Revascularization in Nonagenarians with Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia Can Be Effective.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Maria Chiara Rizzi, Gilles Soenens, Ornella Pancheri, Sebastiano Tasselli, Nathalie Moreels, Isabelle Van Herzeele, Stefano Bonvini
{"title":"Revascularization in Nonagenarians with Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia Can Be Effective.","authors":"Maria Chiara Rizzi, Gilles Soenens, Ornella Pancheri, Sebastiano Tasselli, Nathalie Moreels, Isabelle Van Herzeele, Stefano Bonvini","doi":"10.1007/s00270-025-04065-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The average age of patients with Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia (CLTI) who are being referred to vascular surgery units is increasing. This study aimed to evaluate clinical outcomes of revascularization (wound healing and cessation of rest pain) in nonagenarians with CLTI and the impact on their initial living status.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective, single centre study included patients aged 90 or more who presented with CLTI. Two groups were compared: \"treated\", who underwent revascularization (open, endovascular or hybrid), versus \"not treated\", who were treated conservatively. The latter included patients unfit for invasive treatment, with overriding active diseases, hip/knee ankylosis or refusing invasive treatment. Both groups were followed by dedicated wound care specialists. The primary outcomes were wound healing or cessation of rest pain and maintenance of initial living status after discharge. Secondary outcomes were overall mortality and major amputations at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months. Demographics, type of invasive treatment, access related complications and postoperative general complications were collected as well. Wound healing and mortality were assessed using cumulative outcome estimates according to Kaplan-Meier and comparisons using the log-rank test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between 1st January 2018 and 31st July 2023, 123 patients with 131 chronic limb-threatening ischemic limbs were included. The \"treated\" group included 101 limbs with Rutherford 4 (n = 8,7.9%), 5 (n = 78, 77.2%) and 6 (n = 15, 14.9%) Peripheral Arterial Disease (PAD),. The \"not treated\" group included 30 limbs with Rutherford 5 (n = 22, 73.3%) and 6 (n = 8, 26.7%) PAD. Treatment consisted of eight open, 86 endovascular and seven hybrid procedures. No primary amputations were conducted. At 1 year, 64.6% (31/48) of the wounds in the \"treated\" group healed, while non healed in the \"not treated\" group (p < .001). Eighty-nine (94%) of the treated patients lived at home, and 72/89 (81%) were able to return home after discharge. One-year mortality rates for treated and not treated patients were 31.7% and 63.3%, respectively (p < .001). Access related complications were noted in 6.9% of the nonagenarians and 33.7% had a general adverse event.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Revascularization in nonagenarians with CLTI can be effective despite the advanced age. Wound healing is feasible without compromising the initial patient living autonomy and maintaining a low risk of major amputation and an acceptable mortality rate.</p>","PeriodicalId":9591,"journal":{"name":"CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"976-983"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-025-04065-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The average age of patients with Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia (CLTI) who are being referred to vascular surgery units is increasing. This study aimed to evaluate clinical outcomes of revascularization (wound healing and cessation of rest pain) in nonagenarians with CLTI and the impact on their initial living status.

Methods: This retrospective, single centre study included patients aged 90 or more who presented with CLTI. Two groups were compared: "treated", who underwent revascularization (open, endovascular or hybrid), versus "not treated", who were treated conservatively. The latter included patients unfit for invasive treatment, with overriding active diseases, hip/knee ankylosis or refusing invasive treatment. Both groups were followed by dedicated wound care specialists. The primary outcomes were wound healing or cessation of rest pain and maintenance of initial living status after discharge. Secondary outcomes were overall mortality and major amputations at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months. Demographics, type of invasive treatment, access related complications and postoperative general complications were collected as well. Wound healing and mortality were assessed using cumulative outcome estimates according to Kaplan-Meier and comparisons using the log-rank test.

Results: Between 1st January 2018 and 31st July 2023, 123 patients with 131 chronic limb-threatening ischemic limbs were included. The "treated" group included 101 limbs with Rutherford 4 (n = 8,7.9%), 5 (n = 78, 77.2%) and 6 (n = 15, 14.9%) Peripheral Arterial Disease (PAD),. The "not treated" group included 30 limbs with Rutherford 5 (n = 22, 73.3%) and 6 (n = 8, 26.7%) PAD. Treatment consisted of eight open, 86 endovascular and seven hybrid procedures. No primary amputations were conducted. At 1 year, 64.6% (31/48) of the wounds in the "treated" group healed, while non healed in the "not treated" group (p < .001). Eighty-nine (94%) of the treated patients lived at home, and 72/89 (81%) were able to return home after discharge. One-year mortality rates for treated and not treated patients were 31.7% and 63.3%, respectively (p < .001). Access related complications were noted in 6.9% of the nonagenarians and 33.7% had a general adverse event.

Conclusions: Revascularization in nonagenarians with CLTI can be effective despite the advanced age. Wound healing is feasible without compromising the initial patient living autonomy and maintaining a low risk of major amputation and an acceptable mortality rate.

血管重建术对慢性肢体缺血的老年患者是有效的。
目的:慢性肢体威胁缺血(CLTI)患者转介到血管外科的平均年龄正在增加。本研究旨在评估老年CLTI患者血运重建(伤口愈合和静止疼痛停止)的临床结果及其对其初始生活状态的影响。方法:这项回顾性、单中心研究纳入了年龄在90岁及以上的CLTI患者。将两组进行比较:“治疗”组,接受血管重建术(开放、血管内或混合),与“未治疗”组,接受保守治疗。后者包括不适合侵入性治疗的患者,有严重的活动性疾病,髋关节/膝关节强直或拒绝侵入性治疗。两组患者均由专门的伤口护理专家进行随访。主要结局是伤口愈合或静止疼痛停止和出院后维持初始生活状态。次要结局是1、3、6和12个月时的总死亡率和主要截肢。统计数据、有创治疗类型、通路相关并发症及术后一般并发症。伤口愈合和死亡率采用Kaplan-Meier累积结果评估和log-rank检验比较。结果:2018年1月1日至2023年7月31日,纳入123例慢性肢体威胁缺血性肢体131例。“治疗”组包括101条患有Rutherford 4 (n = 8,7.9%)、5条(n = 78, 77.2%)和6条(n = 15, 14.9%)外周动脉疾病(PAD)的肢体。“未治疗”组包括卢瑟福5 (n = 22, 73.3%)和PAD 6 (n = 8, 26.7%)肢体30条。治疗包括8例开放手术、86例血管内手术和7例混合手术。未进行首次截肢。1年后,“治疗”组创面愈合率为64.6%(31/48),而“未治疗”组创面未愈合(p)。结论:老年CLTI患者的血运重建术虽年事已高,但仍然有效。伤口愈合是可行的,不影响患者最初的生活自主权,保持较低的主要截肢风险和可接受的死亡率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
13.80%
发文量
306
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology (CVIR) is the official journal of the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe, and is also the official organ of a number of additional distinguished national and international interventional radiological societies. CVIR publishes double blinded peer-reviewed original research work including clinical and laboratory investigations, technical notes, case reports, works in progress, and letters to the editor, as well as review articles, pictorial essays, editorials, and special invited submissions in the field of vascular and interventional radiology. Beside the communication of the latest research results in this field, it is also the aim of CVIR to support continuous medical education. Articles that are accepted for publication are done so with the understanding that they, or their substantive contents, have not been and will not be submitted to any other publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信