What happens to conservatively managed chronic subdural haematoma.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Jack Read, Ellie Edlmann
{"title":"What happens to conservatively managed chronic subdural haematoma.","authors":"Jack Read, Ellie Edlmann","doi":"10.1007/s00701-025-06577-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic subdural haematoma (CSDH) is a common neurosurgical problem, increasingly prevalent due to an ageing population. Conservative management is an option for asymptomatic or mild cases, though data on outcomes is limited.</p><p><strong>Aim/objective: </strong>This study aims to address critical gaps in understanding around conservatively managedCSDH and whether there are features that can predict progression and the longer-term prognosis of these patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was performed at a major trauma centre in the UK. All patients with chronic subdural haematoma referred from March 2019 to March 2021 were included and grouped into surgical or conservative management. Demographic, outcome, and radiological data were collected from patient records and compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 289 patients, 90 had surgery and 199 were managed conservatively. Conservative patients were older (84 vs 77 years, p < 0.0001), had more comorbidities (4 vs 2, p < 0.0001), higher frailty (CFS > 6: 45% vs 10%, p < 0.0001), and greater anti-thrombotic use (57% vs 42%, p = 0.0175). Mortality was significantly higher in the conservative group at all time points including one month (16% vs 2%, p < 0.0001), one year (42% vs 12%, p < 0.0001) and two years (55% vs 21%, P < 0.0001). Surgical patients had significantly greater midline shift (10 mm vs 2.6 mm, p < 0.0001), and haematoma depth (24 mm vs 11 mm, p < 0.0001). Only 3% of conservative patients crossed over to surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study highlights the high mortality rate in conservatively managed CSDH, with frailty as a key indicator for early death. The low crossover to surgery questions the necessity of radiological monitoring in conservatively managed CSDH.</p>","PeriodicalId":7370,"journal":{"name":"Acta Neurochirurgica","volume":"167 1","pages":"164"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12145291/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Neurochirurgica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-025-06577-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Chronic subdural haematoma (CSDH) is a common neurosurgical problem, increasingly prevalent due to an ageing population. Conservative management is an option for asymptomatic or mild cases, though data on outcomes is limited.

Aim/objective: This study aims to address critical gaps in understanding around conservatively managedCSDH and whether there are features that can predict progression and the longer-term prognosis of these patients.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed at a major trauma centre in the UK. All patients with chronic subdural haematoma referred from March 2019 to March 2021 were included and grouped into surgical or conservative management. Demographic, outcome, and radiological data were collected from patient records and compared.

Results: Of 289 patients, 90 had surgery and 199 were managed conservatively. Conservative patients were older (84 vs 77 years, p < 0.0001), had more comorbidities (4 vs 2, p < 0.0001), higher frailty (CFS > 6: 45% vs 10%, p < 0.0001), and greater anti-thrombotic use (57% vs 42%, p = 0.0175). Mortality was significantly higher in the conservative group at all time points including one month (16% vs 2%, p < 0.0001), one year (42% vs 12%, p < 0.0001) and two years (55% vs 21%, P < 0.0001). Surgical patients had significantly greater midline shift (10 mm vs 2.6 mm, p < 0.0001), and haematoma depth (24 mm vs 11 mm, p < 0.0001). Only 3% of conservative patients crossed over to surgery.

Conclusion: Our study highlights the high mortality rate in conservatively managed CSDH, with frailty as a key indicator for early death. The low crossover to surgery questions the necessity of radiological monitoring in conservatively managed CSDH.

保守治疗慢性硬膜下血肿会发生什么?
背景:慢性硬膜下血肿(CSDH)是一种常见的神经外科问题,由于人口老龄化而日益普遍。对于无症状或轻度病例,保守治疗是一种选择,尽管有关结果的数据有限。目的/目的:本研究旨在解决对保守治疗csdh的理解的关键空白,以及是否存在可以预测这些患者进展和长期预后的特征。方法:回顾性队列研究在英国主要创伤中心进行。纳入2019年3月至2021年3月期间的所有慢性硬膜下血肿患者,并将其分为手术或保守治疗两组。从患者记录中收集人口统计学、预后和放射学数据并进行比较。结果:289例患者中,手术治疗90例,保守治疗199例。结论:我们的研究强调了保守治疗的CSDH的高死亡率,虚弱是早期死亡的关键指标。低交叉手术质疑放射监测的必要性在保守管理的CSDH。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Neurochirurgica
Acta Neurochirurgica 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
342
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The journal "Acta Neurochirurgica" publishes only original papers useful both to research and clinical work. Papers should deal with clinical neurosurgery - diagnosis and diagnostic techniques, operative surgery and results, postoperative treatment - or with research work in neuroscience if the underlying questions or the results are of neurosurgical interest. Reports on congresses are given in brief accounts. As official organ of the European Association of Neurosurgical Societies the journal publishes all announcements of the E.A.N.S. and reports on the activities of its member societies. Only contributions written in English will be accepted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信