Shoulder irritability differs by standardised measures of movement-evoked pain.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Abigail W Anderson, William J Hanney
{"title":"Shoulder irritability differs by standardised measures of movement-evoked pain.","authors":"Abigail W Anderson, William J Hanney","doi":"10.1177/02692155251348853","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveIrritability utilises pain behaviour during movement to inform examination and treatment intensity. Standardised measures of movement-evoked pain have not previously been applied to irritability. This study examined whether shoulder pain during standard movements differed by irritability category and level.DesignObservational studySettingResearch laboratoryParticipantsParticipants with shoulder pain (n=40)InterventionIrritability was assessed followed by psychological questionnaires (Fear of Pain Questionnaire, Pain Catastrophizing Scale, Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia, Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression, State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory, Pain Anxiety Symptoms Scale, Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire), quantitative sensory testing (pressure pain threshold, heat pain threshold, conditioned pain modulation, temporal summation), and movement-evoked pain (lifting, functional movements, repetitive movements, self-selected task).Main measuresShoulder pain intensity was assessed before, during, and after each task. A t-test and ANOVA examined differences in each movement task by irritability.ResultsPain during the standardised lifting task was significantly higher in individuals categorised as irritable (p=0.03) than not irritable, as well as high irritability compared to moderate (p<0.01). Pain during functional movements was significantly higher in individuals categorised as irritable (p<0.01) compared to not, as well as high compared to low irritability (p<0.01). Performance on repetitive tasks did not significantly differ by irritability category (p=0.63) or level (p=0.44). Change in pain ratings during the self-selected task did not differ by irritability category (p=0.67) or level (p=0.95).ConclusionsPain during standardised, functional movements may differentiate irritability. Clinicians may want to consider functional testing in which pain is assessed during movement for patients with irritable shoulder pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":10441,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"2692155251348853"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155251348853","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectiveIrritability utilises pain behaviour during movement to inform examination and treatment intensity. Standardised measures of movement-evoked pain have not previously been applied to irritability. This study examined whether shoulder pain during standard movements differed by irritability category and level.DesignObservational studySettingResearch laboratoryParticipantsParticipants with shoulder pain (n=40)InterventionIrritability was assessed followed by psychological questionnaires (Fear of Pain Questionnaire, Pain Catastrophizing Scale, Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia, Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression, State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory, Pain Anxiety Symptoms Scale, Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire), quantitative sensory testing (pressure pain threshold, heat pain threshold, conditioned pain modulation, temporal summation), and movement-evoked pain (lifting, functional movements, repetitive movements, self-selected task).Main measuresShoulder pain intensity was assessed before, during, and after each task. A t-test and ANOVA examined differences in each movement task by irritability.ResultsPain during the standardised lifting task was significantly higher in individuals categorised as irritable (p=0.03) than not irritable, as well as high irritability compared to moderate (p<0.01). Pain during functional movements was significantly higher in individuals categorised as irritable (p<0.01) compared to not, as well as high compared to low irritability (p<0.01). Performance on repetitive tasks did not significantly differ by irritability category (p=0.63) or level (p=0.44). Change in pain ratings during the self-selected task did not differ by irritability category (p=0.67) or level (p=0.95).ConclusionsPain during standardised, functional movements may differentiate irritability. Clinicians may want to consider functional testing in which pain is assessed during movement for patients with irritable shoulder pain.

肩部易怒因运动引起疼痛的标准化测量而有所不同。
目的易怒症利用运动时的疼痛行为提示检查和治疗强度。运动诱发疼痛的标准化测量方法以前还没有应用于易怒。本研究考察了在标准运动中肩痛是否因易怒类别和程度的不同而不同。设计:观察性研究设置:研究实验室对肩痛患者(n=40)进行易怒性评估,随后进行心理问卷(疼痛恐惧问卷、疼痛灾难化量表、坦帕运动恐惧症量表、流行病学研究中心抑郁量表、状态-特质愤怒表达量表、疼痛焦虑症状量表、疼痛自我效能量表)、定量感觉测试(压痛阈值、热痛阈值、条件性疼痛调节(时间累加)和运动诱发性疼痛(举重、功能性运动、重复性运动、自选任务)。主要测量方法:在每次任务前、中、后分别评估肩痛强度。t检验和方差分析通过易怒来检验每个运动任务的差异。结果在标准化举重任务中,易怒组(p=0.03)显著高于非易怒组(p=0.03),高度易怒组显著高于中度易怒组(p=0.03)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Rehabilitation
Clinical Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
117
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Rehabilitation covering the whole field of disability and rehabilitation, this peer-reviewed journal publishes research and discussion articles and acts as a forum for the international dissemination and exchange of information amongst the large number of professionals involved in rehabilitation. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信