Short-term mortality after opioid initiation among opioid-naïve and non-naïve patients with dementia: a retrospective cohort study.

IF 7 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Yeon-Mi Hwang, Jennifer M Hah, Jennifer E Bramen, Jennifer J Hadlock, Tina Hernandez-Boussard
{"title":"Short-term mortality after opioid initiation among opioid-naïve and non-naïve patients with dementia: a retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Yeon-Mi Hwang, Jennifer M Hah, Jennifer E Bramen, Jennifer J Hadlock, Tina Hernandez-Boussard","doi":"10.1186/s12916-025-04172-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the ongoing opioid epidemic, the mortality risk of opioid initiation in patients with dementia or mild cognitive impairment (MCI) remains understudied despite their vulnerability. This study evaluates mortality risks associated with opioid exposure in patients diagnosed with dementia or MCI by comparing outcomes between the initiation and continuation groups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study using data from a Northern California academic healthcare system (Stanford Health Care Alliance; 2015/01/01-2024/07/31), including 27,757 patients aged 50-100 with dementia or MCI. Of these, 14,105 received opioids after diagnosis and were classified as initiation (opioid-naïve; n=9443) or continuation (non-naïve; n=4662) groups. Cox regression assessed 14-day mortality risk. Aalen's additive model examined time-varying impact up to 180 days. Potential causes of death were extracted from clinical notes using GPT-3.5-Turbo. We also analyzed an independent community healthcare system cohort (Providence Health & Service; n=208,306) from western US states (2015/01/01-2023/05/31) as a replication cohort.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the primary cohort, 4.1% (572/14,105) of patients died within 14 days of opioid exposure. The initiation group had a significantly higher 14-day mortality risk than the continuation group (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR), 2.00 (1.59-2.52); P<0.0001). The replication cohort had a 14-day mortality rate of 6.2% (7022/113,343) with a smaller difference between the initiation (n=77,168) and continuation (n=36,175) groups (aHR 1.22 (1.16-1.30); P<0.0001). In both cohorts, elevated risk stabilized after day 30. In the primary cohort, respiratory conditions (62% vs. 48%, P<0.1), particularly pneumonia (38% vs. 19%, P<0.05), were more prevalent among the initiation group who died early.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Starting opioids in patients with dementia or MCI is associated with elevated short-term mortality risks, with the initiation group having twice the 14-day mortality risk in academic settings and a smaller but significant increase in community healthcare systems. The first 30 days after initiation represent a critical risk window, likely due to a lack of tolerance to opioid adverse effects. These findings underscore the need for cautious initiation, tailored follow-up protocols accounting for healthcare setting characteristics, and close monitoring during the first month in this vulnerable population.</p>","PeriodicalId":9188,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medicine","volume":"23 1","pages":"340"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12147241/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-025-04172-1","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In the ongoing opioid epidemic, the mortality risk of opioid initiation in patients with dementia or mild cognitive impairment (MCI) remains understudied despite their vulnerability. This study evaluates mortality risks associated with opioid exposure in patients diagnosed with dementia or MCI by comparing outcomes between the initiation and continuation groups.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using data from a Northern California academic healthcare system (Stanford Health Care Alliance; 2015/01/01-2024/07/31), including 27,757 patients aged 50-100 with dementia or MCI. Of these, 14,105 received opioids after diagnosis and were classified as initiation (opioid-naïve; n=9443) or continuation (non-naïve; n=4662) groups. Cox regression assessed 14-day mortality risk. Aalen's additive model examined time-varying impact up to 180 days. Potential causes of death were extracted from clinical notes using GPT-3.5-Turbo. We also analyzed an independent community healthcare system cohort (Providence Health & Service; n=208,306) from western US states (2015/01/01-2023/05/31) as a replication cohort.

Results: In the primary cohort, 4.1% (572/14,105) of patients died within 14 days of opioid exposure. The initiation group had a significantly higher 14-day mortality risk than the continuation group (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR), 2.00 (1.59-2.52); P<0.0001). The replication cohort had a 14-day mortality rate of 6.2% (7022/113,343) with a smaller difference between the initiation (n=77,168) and continuation (n=36,175) groups (aHR 1.22 (1.16-1.30); P<0.0001). In both cohorts, elevated risk stabilized after day 30. In the primary cohort, respiratory conditions (62% vs. 48%, P<0.1), particularly pneumonia (38% vs. 19%, P<0.05), were more prevalent among the initiation group who died early.

Conclusions: Starting opioids in patients with dementia or MCI is associated with elevated short-term mortality risks, with the initiation group having twice the 14-day mortality risk in academic settings and a smaller but significant increase in community healthcare systems. The first 30 days after initiation represent a critical risk window, likely due to a lack of tolerance to opioid adverse effects. These findings underscore the need for cautious initiation, tailored follow-up protocols accounting for healthcare setting characteristics, and close monitoring during the first month in this vulnerable population.

opioid-naïve和non-naïve痴呆患者服用阿片类药物后的短期死亡率:一项回顾性队列研究。
背景:在持续的阿片类药物流行中,尽管患有痴呆症或轻度认知障碍(MCI)的患者具有易感性,但阿片类药物起始的死亡率风险仍未得到充分研究。本研究通过比较起始组和继续组的结果来评估诊断为痴呆或MCI的患者与阿片类药物暴露相关的死亡风险。方法:我们进行了一项回顾性队列研究,使用来自北加州学术医疗保健系统的数据(斯坦福医疗保健联盟;2015/01/01- 20124/07/31),包括27,757名年龄在50-100岁的痴呆症或轻度认知障碍患者。其中,14,105人在诊断后接受阿片类药物治疗,并被归类为起始(opioid-naïve;N =9443)或继续(non-naïve;n = 4662)组。Cox回归评估14天死亡风险。Aalen的加性模型研究了180天内随时间变化的影响。使用GPT-3.5-Turbo从临床记录中提取潜在死亡原因。我们还分析了一个独立的社区医疗保健系统队列(普罗维登斯健康与服务;n=208,306)来自美国西部各州(2015/01/01-2023/05/31)作为复制队列。结果:在主要队列中,4.1%(572/14,105)的患者在阿片类药物暴露后14天内死亡。起始组14天死亡风险显著高于继续组(校正风险比(aHR), 2.00 (1.59-2.52);结论:痴呆或MCI患者开始使用阿片类药物与短期死亡风险升高有关,在学术环境中,开始使用阿片类药物组的14天死亡风险是前者的两倍,在社区卫生保健系统中,阿片类药物组的14天死亡风险增加幅度较小但显著。开始治疗后的前30天是一个关键的风险窗口,可能是由于对阿片类药物不良反应缺乏耐受性。这些发现强调需要谨慎开始,根据医疗环境特点量身定制的随访方案,并在这一弱势群体的第一个月密切监测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Medicine
BMC Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
13.10
自引率
1.10%
发文量
435
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medicine is an open access, transparent peer-reviewed general medical journal. It is the flagship journal of the BMC series and publishes outstanding and influential research in various areas including clinical practice, translational medicine, medical and health advances, public health, global health, policy, and general topics of interest to the biomedical and sociomedical professional communities. In addition to research articles, the journal also publishes stimulating debates, reviews, unique forum articles, and concise tutorials. All articles published in BMC Medicine are included in various databases such as Biological Abstracts, BIOSIS, CAS, Citebase, Current contents, DOAJ, Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, Science Citation Index Expanded, OAIster, SCImago, Scopus, SOCOLAR, and Zetoc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信