Exploring Ototoxicity Associated with Capmatinib: Insights from a Real-World Data Analysis of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) Database.

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Clinical Epidemiology Pub Date : 2025-06-03 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/CLEP.S528454
Yuhao Lin, Siqi Xu, Muling Deng, Yongli Cao, Jianming Ding, Tingting Lin
{"title":"Exploring Ototoxicity Associated with Capmatinib: Insights from a Real-World Data Analysis of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) Database.","authors":"Yuhao Lin, Siqi Xu, Muling Deng, Yongli Cao, Jianming Ding, Tingting Lin","doi":"10.2147/CLEP.S528454","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Capmatinib was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2020 for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer with MET exon 14 mutation (METex14). Real-world studies on the safety of Capmatinib are still lacking. The aim of this study was to explore the significant adverse drug reactions (ADRs) associated with Capmatinib through the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We employed the reported odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN), and the Empirical Bayes Geometric Mean (EBGM) as primary algorithms for the disproportionality analysis. Adverse events (AEs) were classified as adverse drug reactions (ADRs) solely upon fulfillment of criteria across all four algorithms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In our study, there were 1767 cases explicitly attributed to Capmatinib. A total of 38 ADRs in preferred terms (PTs) level in 14 system-organ categories (SOCs) were identified after filtering. Notably, unexpected SOC \"Ear and labyrinth disorders\" and PTs \"hypoacusis\" and \"deafness\" were identified, without being specified in the drug label.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study identified unexpected ADRs associated with Capmatinib, with a focus on ototoxicity-related events, underscoring the need for enhanced clinical monitoring and further investigation into the underlying mechanisms.</p>","PeriodicalId":10362,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Epidemiology","volume":"17 ","pages":"513-521"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12145114/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S528454","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Capmatinib was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2020 for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer with MET exon 14 mutation (METex14). Real-world studies on the safety of Capmatinib are still lacking. The aim of this study was to explore the significant adverse drug reactions (ADRs) associated with Capmatinib through the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database.

Methods: We employed the reported odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN), and the Empirical Bayes Geometric Mean (EBGM) as primary algorithms for the disproportionality analysis. Adverse events (AEs) were classified as adverse drug reactions (ADRs) solely upon fulfillment of criteria across all four algorithms.

Results: In our study, there were 1767 cases explicitly attributed to Capmatinib. A total of 38 ADRs in preferred terms (PTs) level in 14 system-organ categories (SOCs) were identified after filtering. Notably, unexpected SOC "Ear and labyrinth disorders" and PTs "hypoacusis" and "deafness" were identified, without being specified in the drug label.

Conclusion: Our study identified unexpected ADRs associated with Capmatinib, with a focus on ototoxicity-related events, underscoring the need for enhanced clinical monitoring and further investigation into the underlying mechanisms.

探索与卡马替尼相关的耳毒性:来自FDA不良事件报告系统(FAERS)数据库的真实数据分析的见解。
背景:Capmatinib于2020年获得美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)批准,用于治疗MET外显子14突变(METex14)的非小细胞肺癌。关于卡马替尼安全性的实际研究仍然缺乏。本研究的目的是通过FDA不良事件报告系统(FAERS)数据库探讨与Capmatinib相关的重大药物不良反应(adr)。方法:采用报告优势比(ROR)、比例报告比(PRR)、贝叶斯置信传播神经网络(BCPNN)和经验贝叶斯几何平均(EBGM)作为歧化分析的主要算法。不良事件(ae)仅在满足所有四种算法的标准后被归类为药物不良反应(adr)。结果:在我们的研究中,有1767例病例明确归因于卡马替尼。筛选后,共确定了14个系统器官类别(soc)中优选术语(PTs)水平的38个adr。值得注意的是,意外的SOC“耳朵和迷路障碍”和PTs“听觉减退”和“耳聋”被识别出来,而药物标签中没有具体说明。结论:我们的研究确定了与Capmatinib相关的意外不良反应,重点是耳毒性相关事件,强调了加强临床监测和进一步研究潜在机制的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Epidemiology
Clinical Epidemiology Medicine-Epidemiology
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
5.10%
发文量
169
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Epidemiology is an international, peer reviewed, open access journal. Clinical Epidemiology focuses on the application of epidemiological principles and questions relating to patients and clinical care in terms of prevention, diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment. Clinical Epidemiology welcomes papers covering these topics in form of original research and systematic reviews. Clinical Epidemiology has a special interest in international electronic medical patient records and other routine health care data, especially as applied to safety of medical interventions, clinical utility of diagnostic procedures, understanding short- and long-term clinical course of diseases, clinical epidemiological and biostatistical methods, and systematic reviews. When considering submission of a paper utilizing publicly-available data, authors should ensure that such studies add significantly to the body of knowledge and that they use appropriate validated methods for identifying health outcomes. The journal has launched special series describing existing data sources for clinical epidemiology, international health care systems and validation studies of algorithms based on databases and registries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信