Comparative Analysis of TA102 and WP2 uvrA(pKM101) Strains in Detecting Nitrosamine Mutagens in the Enhanced Ames Test

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Rushikesh M. Shukla, Darshan T. Valani, Chetan K. Kajavadara, Satyam N. Patel, Rajesh J. Patel, Laxit K. Bhatt, Rajesh Sundar, Mukul R. Jain
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of TA102 and WP2 uvrA(pKM101) Strains in Detecting Nitrosamine Mutagens in the Enhanced Ames Test","authors":"Rushikesh M. Shukla,&nbsp;Darshan T. Valani,&nbsp;Chetan K. Kajavadara,&nbsp;Satyam N. Patel,&nbsp;Rajesh J. Patel,&nbsp;Laxit K. Bhatt,&nbsp;Rajesh Sundar,&nbsp;Mukul R. Jain","doi":"10.1002/em.70018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>The Ames test is a fundamental assay for evaluating chemical mutagenicity, particularly for nitrosamines, which are widespread environmental and pharmaceutical contaminants. To improve sensitivity, regulatory agencies have endorsed the enhanced Ames test (EAT), which incorporates five tester strains, a 30-min pre-incubation step, and metabolic activation using both rat and hamster liver S9 fractions. While <i>Salmonella typhimurium</i> TA102 is known for its sensitivity to oxidative mutagens, its performance under EAT conditions has not been fully characterized. This study evaluated the mutagenic response of TA102 using two nitrosamine positive controls: <i>N</i>-nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA) and 1-cyclopentyl-4-nitrosopiperazine (CPNP). <i>E. coli</i> WP2 <i>uvr</i>A(pKM101) showed consistent mutagenic responses to both NDMA and CPNP, consistent with existing EAT data. TA102 demonstrated a robust response to NDMA but not to CPNP, suggesting limited sensitivity to certain nitrosamines. These findings support the continued use of WP2 <i>uvr</i>A(pKM101) in EAT protocols and highlight the limited utility of TA102 for comprehensive nitrosamine mutagenicity assessment.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":11791,"journal":{"name":"Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis","volume":"66 5","pages":"291-297"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/em.70018","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Ames test is a fundamental assay for evaluating chemical mutagenicity, particularly for nitrosamines, which are widespread environmental and pharmaceutical contaminants. To improve sensitivity, regulatory agencies have endorsed the enhanced Ames test (EAT), which incorporates five tester strains, a 30-min pre-incubation step, and metabolic activation using both rat and hamster liver S9 fractions. While Salmonella typhimurium TA102 is known for its sensitivity to oxidative mutagens, its performance under EAT conditions has not been fully characterized. This study evaluated the mutagenic response of TA102 using two nitrosamine positive controls: N-nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA) and 1-cyclopentyl-4-nitrosopiperazine (CPNP). E. coli WP2 uvrA(pKM101) showed consistent mutagenic responses to both NDMA and CPNP, consistent with existing EAT data. TA102 demonstrated a robust response to NDMA but not to CPNP, suggesting limited sensitivity to certain nitrosamines. These findings support the continued use of WP2 uvrA(pKM101) in EAT protocols and highlight the limited utility of TA102 for comprehensive nitrosamine mutagenicity assessment.

TA102与WP2 uvrA(pKM101)菌株在增强Ames试验中检测亚硝胺类诱变物的比较分析
Ames试验是评价化学致突变性的基本方法,特别是亚硝胺,亚硝胺是一种广泛存在的环境和药物污染物。为了提高敏感性,监管机构已经批准了增强的Ames试验(EAT),该试验包括5个试验菌株,30分钟的预孵化步骤,以及使用大鼠和仓鼠肝脏S9组分进行代谢激活。虽然鼠伤寒沙门氏菌TA102以其对氧化诱变剂的敏感性而闻名,但其在EAT条件下的表现尚未得到充分表征。本研究采用两种亚硝胺阳性对照:n -亚硝基二甲胺(NDMA)和1-环戊基-4-亚硝基哌嗪(CPNP)来评价TA102的致突变性。大肠杆菌WP2 uvrA(pKM101)对NDMA和CPNP均表现出一致的致突变反应,与现有的EAT数据一致。TA102对NDMA表现出强烈的反应,但对CPNP没有反应,表明对某些亚硝胺的敏感性有限。这些发现支持在EAT方案中继续使用WP2 uvrA(pKM101),并强调了TA102在全面亚硝胺致突变性评估中的有限效用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
10.70%
发文量
52
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis publishes original research manuscripts, reviews and commentaries on topics related to six general areas, with an emphasis on subject matter most suited for the readership of EMM as outlined below. The journal is intended for investigators in fields such as molecular biology, biochemistry, microbiology, genetics and epigenetics, genomics and epigenomics, cancer research, neurobiology, heritable mutation, radiation biology, toxicology, and molecular & environmental epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信