National survey on availability, use and clinical impact of point-of-care blood analysis systems in Swedish emergency departments.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Matthias Jörg, Tim Lundgren, Jens Wretborn, Daniel B Wilhelms
{"title":"National survey on availability, use and clinical impact of point-of-care blood analysis systems in Swedish emergency departments.","authors":"Matthias Jörg, Tim Lundgren, Jens Wretborn, Daniel B Wilhelms","doi":"10.1186/s12873-025-01251-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Expedited diagnostic results are important in time sensitive operations like the Emergency Department (ED). Point-of-care testing (POCT) is used for a broad range of blood tests reducing wait times and providing faster decisions on patient management compared to central laboratory analysis. If POCT is to substitute central laboratory analysis as part of the decision making process in the ED, cognizance on the distribution and availability of the required instruments, staff training and workflow integration is essential. The aim of this study was to determine the accessibility of POCT, with particular emphasis on blood gas analysis, in all Swedish EDs and to describe its incorporation into workflow.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was an exploratory survey study conducted in 2024 using a digital questionnaire focusing on POCT availability, perceived reliability, sampling, analysis and workflow integration. Descriptive data is reported as percentage, mean with standard deviation. Qualitative data in open-ended questions was analyzed in a descriptive manner and systematically summarized.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All Swedish EDs (n = 71) responded to our survey. All EDs utilized some kind of POCT with the most prevalent being blood gas, Hb, glucose and CRP. 75% of all EDs had at least one blood gas instrument on site. 44% had guidelines to define indication and usage, 67% replaced certain central laboratory analyses in favor of POCT. ED staff assessed the reliability of results of POCT blood gas analysis as 8 on a 1-10 likert scale (SD 1). All EDs provided staff training on sampling and analysis, but only 30% of EDs had repeated training sessions to avoid misoperation and preanalytical errors. In 32% of reporting EDs, POCT blood gas analysis was performed on more than 30% of patients, mainly triggered by standard operating procedures.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>All Swedish EDs utilized basic POCT to accelerate patient flow. The majority of Swedish EDs have access to POCT blood gas analysis, the replacement of central laboratory analyses was common. Perceived reliability of POCT blood gas analysis results was considered high, despite the fact that staff training varied substantially. The overall utilization of other POCT remains low - that despite good evidence for cost-effectiveness, reliability and shortened length of stay.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Clinical trial number: Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":9002,"journal":{"name":"BMC Emergency Medicine","volume":"25 1","pages":"93"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12145587/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-025-01251-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Expedited diagnostic results are important in time sensitive operations like the Emergency Department (ED). Point-of-care testing (POCT) is used for a broad range of blood tests reducing wait times and providing faster decisions on patient management compared to central laboratory analysis. If POCT is to substitute central laboratory analysis as part of the decision making process in the ED, cognizance on the distribution and availability of the required instruments, staff training and workflow integration is essential. The aim of this study was to determine the accessibility of POCT, with particular emphasis on blood gas analysis, in all Swedish EDs and to describe its incorporation into workflow.

Methods: This was an exploratory survey study conducted in 2024 using a digital questionnaire focusing on POCT availability, perceived reliability, sampling, analysis and workflow integration. Descriptive data is reported as percentage, mean with standard deviation. Qualitative data in open-ended questions was analyzed in a descriptive manner and systematically summarized.

Results: All Swedish EDs (n = 71) responded to our survey. All EDs utilized some kind of POCT with the most prevalent being blood gas, Hb, glucose and CRP. 75% of all EDs had at least one blood gas instrument on site. 44% had guidelines to define indication and usage, 67% replaced certain central laboratory analyses in favor of POCT. ED staff assessed the reliability of results of POCT blood gas analysis as 8 on a 1-10 likert scale (SD 1). All EDs provided staff training on sampling and analysis, but only 30% of EDs had repeated training sessions to avoid misoperation and preanalytical errors. In 32% of reporting EDs, POCT blood gas analysis was performed on more than 30% of patients, mainly triggered by standard operating procedures.

Conclusion: All Swedish EDs utilized basic POCT to accelerate patient flow. The majority of Swedish EDs have access to POCT blood gas analysis, the replacement of central laboratory analyses was common. Perceived reliability of POCT blood gas analysis results was considered high, despite the fact that staff training varied substantially. The overall utilization of other POCT remains low - that despite good evidence for cost-effectiveness, reliability and shortened length of stay.

Trial registration: Clinical trial number: Not applicable.

瑞典急诊科即时血液分析系统的可得性、使用和临床影响的全国调查。
背景:在急诊科(ED)等时间敏感的手术中,快速诊断结果非常重要。与中心实验室分析相比,即时检测(POCT)用于广泛的血液检测,减少了等待时间,并提供了更快的患者管理决策。如果POCT要取代中心实验室分析作为ED决策过程的一部分,那么对所需仪器的分配和可用性、员工培训和工作流程整合的认识是必不可少的。本研究的目的是确定POCT的可及性,特别强调血气分析,在所有瑞典急诊科,并描述其纳入工作流程。方法:本研究是一项探索性调查研究,采用数字问卷,重点关注POCT可用性、感知可靠性、抽样、分析和工作流集成。描述性数据以百分比、平均值和标准差报告。对开放式问题中的定性数据进行描述性分析,并进行系统总结。结果:所有瑞典ed (n = 71)对我们的调查做出了回应。所有急诊科都使用了某种形式的POCT,最常见的是血气、Hb、葡萄糖和CRP。75%的急诊室现场至少有一台血气仪。44%的人有明确适应症和用法的指南,67%的人取代了某些中心实验室分析,支持POCT。ED工作人员将POCT血气分析结果的可靠性评定为8分(李克特评分为1-10)。所有诊诊科都对员工进行了采样和分析培训,但只有30%的诊诊科进行了重复培训,以避免误操作和分析前错误。在32%的急诊科报告中,超过30%的患者进行了POCT血气分析,主要是由标准操作程序触发的。结论:所有瑞典急诊科都采用了基本POCT,加快了病人的流动。大多数瑞典急诊科都可以使用POCT血气分析,取代中央实验室分析是很常见的。POCT血气分析结果的感知可靠性被认为是高的,尽管事实上工作人员的培训差异很大。其他POCT的总体利用率仍然很低——尽管有充分的证据表明成本效益、可靠性和住院时间缩短。试验注册:临床试验号:不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Emergency Medicine
BMC Emergency Medicine Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
8.00%
发文量
178
审稿时长
29 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Emergency Medicine is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all urgent and emergency aspects of medicine, in both practice and basic research. In addition, the journal covers aspects of disaster medicine and medicine in special locations, such as conflict areas and military medicine, together with articles concerning healthcare services in the emergency departments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信