Navigating advanced lung cancer care, patient-physician alliance, cancer stigma, and psychosocial support in Asia-Pacific: perspectives from patients, caregivers, and physicians.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Future oncology Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-08 DOI:10.1080/14796694.2025.2499511
Chee Khoon Lee, Xue Yang, Yasushi Goto, Kang Yun Lee, Hyung Seok Yim, Mark Brooke, Hisakazu Aoshima, Emiko Ando, Yiting Liu, Jane Tsai, Grace Kah Mun Low, Naomi Kishiwada, Simone Marie Cheng, Divashini Rajendran, Regina Gowindah, Soe Pwint Phoo Mon, Min Hee Hong
{"title":"Navigating advanced lung cancer care, patient-physician alliance, cancer stigma, and psychosocial support in Asia-Pacific: perspectives from patients, caregivers, and physicians.","authors":"Chee Khoon Lee, Xue Yang, Yasushi Goto, Kang Yun Lee, Hyung Seok Yim, Mark Brooke, Hisakazu Aoshima, Emiko Ando, Yiting Liu, Jane Tsai, Grace Kah Mun Low, Naomi Kishiwada, Simone Marie Cheng, Divashini Rajendran, Regina Gowindah, Soe Pwint Phoo Mon, Min Hee Hong","doi":"10.1080/14796694.2025.2499511","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Factors influencing holistic lung cancer care among advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients in Asia-Pacific are understudied. We identified gaps in lung cancer care from patients, caregivers, and physicians in Australia, Japan, Mainland China, South Korea, and Taiwan.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Qualitative interviews and quantitative surveys were conducted among NSCLC patients with limited targeted treatment options, caregivers, and physicians. Patient-caregiver paired interviews (<i>n</i> = 15) were analyzed narratively and thematically; survey findings (70 patients, 106 physicians) were summarized descriptively. Descriptive analyses were performed with no formal hypothesis testing.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>While patients (53-66%) felt able to care for their condition, 47% were unaware of genetic mutations and 46% perceived delays in diagnosis (41-44% were unaware of symptoms/severity). Most physicians (78-90%) prioritized treatment discussions, 51% decided for patients, and 69% encouraged patient-led decisions. Patients (61-77%) relied on physician decisions; 71-76% prioritizing reduced recurrence and minimal side effects over physician recommendations (53%). Although patients (66%) felt cared for by their doctors, 24-31% felt their mental/physical well-being was not proactively addressed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study identified significant gaps in lung cancer care, including patients' suboptimal disease and treatment knowledge, limited patient-physician shared decision-making, cancer stigma, and inadequate psychosocial support; underscoring the need for tailored interventions in Asia-Pacific.</p>","PeriodicalId":12672,"journal":{"name":"Future oncology","volume":" ","pages":"2851-2865"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12439555/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Future oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14796694.2025.2499511","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Factors influencing holistic lung cancer care among advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients in Asia-Pacific are understudied. We identified gaps in lung cancer care from patients, caregivers, and physicians in Australia, Japan, Mainland China, South Korea, and Taiwan.

Methods: Qualitative interviews and quantitative surveys were conducted among NSCLC patients with limited targeted treatment options, caregivers, and physicians. Patient-caregiver paired interviews (n = 15) were analyzed narratively and thematically; survey findings (70 patients, 106 physicians) were summarized descriptively. Descriptive analyses were performed with no formal hypothesis testing.

Findings: While patients (53-66%) felt able to care for their condition, 47% were unaware of genetic mutations and 46% perceived delays in diagnosis (41-44% were unaware of symptoms/severity). Most physicians (78-90%) prioritized treatment discussions, 51% decided for patients, and 69% encouraged patient-led decisions. Patients (61-77%) relied on physician decisions; 71-76% prioritizing reduced recurrence and minimal side effects over physician recommendations (53%). Although patients (66%) felt cared for by their doctors, 24-31% felt their mental/physical well-being was not proactively addressed.

Conclusion: This study identified significant gaps in lung cancer care, including patients' suboptimal disease and treatment knowledge, limited patient-physician shared decision-making, cancer stigma, and inadequate psychosocial support; underscoring the need for tailored interventions in Asia-Pacific.

亚太地区晚期肺癌治疗、医患联盟、癌症污名和社会心理支持的导航:来自患者、护理人员和医生的观点。
背景:影响亚太地区晚期/转移性非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者整体肺癌治疗的因素尚未得到充分研究。我们发现澳大利亚、日本、中国大陆、韩国和台湾的患者、护理人员和医生在肺癌护理方面存在差距。方法:对靶向治疗方案有限的非小细胞肺癌患者、护理人员和医生进行定性访谈和定量调查。对患者-护理人员配对访谈(n = 15)进行叙事和主题分析;对调查结果(70例患者,106名医生)进行描述性总结。描述性分析没有进行正式的假设检验。研究结果:虽然患者(53-66%)能够照顾自己的病情,但47%不知道基因突变,46%认为诊断延误(41-44%不知道症状/严重程度)。大多数医生(78-90%)优先考虑治疗讨论,51%为患者做决定,69%鼓励患者主导决定。患者(61-77%)依赖医生的决定;71-76%的人优先考虑减少复发和最小化副作用,而不是医生建议(53%)。虽然患者(66%)感到受到医生的照顾,但24-31%的患者认为他们的精神/身体健康没有得到积极的解决。结论:本研究确定了肺癌护理方面的显著差距,包括患者对疾病和治疗知识的不理想,有限的医患共享决策,癌症污名化和不充分的社会心理支持;强调有必要在亚太地区采取有针对性的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Future oncology
Future oncology ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.00%
发文量
335
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Future Oncology (ISSN 1479-6694) provides a forum for a new era of cancer care. The journal focuses on the most important advances and highlights their relevance in the clinical setting. Furthermore, Future Oncology delivers essential information in concise, at-a-glance article formats - vital in delivering information to an increasingly time-constrained community. The journal takes a forward-looking stance toward the scientific and clinical issues, together with the economic and policy issues that confront us in this new era of cancer care. The journal includes literature awareness such as the latest developments in radiotherapy and immunotherapy, concise commentary and analysis, and full review articles all of which provide key findings, translational to the clinical setting.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信