Tomoyuki Aruga, Kazunori Kubota, Ukihide Tateishi
{"title":"Evaluation of AI diagnostic systems for breast ultrasound: comparative analysis with radiologists and the effect of AI assistance.","authors":"Sayumi Tsuyuzaki, Tomoyuki Fujioka, Emi Yamaga, Leona Katsuta, Mio Mori, Yuka Yashima, Mayumi Hara, Arisa Sato, Iichiroh Onishi, Jitsuro Tsukada, Tomoyuki Aruga, Kazunori Kubota, Ukihide Tateishi","doi":"10.1007/s11604-025-01809-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of an artificial intelligence (AI)-based Computer-Aided Diagnosis (CADx) system for breast ultrasound, compare its performance with radiologists, and assess the effect of AI-assisted diagnosis. This study aims to investigate the system's ability to differentiate between benign and malignant breast masses among Japanese patients.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 171 breast mass ultrasound images (92 benign, 79 malignant). The AI system, BU-CAD™, provided Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) categorization, which was compared with the performance of three radiologists. Diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) were analyzed. Radiologists' diagnostic performance with and without AI assistance was also compared, and their reading time was measured using a stopwatch.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The AI system demonstrated a sensitivity of 91.1%, specificity of 92.4%, and an AUC of 0.948. It showed comparable diagnostic performance to Radiologist 1, with 10 years of experience in breast imaging (0.948 vs. 0.950; p = 0.893), and superior performance to Radiologist 2 (7 years of experience, 0.948 vs. 0.881; p = 0.015) and Radiologist 3 (3 years of experience, 0.948 vs. 0.832; p = 0.001). When comparing diagnostic performance with and without AI, the use of AI significantly improved the AUC for Radiologists 2 and 3 (p = 0.001 and 0.005, respectively). However, there was no significant difference for Radiologist 1 (p = 0.139). In terms of diagnosis time, the use of AI reduced the reading time for all radiologists. Although there was no significant difference in diagnostic performance between AI and Radiologist 1, the use of AI substantially decreased the diagnosis time for Radiologist 1 as well.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The AI system significantly improved diagnostic efficiency and accuracy, particularly for junior radiologists, highlighting its potential clinical utility in breast ultrasound diagnostics.</p>","PeriodicalId":14691,"journal":{"name":"Japanese Journal of Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-025-01809-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of an artificial intelligence (AI)-based Computer-Aided Diagnosis (CADx) system for breast ultrasound, compare its performance with radiologists, and assess the effect of AI-assisted diagnosis. This study aims to investigate the system's ability to differentiate between benign and malignant breast masses among Japanese patients.

Materials and methods: This retrospective study included 171 breast mass ultrasound images (92 benign, 79 malignant). The AI system, BU-CAD™, provided Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) categorization, which was compared with the performance of three radiologists. Diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) were analyzed. Radiologists' diagnostic performance with and without AI assistance was also compared, and their reading time was measured using a stopwatch.

Results: The AI system demonstrated a sensitivity of 91.1%, specificity of 92.4%, and an AUC of 0.948. It showed comparable diagnostic performance to Radiologist 1, with 10 years of experience in breast imaging (0.948 vs. 0.950; p = 0.893), and superior performance to Radiologist 2 (7 years of experience, 0.948 vs. 0.881; p = 0.015) and Radiologist 3 (3 years of experience, 0.948 vs. 0.832; p = 0.001). When comparing diagnostic performance with and without AI, the use of AI significantly improved the AUC for Radiologists 2 and 3 (p = 0.001 and 0.005, respectively). However, there was no significant difference for Radiologist 1 (p = 0.139). In terms of diagnosis time, the use of AI reduced the reading time for all radiologists. Although there was no significant difference in diagnostic performance between AI and Radiologist 1, the use of AI substantially decreased the diagnosis time for Radiologist 1 as well.

Conclusion: The AI system significantly improved diagnostic efficiency and accuracy, particularly for junior radiologists, highlighting its potential clinical utility in breast ultrasound diagnostics.

乳腺超声人工智能诊断系统的评估:与放射科医生的比较分析和人工智能辅助的效果。
目的:本研究的目的是评估基于人工智能(AI)的计算机辅助诊断(CADx)系统对乳腺超声的诊断准确性,将其与放射科医生的表现进行比较,并评估人工智能辅助诊断的效果。本研究旨在探讨该系统在日本患者中区分良性和恶性乳腺肿块的能力。材料与方法:回顾性研究171张乳腺肿块超声图像(92张为良性,79张为恶性)。AI系统BU-CAD™提供乳腺成像报告和数据系统(BI-RADS)分类,并将其与三名放射科医生的表现进行比较。分析诊断的准确性、敏感性、特异性和曲线下面积(AUC)。还比较了放射科医生在有和没有人工智能辅助的情况下的诊断表现,并使用秒表测量他们的阅读时间。结果:人工智能系统的灵敏度为91.1%,特异性为92.4%,AUC为0.948。它的诊断表现与具有10年乳腺影像学经验的放射科医师1相当(0.948比0.950;p = 0.893),且表现优于放射科医师2(7年经验,0.948比0.881;p = 0.015)和放射科医师3(3年经验,0.948比0.832;p = 0.001)。当比较使用和不使用人工智能的诊断性能时,人工智能的使用显著提高了放射科医生2和3的AUC (p分别= 0.001和0.005)。然而,放射科医师1组无显著差异(p = 0.139)。在诊断时间方面,人工智能的使用减少了所有放射科医生的阅读时间。虽然AI和放射科医生1的诊断表现没有显著差异,但AI的使用也大大缩短了放射科医生1的诊断时间。结论:人工智能系统显著提高了诊断效率和准确性,特别是对初级放射科医生,突出了其在乳腺超声诊断中的潜在临床应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Japanese Journal of Radiology
Japanese Journal of Radiology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
自引率
4.80%
发文量
133
期刊介绍: Japanese Journal of Radiology is a peer-reviewed journal, officially published by the Japan Radiological Society. The main purpose of the journal is to provide a forum for the publication of papers documenting recent advances and new developments in the field of radiology in medicine and biology. The scope of Japanese Journal of Radiology encompasses but is not restricted to diagnostic radiology, interventional radiology, radiation oncology, nuclear medicine, radiation physics, and radiation biology. Additionally, the journal covers technical and industrial innovations. The journal welcomes original articles, technical notes, review articles, pictorial essays and letters to the editor. The journal also provides announcements from the boards and the committees of the society. Membership in the Japan Radiological Society is not a prerequisite for submission. Contributions are welcomed from all parts of the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信