Frederic Balen, Louise Drumare, Florian Laclergerie, Mathilde Gaudreau-Simard, Pierre Guy, Xavier Dubucs
{"title":"Diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care ultrasonography for obstructive cause in patients with acute kidney injury: a prospective diagnosis cohort.","authors":"Frederic Balen, Louise Drumare, Florian Laclergerie, Mathilde Gaudreau-Simard, Pierre Guy, Xavier Dubucs","doi":"10.1007/s11739-025-03996-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to evaluate the test characteristics of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) in the diagnosis of obstructive acute kidney injury (AKI) in patients presenting with AKI to the Emergency Department (ED). This is a prospective diagnostic accuracy study that took place between July 6th, 2021 and July 6th, 2023 in the ED of an academic hospital. Adult patients visiting the ED and presenting with AKI were eligible for inclusion. Exclusion criteria were: pregnancy, dialysis-dependence, and kidney transplant. The index test was urinary tract POCUS (including kidneys and bladder assessment). The reference standard was obstructive origin of AKI using a two expert panel adjudication. One hundred and twenty-nine patients were included, with 22 (17%) obstructive AKI. For the diagnosis of obstructive AKI, POCUS had a sensitivity = 91% (95% CI = [71-99]), a specificity = 88% (95% CI = [80-93]), a PPV = 61% (95% CI = [42-77]), a NPV = 98% (95% CI = [93-100]), a LR + = 7.58 (95% CI = [4.42-12.67]) and a LR - = 0.1 (95% CI = [0.03-0.36]). Our study suggests that POCUS has good sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of an obstructive origin in presenting to the ED with AKI. Given a NPV of 98%, POCUS has great potential as a tool to rule out obstructive AKI, while its PPV of 61% suggests that positive POCUS likely requires confirmation with radiology-performed ultrasound. Trial registration number: NCT06190522.</p>","PeriodicalId":13662,"journal":{"name":"Internal and Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internal and Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-025-03996-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the test characteristics of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) in the diagnosis of obstructive acute kidney injury (AKI) in patients presenting with AKI to the Emergency Department (ED). This is a prospective diagnostic accuracy study that took place between July 6th, 2021 and July 6th, 2023 in the ED of an academic hospital. Adult patients visiting the ED and presenting with AKI were eligible for inclusion. Exclusion criteria were: pregnancy, dialysis-dependence, and kidney transplant. The index test was urinary tract POCUS (including kidneys and bladder assessment). The reference standard was obstructive origin of AKI using a two expert panel adjudication. One hundred and twenty-nine patients were included, with 22 (17%) obstructive AKI. For the diagnosis of obstructive AKI, POCUS had a sensitivity = 91% (95% CI = [71-99]), a specificity = 88% (95% CI = [80-93]), a PPV = 61% (95% CI = [42-77]), a NPV = 98% (95% CI = [93-100]), a LR + = 7.58 (95% CI = [4.42-12.67]) and a LR - = 0.1 (95% CI = [0.03-0.36]). Our study suggests that POCUS has good sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of an obstructive origin in presenting to the ED with AKI. Given a NPV of 98%, POCUS has great potential as a tool to rule out obstructive AKI, while its PPV of 61% suggests that positive POCUS likely requires confirmation with radiology-performed ultrasound. Trial registration number: NCT06190522.
期刊介绍:
Internal and Emergency Medicine (IEM) is an independent, international, English-language, peer-reviewed journal designed for internists and emergency physicians. IEM publishes a variety of manuscript types including Original investigations, Review articles, Letters to the Editor, Editorials and Commentaries. Occasionally IEM accepts unsolicited Reviews, Commentaries or Editorials. The journal is divided into three sections, i.e., Internal Medicine, Emergency Medicine and Clinical Evidence and Health Technology Assessment, with three separate editorial boards. In the Internal Medicine section, invited Case records and Physical examinations, devoted to underlining the role of a clinical approach in selected clinical cases, are also published. The Emergency Medicine section will include a Morbidity and Mortality Report and an Airway Forum concerning the management of difficult airway problems. As far as Critical Care is becoming an integral part of Emergency Medicine, a new sub-section will report the literature that concerns the interface not only for the care of the critical patient in the Emergency Department, but also in the Intensive Care Unit. Finally, in the Clinical Evidence and Health Technology Assessment section brief discussions of topics of evidence-based medicine (Cochrane’s corner) and Research updates are published. IEM encourages letters of rebuttal and criticism of published articles. Topics of interest include all subjects that relate to the science and practice of Internal and Emergency Medicine.