Improving local authority financial support services for users with complex health needs: a mixed-method economic evaluation of Social Navigators in South Tyneside, UK.

IF 1.3 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Peter van der Graaf, Andrew McCarthy, Murali Krishnan Perumbakkam Subramanian, Bronia Arnott, Dilupa Samarakoon, Sarah Lee, Joanne Gray, Angela Bate
{"title":"Improving local authority financial support services for users with complex health needs: a mixed-method economic evaluation of Social Navigators in South Tyneside, UK.","authors":"Peter van der Graaf, Andrew McCarthy, Murali Krishnan Perumbakkam Subramanian, Bronia Arnott, Dilupa Samarakoon, Sarah Lee, Joanne Gray, Angela Bate","doi":"10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003290","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite social prescribing being promoted by the UK government for the last decade, the evidence supporting social prescribing remains weak and has mainly been confined to clinical contexts. Our study aimed to evaluate the impact of a Social Navigator (SN) service in South Tyneside on the health and well-being of users who experience financial hardship with complex health needs and limited access to mental health services.Using a mixed-methods design combining secondary analysis of service data (n=330), qualitative interviews with service users (n=15) conducted by peer researchers, and a social return On investment analysis that matched service data with health economic indicators from the UK Social Value Bank.Our findings demonstrate clear value for money with a £3 return for every £1 invested in the service, with a positive return confirmed in sensitivity analysis. SNs were able to improve the confidence of service users, with statistically significant changes across all eight confidence-related outcomes, and helped them to access other advice and financial services. This resulted in one-off financial gains (average £1237) and annual financial gains (average £1703) for service users. The interviews identified that relieving financial burden and stress improved the quality of life and mental well-being of users as a result of their involvement with the service.SN can break the cycle of multiple visits to crisis teams by building trusting relationships and providing emotional and practical support, while being responsive to the service users' needs and available when they have needs. They play a key intermediary role in integrated care systems with a unique focus on the wider determinants of health and financial hardship, advocating for service users without time limits and navigating the complexities of the system across local government. Greater integration of local support services could be achieved by mapping all available pathways for support.</p>","PeriodicalId":9052,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Quality","volume":"14 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12161336/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Quality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003290","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite social prescribing being promoted by the UK government for the last decade, the evidence supporting social prescribing remains weak and has mainly been confined to clinical contexts. Our study aimed to evaluate the impact of a Social Navigator (SN) service in South Tyneside on the health and well-being of users who experience financial hardship with complex health needs and limited access to mental health services.Using a mixed-methods design combining secondary analysis of service data (n=330), qualitative interviews with service users (n=15) conducted by peer researchers, and a social return On investment analysis that matched service data with health economic indicators from the UK Social Value Bank.Our findings demonstrate clear value for money with a £3 return for every £1 invested in the service, with a positive return confirmed in sensitivity analysis. SNs were able to improve the confidence of service users, with statistically significant changes across all eight confidence-related outcomes, and helped them to access other advice and financial services. This resulted in one-off financial gains (average £1237) and annual financial gains (average £1703) for service users. The interviews identified that relieving financial burden and stress improved the quality of life and mental well-being of users as a result of their involvement with the service.SN can break the cycle of multiple visits to crisis teams by building trusting relationships and providing emotional and practical support, while being responsive to the service users' needs and available when they have needs. They play a key intermediary role in integrated care systems with a unique focus on the wider determinants of health and financial hardship, advocating for service users without time limits and navigating the complexities of the system across local government. Greater integration of local support services could be achieved by mapping all available pathways for support.

改善地方当局对具有复杂健康需求的用户的财政支持服务:英国南泰恩赛德社会导航员的混合方法经济评价。
尽管英国政府在过去十年中一直在推广社会处方,但支持社会处方的证据仍然薄弱,而且主要局限于临床背景。本研究旨在评估南泰恩赛德的社会导航员(SN)服务对经历经济困难、复杂健康需求和获得精神健康服务有限的用户的健康和福祉的影响。采用混合方法设计,结合对服务数据的二次分析(n=330)、同行研究人员对服务用户进行的定性访谈(n=15),以及将服务数据与英国社会价值银行的健康经济指标相匹配的社会投资回报分析。我们的研究结果表明,在这项服务上每投入1英镑,就能获得3英镑的回报,并且在敏感性分析中得到了正回报。社交网络能够提高服务用户的信心,在所有八项与信心相关的结果中都有统计学上的显著变化,并帮助他们获得其他建议和金融服务。这为服务用户带来了一次性经济收益(平均1237英镑)和年度经济收益(平均1703英镑)。访谈表明,减轻经济负担和压力改善了用户参与服务的生活质量和精神健康。通过建立信任关系,提供情感和实际支持,SN可以打破多次访问危机团队的循环,同时响应服务用户的需求,并在他们有需要时提供帮助。他们在综合保健系统中发挥着关键的中介作用,其独特的重点是健康和经济困难的更广泛决定因素,倡导不受时间限制的服务使用者,并在地方政府间处理系统的复杂性。通过绘制所有可用的支助途径,可以实现地方支助服务的更大一体化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Open Quality
BMJ Open Quality Nursing-Leadership and Management
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
226
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信