Bone-enhanced 3D ultrasound: a non-ionizing alternative for pediatric scoliosis assessment.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Tamas Ungi, Catherine O Wu, Sarah J D Dance, Charles Lawall, Charles Nagel, Gregg Khodorov, Robert W Ford, Kevin Cleary, Gabor Fichtinger, Matthew E Oetgen, Daniel P Borschneck
{"title":"Bone-enhanced 3D ultrasound: a non-ionizing alternative for pediatric scoliosis assessment.","authors":"Tamas Ungi, Catherine O Wu, Sarah J D Dance, Charles Lawall, Charles Nagel, Gregg Khodorov, Robert W Ford, Kevin Cleary, Gabor Fichtinger, Matthew E Oetgen, Daniel P Borschneck","doi":"10.1007/s00586-025-08969-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Scoliosis affects up to 5% of the population, and early detection is crucial to prevent progression and surgical intervention. X-ray imaging remains the standard for scoliosis assessment, but repeated exposure to ionizing radiation increases cancer risks, particularly in pediatric patients. This study evaluates bone-enhanced 3D ultrasound (BEUS) as a non-ionizing alternative for scoliosis measurement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a comparative analysis of X-ray and BEUS measurements in 34 pediatric patients. Each participant underwent same-day spinal imaging with both modalities. Scoliosis angles were measured independently by two observers using anatomical landmarks visible in both imaging modalities. Statistical tests assessed agreement between X-ray and BEUS, inter-observer variability, and potential biases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Minimal inter-observer variability was found (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.98). 93% of BEUS measurements fell within a clinically acceptable ± 5° range of X-ray values. Regression analysis identified age and scoliosis severity as significant predictors of measurement differences (p < 0.05). In particular, error increased with scoliosis severity, with curvatures above 40° showing significant deviation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>BEUS is a promising alternative for scoliosis assessment, demonstrating strong reliability for mild to moderate cases while eliminating radiation exposure. BEUS holds potential for routine scoliosis monitoring, reducing reliance on X-rays and minimizing radiation risk in pediatric patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":12323,"journal":{"name":"European Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-025-08969-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Scoliosis affects up to 5% of the population, and early detection is crucial to prevent progression and surgical intervention. X-ray imaging remains the standard for scoliosis assessment, but repeated exposure to ionizing radiation increases cancer risks, particularly in pediatric patients. This study evaluates bone-enhanced 3D ultrasound (BEUS) as a non-ionizing alternative for scoliosis measurement.

Methods: We conducted a comparative analysis of X-ray and BEUS measurements in 34 pediatric patients. Each participant underwent same-day spinal imaging with both modalities. Scoliosis angles were measured independently by two observers using anatomical landmarks visible in both imaging modalities. Statistical tests assessed agreement between X-ray and BEUS, inter-observer variability, and potential biases.

Results: Minimal inter-observer variability was found (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.98). 93% of BEUS measurements fell within a clinically acceptable ± 5° range of X-ray values. Regression analysis identified age and scoliosis severity as significant predictors of measurement differences (p < 0.05). In particular, error increased with scoliosis severity, with curvatures above 40° showing significant deviation.

Conclusion: BEUS is a promising alternative for scoliosis assessment, demonstrating strong reliability for mild to moderate cases while eliminating radiation exposure. BEUS holds potential for routine scoliosis monitoring, reducing reliance on X-rays and minimizing radiation risk in pediatric patients.

骨增强3D超声:儿童脊柱侧凸评估的非电离替代方法。
目的:脊柱侧凸影响高达5%的人口,早期发现对于防止进展和手术干预至关重要。x射线成像仍然是评估脊柱侧凸的标准,但反复暴露于电离辐射会增加癌症风险,尤其是儿科患者。本研究评估骨增强3D超声(BEUS)作为脊柱侧凸测量的非电离替代方法。方法:对34例儿科患者的x线和BEUS测量进行对比分析。每个参与者在同一天接受了两种方式的脊柱成像。脊柱侧凸角度由两名观察员独立测量,使用两种成像方式可见的解剖标志。统计测试评估了x射线和BEUS之间的一致性、观察者之间的可变性和潜在的偏差。结果:观察者间差异最小(类内相关系数= 0.98)。93%的BEUS测量值落在临床可接受的x射线值±5°范围内。回归分析发现,年龄和脊柱侧凸严重程度是测量差异的重要预测因素(p结论:BEUS是一种很有希望的脊柱侧凸评估替代方法,在消除辐射暴露的同时,对轻度至中度病例显示出很强的可靠性。BEUS具有常规脊柱侧凸监测的潜力,减少了对x射线的依赖,并将儿科患者的辐射风险降至最低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Spine Journal
European Spine Journal 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
10.70%
发文量
373
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: "European Spine Journal" is a publication founded in response to the increasing trend toward specialization in spinal surgery and spinal pathology in general. The Journal is devoted to all spine related disciplines, including functional and surgical anatomy of the spine, biomechanics and pathophysiology, diagnostic procedures, and neurology, surgery and outcomes. The aim of "European Spine Journal" is to support the further development of highly innovative spine treatments including but not restricted to surgery and to provide an integrated and balanced view of diagnostic, research and treatment procedures as well as outcomes that will enhance effective collaboration among specialists worldwide. The “European Spine Journal” also participates in education by means of videos, interactive meetings and the endorsement of educative efforts. Official publication of EUROSPINE, The Spine Society of Europe
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信