Tamas Ungi, Catherine O Wu, Sarah J D Dance, Charles Lawall, Charles Nagel, Gregg Khodorov, Robert W Ford, Kevin Cleary, Gabor Fichtinger, Matthew E Oetgen, Daniel P Borschneck
{"title":"Bone-enhanced 3D ultrasound: a non-ionizing alternative for pediatric scoliosis assessment.","authors":"Tamas Ungi, Catherine O Wu, Sarah J D Dance, Charles Lawall, Charles Nagel, Gregg Khodorov, Robert W Ford, Kevin Cleary, Gabor Fichtinger, Matthew E Oetgen, Daniel P Borschneck","doi":"10.1007/s00586-025-08969-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Scoliosis affects up to 5% of the population, and early detection is crucial to prevent progression and surgical intervention. X-ray imaging remains the standard for scoliosis assessment, but repeated exposure to ionizing radiation increases cancer risks, particularly in pediatric patients. This study evaluates bone-enhanced 3D ultrasound (BEUS) as a non-ionizing alternative for scoliosis measurement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a comparative analysis of X-ray and BEUS measurements in 34 pediatric patients. Each participant underwent same-day spinal imaging with both modalities. Scoliosis angles were measured independently by two observers using anatomical landmarks visible in both imaging modalities. Statistical tests assessed agreement between X-ray and BEUS, inter-observer variability, and potential biases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Minimal inter-observer variability was found (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.98). 93% of BEUS measurements fell within a clinically acceptable ± 5° range of X-ray values. Regression analysis identified age and scoliosis severity as significant predictors of measurement differences (p < 0.05). In particular, error increased with scoliosis severity, with curvatures above 40° showing significant deviation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>BEUS is a promising alternative for scoliosis assessment, demonstrating strong reliability for mild to moderate cases while eliminating radiation exposure. BEUS holds potential for routine scoliosis monitoring, reducing reliance on X-rays and minimizing radiation risk in pediatric patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":12323,"journal":{"name":"European Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-025-08969-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Scoliosis affects up to 5% of the population, and early detection is crucial to prevent progression and surgical intervention. X-ray imaging remains the standard for scoliosis assessment, but repeated exposure to ionizing radiation increases cancer risks, particularly in pediatric patients. This study evaluates bone-enhanced 3D ultrasound (BEUS) as a non-ionizing alternative for scoliosis measurement.
Methods: We conducted a comparative analysis of X-ray and BEUS measurements in 34 pediatric patients. Each participant underwent same-day spinal imaging with both modalities. Scoliosis angles were measured independently by two observers using anatomical landmarks visible in both imaging modalities. Statistical tests assessed agreement between X-ray and BEUS, inter-observer variability, and potential biases.
Results: Minimal inter-observer variability was found (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.98). 93% of BEUS measurements fell within a clinically acceptable ± 5° range of X-ray values. Regression analysis identified age and scoliosis severity as significant predictors of measurement differences (p < 0.05). In particular, error increased with scoliosis severity, with curvatures above 40° showing significant deviation.
Conclusion: BEUS is a promising alternative for scoliosis assessment, demonstrating strong reliability for mild to moderate cases while eliminating radiation exposure. BEUS holds potential for routine scoliosis monitoring, reducing reliance on X-rays and minimizing radiation risk in pediatric patients.
期刊介绍:
"European Spine Journal" is a publication founded in response to the increasing trend toward specialization in spinal surgery and spinal pathology in general. The Journal is devoted to all spine related disciplines, including functional and surgical anatomy of the spine, biomechanics and pathophysiology, diagnostic procedures, and neurology, surgery and outcomes. The aim of "European Spine Journal" is to support the further development of highly innovative spine treatments including but not restricted to surgery and to provide an integrated and balanced view of diagnostic, research and treatment procedures as well as outcomes that will enhance effective collaboration among specialists worldwide. The “European Spine Journal” also participates in education by means of videos, interactive meetings and the endorsement of educative efforts.
Official publication of EUROSPINE, The Spine Society of Europe