Developing benchmarking indicators for Australian virtual emergency departments: a Delphi study.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Timothy J Schultz, Andrew Partington, Pamela Everingham, Mark Morphett, Jackie Davidson, Suzanne M Miller, Kim Hansen, Nicole Mitchell, Ian Dey, Jon Karnon
{"title":"Developing benchmarking indicators for Australian virtual emergency departments: a Delphi study.","authors":"Timothy J Schultz, Andrew Partington, Pamela Everingham, Mark Morphett, Jackie Davidson, Suzanne M Miller, Kim Hansen, Nicole Mitchell, Ian Dey, Jon Karnon","doi":"10.1136/emermed-2025-214904","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>There is a lack of indicators to guide quality improvement activities in virtual emergency medicine internationally. We developed quality indicators for use across a collaboration of four metropolitan virtual ED (VED) settings in four Australian states. The services deliver ED care directly to patients, in consultation with paramedics, and as virtual care coordination.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The model of care and use of potential indicators at each site were described using interviews and combined with literature review to develop a set of 27 candidate benchmarking indicators. These were refined using a three-stage Delphi study conducted between November 2022 and May 2023. The first stage used a survey to assess the indicators' feasibility and importance, synonyms and draft definitions. These results were fed back to participants for refinement during discussions and written review of revised indicators and definitions across two subsequent stages.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A definition for VED care was proposed: 'An episode of care between patients and/or care providers, occurring remotely, using any form of communication or information technologies, for conditions that would otherwise result in a physical presentation for emergency care.' Across Delphi rounds 1 and 2, some proposed indicators were removed, and new types of indicators were added. In rounds 2 and 3, 24 and 23 indicators, respectively, were reviewed, and the final indicator set comprised 16 indicators. The majority (15) were readily mapped to the six Institute of Medicine Domains of Quality (efficient (n=2), effective (n=5), equitable (n=2), patient centred (n=2), safe (n=2) and timely (n=2)) and all 16 mapped to the National Quality Forum's telehealth quality indicators (access to care (n=2), effectiveness (n=8), experience (n=4), financial impact/cost (n=2)).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is enthusiasm for a national benchmarking collaborative across four Australian VED services and states. An identified set of 16 indicators and definitions can be further validated with consumers and piloted.</p>","PeriodicalId":11532,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Medicine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency Medicine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2025-214904","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: There is a lack of indicators to guide quality improvement activities in virtual emergency medicine internationally. We developed quality indicators for use across a collaboration of four metropolitan virtual ED (VED) settings in four Australian states. The services deliver ED care directly to patients, in consultation with paramedics, and as virtual care coordination.

Methods: The model of care and use of potential indicators at each site were described using interviews and combined with literature review to develop a set of 27 candidate benchmarking indicators. These were refined using a three-stage Delphi study conducted between November 2022 and May 2023. The first stage used a survey to assess the indicators' feasibility and importance, synonyms and draft definitions. These results were fed back to participants for refinement during discussions and written review of revised indicators and definitions across two subsequent stages.

Results: A definition for VED care was proposed: 'An episode of care between patients and/or care providers, occurring remotely, using any form of communication or information technologies, for conditions that would otherwise result in a physical presentation for emergency care.' Across Delphi rounds 1 and 2, some proposed indicators were removed, and new types of indicators were added. In rounds 2 and 3, 24 and 23 indicators, respectively, were reviewed, and the final indicator set comprised 16 indicators. The majority (15) were readily mapped to the six Institute of Medicine Domains of Quality (efficient (n=2), effective (n=5), equitable (n=2), patient centred (n=2), safe (n=2) and timely (n=2)) and all 16 mapped to the National Quality Forum's telehealth quality indicators (access to care (n=2), effectiveness (n=8), experience (n=4), financial impact/cost (n=2)).

Conclusion: There is enthusiasm for a national benchmarking collaborative across four Australian VED services and states. An identified set of 16 indicators and definitions can be further validated with consumers and piloted.

制定澳大利亚虚拟急诊科基准指标:德尔菲研究。
导言:国际上缺乏指导虚拟急诊医学质量改进活动的指标。我们开发了质量指标,用于在澳大利亚四个州的四个大都市虚拟教育(VED)设置的合作中使用。这些服务直接向患者提供急诊科护理,与护理人员协商,并作为虚拟护理协调。方法:采用访谈和文献回顾相结合的方法,描述了每个站点潜在指标的护理和使用模式,并制定了一套27个候选基准指标。这些都是通过在2022年11月至2023年5月期间进行的三阶段德尔菲研究来完善的。第一阶段使用调查来评估指标的可行性和重要性、同义词和定义草案。这些结果反馈给参与者,以便在随后两个阶段对修订后的指标和定义进行讨论和书面审查时加以改进。结果:提出了急诊护理的定义:“患者和/或护理提供者之间的护理事件,远程发生,使用任何形式的通信或信息技术,否则会导致身体出现紧急护理。”在德尔菲第1轮和第2轮中,一些提议的指标被删除,并增加了新的指标类型。在第二轮和第三轮中,分别审查了24项和23项指标,最后的指标集包括16项指标。大多数指标(15项)可轻松映射到医学研究所的六个质量领域(高效(n=2)、有效(n=5)、公平(n=2)、以患者为中心(n=2)、安全(n=2)和及时(n=2)),所有16项指标均映射到国家质量论坛的远程保健质量指标(获得护理(n=2)、有效性(n=8)、经验(n=4)、财务影响/成本(n=2))。结论:人们热衷于在四个澳大利亚VED服务和州之间开展全国性的基准合作。一套已确定的16项指标和定义可在消费者中进一步验证并试行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Emergency Medicine Journal
Emergency Medicine Journal 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
6.50%
发文量
262
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Emergency Medicine Journal is a leading international journal reporting developments and advances in emergency medicine and acute care. It has relevance to all specialties involved in the management of emergencies in the hospital and prehospital environment. Each issue contains editorials, reviews, original research, evidence based reviews, letters and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信