Evaluation of sonication for the detection of periprosthetic joint infection in hip revision arthroplasty: a retrospective observational single-center study of 288 episodes.

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Bernhardt Kickinger, Tor Monsen, Emma Karis, Micael Widerström, Petter Sundin, Kjell G Nilsson, Volker Otten, Sead Crnalic
{"title":"Evaluation of sonication for the detection of periprosthetic joint infection in hip revision arthroplasty: a retrospective observational single-center study of 288 episodes.","authors":"Bernhardt Kickinger, Tor Monsen, Emma Karis, Micael Widerström, Petter Sundin, Kjell G Nilsson, Volker Otten, Sead Crnalic","doi":"10.2340/17453674.2025.43679","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong> Sonication fluid cultures have been proposed as a complementary diagnostic method to intraoperative tissue culture sampling for the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). We evaluated whether sonication provides additional clinically relevant information in the diagnosis of PJI in hip revision.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> Episodes of hip revision performed between January 2007 and December 2016 were assigned retrospectively to the European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS) definition of periprosthetic joint infection: infection unlikely, infection likely, and infection confirmed. The inclusion criteria were a minimum of 2 perioperative tissue cultures collected at the index procedure and sonication performed on a removed implant. The results of the tissue cultures were compared with the results of the implant sonication fluid cultures (SFCs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> 288 hip revision episodes in 250 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were analyzed. The \"infection unlikely\" group included 203 episodes (178 patients), the \"infection likely\" group included 5 episodes (5 patients), and the \"infection confirmed\" group included 80 episodes (67 patients). SFC delivered additional clinical information in 15/288: 6 of 203 episodes in the \"infection unlikely\" group, 2 of 5 episodes in the \"infection likely\" group, and 7 of 80 in the \"infection confirmed\" group. Coagulase-negative staphylococci and Staphylococcus aureus were the dominant bacterial species in both the SFC and tissue cultures.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> In addition to tissue cultures, sonication fluid cultures optimized the microbiological yield in 15 out of 288 hip revision episodes.</p>","PeriodicalId":6916,"journal":{"name":"Acta Orthopaedica","volume":"96 ","pages":"429-436"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Orthopaedica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2025.43679","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose:  Sonication fluid cultures have been proposed as a complementary diagnostic method to intraoperative tissue culture sampling for the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). We evaluated whether sonication provides additional clinically relevant information in the diagnosis of PJI in hip revision.

Methods:  Episodes of hip revision performed between January 2007 and December 2016 were assigned retrospectively to the European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS) definition of periprosthetic joint infection: infection unlikely, infection likely, and infection confirmed. The inclusion criteria were a minimum of 2 perioperative tissue cultures collected at the index procedure and sonication performed on a removed implant. The results of the tissue cultures were compared with the results of the implant sonication fluid cultures (SFCs).

Results:  288 hip revision episodes in 250 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were analyzed. The "infection unlikely" group included 203 episodes (178 patients), the "infection likely" group included 5 episodes (5 patients), and the "infection confirmed" group included 80 episodes (67 patients). SFC delivered additional clinical information in 15/288: 6 of 203 episodes in the "infection unlikely" group, 2 of 5 episodes in the "infection likely" group, and 7 of 80 in the "infection confirmed" group. Coagulase-negative staphylococci and Staphylococcus aureus were the dominant bacterial species in both the SFC and tissue cultures.

Conclusion:  In addition to tissue cultures, sonication fluid cultures optimized the microbiological yield in 15 out of 288 hip revision episodes.

超声检测髋关节翻修置换术中假体周围关节感染的评价:288例回顾性观察性单中心研究。
背景与目的:超声液培养已被提出作为术中组织培养取样诊断假体周围关节感染(PJI)的补充诊断方法。我们评估超声是否为髋关节翻修中PJI的诊断提供了额外的临床相关信息。方法:2007年1月至2016年12月期间进行的髋关节翻修事件回顾性分配到欧洲骨和关节感染协会(EBJIS)对假体周围关节感染的定义:不可能感染,可能感染和确认感染。纳入标准是在索引程序中收集至少2个围手术期组织培养物,并对移除的植入物进行超声检查。将组织培养结果与植体超声液体培养(sfc)结果进行比较。结果:250例患者288次髋关节翻修符合纳入标准并进行分析。“不可能感染”组203次(178例),“可能感染”组5次(5例),“确诊感染”组80次(67例)。SFC在15/288中提供了额外的临床信息:203例中有6例为“不可能感染”组,5例中有2例为“可能感染”组,80例中有7例为“确诊感染”组。凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌和金黄色葡萄球菌是SFC和组织培养的优势菌种。结论:除组织培养外,超声液体培养在288例髋关节翻修中有15例优化了微生物产量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Orthopaedica
Acta Orthopaedica 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
8.10%
发文量
105
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Orthopaedica (previously Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica) presents original articles of basic research interest, as well as clinical studies in the field of orthopedics and related sub disciplines. Ever since the journal was founded in 1930, by a group of Scandinavian orthopedic surgeons, the journal has been published for an international audience. Acta Orthopaedica is owned by the Nordic Orthopaedic Federation and is the official publication of this federation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信