Using an audiovisual feedback device improves cardiopulmonary resuscitation performance during day and night - a randomized controlled simulation study.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Melanie Preuss, Rainer Röhrig, Christian Hübel, Clara Vos, Jenny Unterkofler, Jörg Christian Brokmann, Klaus Willmes, Christopher Plata
{"title":"Using an audiovisual feedback device improves cardiopulmonary resuscitation performance during day and night - a randomized controlled simulation study.","authors":"Melanie Preuss, Rainer Röhrig, Christian Hübel, Clara Vos, Jenny Unterkofler, Jörg Christian Brokmann, Klaus Willmes, Christopher Plata","doi":"10.1186/s12873-025-01249-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Survival of in-hospital-cardiac-arrests is lower when they occur at night and at weekends than when they occur during the day. Despite numerous studies, there is little evidence regarding the cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality at night and the influence of a feedback device depending on time of day. The present study investigates the differences between chest compressions at night and during the day, with and without the use of a feedback device.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was approved by the local Ethics Committee and registered in the German Clinical Trials Register on 22nd of February 2022 (DRKS00027309) prior to inclusion of the first participant. 158 medical professionals were randomized into one of two groups: \"no feedback\" and \"feedback\"-group. In both groups, participants carried out three two-minute intervals of cardiopulmonary resuscitation on a manikin at day and at night. Members of the \"feedback\"-group received guidance by a feedback device. Primary endpoint was the mean compression depth at two time-intervals at the beginning (t<sub>1</sub> = 30-60 s) and the end (t<sub>2</sub> = 480-540 s) of the experience at night. Secondary endpoints included mean compression depth, adequate compression depth (%), compression rate and effective compressions (%).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At night, mean compression depth was significantly higher in the \"feedback\"-group at t<sub>1</sub> (47.7 ± 7.9 mm, 95% CI [45.6-49.8] vs 42.9 ± 11.0 mm, 95% CI [40.8-45.0]) and t<sub>2</sub> (46.2 ± 7.9 mm, 95% CI [44.0-48.4] vs 39.6 ± 11.6 mm, 95% CI [37.3-41.8]). There was no significant difference in mean compression depth between day and night in the \"no feedback\"-group (41.4 ± 10.8 mm, 95% CI [39.3-43.5] vs 42.2 ± 10.8 mm, 95% CI [40.1-44.3]) nor in the \"feedback-group\" (47.4 ± 7.6 mm, 95% CI [45.3-49.4] vs 47.4 ± 7.5 mm; 95% CI [45.4-49.5]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of a real-time audiovisual feedback significantly improved compression depth during the day and night in a manikin-based simulation study with medical professionals.</p>","PeriodicalId":9002,"journal":{"name":"BMC Emergency Medicine","volume":"25 1","pages":"95"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12145583/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-025-01249-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Survival of in-hospital-cardiac-arrests is lower when they occur at night and at weekends than when they occur during the day. Despite numerous studies, there is little evidence regarding the cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality at night and the influence of a feedback device depending on time of day. The present study investigates the differences between chest compressions at night and during the day, with and without the use of a feedback device.

Methods: The study was approved by the local Ethics Committee and registered in the German Clinical Trials Register on 22nd of February 2022 (DRKS00027309) prior to inclusion of the first participant. 158 medical professionals were randomized into one of two groups: "no feedback" and "feedback"-group. In both groups, participants carried out three two-minute intervals of cardiopulmonary resuscitation on a manikin at day and at night. Members of the "feedback"-group received guidance by a feedback device. Primary endpoint was the mean compression depth at two time-intervals at the beginning (t1 = 30-60 s) and the end (t2 = 480-540 s) of the experience at night. Secondary endpoints included mean compression depth, adequate compression depth (%), compression rate and effective compressions (%).

Results: At night, mean compression depth was significantly higher in the "feedback"-group at t1 (47.7 ± 7.9 mm, 95% CI [45.6-49.8] vs 42.9 ± 11.0 mm, 95% CI [40.8-45.0]) and t2 (46.2 ± 7.9 mm, 95% CI [44.0-48.4] vs 39.6 ± 11.6 mm, 95% CI [37.3-41.8]). There was no significant difference in mean compression depth between day and night in the "no feedback"-group (41.4 ± 10.8 mm, 95% CI [39.3-43.5] vs 42.2 ± 10.8 mm, 95% CI [40.1-44.3]) nor in the "feedback-group" (47.4 ± 7.6 mm, 95% CI [45.3-49.4] vs 47.4 ± 7.5 mm; 95% CI [45.4-49.5]).

Conclusion: The use of a real-time audiovisual feedback significantly improved compression depth during the day and night in a manikin-based simulation study with medical professionals.

一项随机对照模拟研究表明,使用视听反馈装置可提高心肺复苏在白天和夜间的表现。
背景:住院心脏骤停发生在夜间和周末的生存率低于发生在白天的生存率。尽管有大量的研究,但关于夜间心肺复苏质量和反馈装置对一天中不同时间的影响的证据很少。本研究调查了夜间和白天胸外按压的差异,有无使用反馈装置。方法:在纳入第一名受试者之前,该研究已获得当地伦理委员会的批准,并于2022年2月22日在德国临床试验登记处注册(DRKS00027309)。158名医疗专业人员被随机分为两组:“无反馈”组和“有反馈”组。在两组中,参与者在白天和晚上分别对人体模型进行三次两分钟间隔的心肺复苏。“反馈”组的成员接受反馈装置的指导。主要终点为夜间体验开始(t1 = 30-60 s)和结束(t2 = 480-540 s)两个时间间隔的平均压缩深度。次要终点包括平均压缩深度、适当压缩深度(%)、压缩率和有效压缩率(%)。结果:在夜间,“反馈”组在t1(47.7±7.9 mm, 95% CI [45.6-49.8] vs 42.9±11.0 mm, 95% CI[40.8-45.0])和t2(46.2±7.9 mm, 95% CI [44.0-48.4] vs 39.6±11.6 mm, 95% CI[37.3-41.8])的平均压迫深度明显更高。“无反馈”组(41.4±10.8 mm, 95% CI [39.3-43.5] vs 42.2±10.8 mm, 95% CI[40.1-44.3])和“反馈组”(47.4±7.6 mm, 95% CI [45.3-49.4] vs 47.4±7.5 mm)白天和夜间的平均压迫深度无显著差异;95% ci[45.4-49.5])。结论:在与医学专业人员进行的基于人体模型的模拟研究中,使用实时视听反馈可显著改善白天和夜间的压缩深度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Emergency Medicine
BMC Emergency Medicine Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
8.00%
发文量
178
审稿时长
29 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Emergency Medicine is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all urgent and emergency aspects of medicine, in both practice and basic research. In addition, the journal covers aspects of disaster medicine and medicine in special locations, such as conflict areas and military medicine, together with articles concerning healthcare services in the emergency departments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信