Dynamic Appraisal of Situational Aggression Score at Emergency Department Triage Is Associated With Behavioral Intervention: A Cross-Sectional Study.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Amy D Costigan, Martin A Reznek, Christopher Slocum, Maureen M Canellas, Alexandra M Sanseverino, Vincent Kan, Janell Forget, Laurel C O'Connor
{"title":"Dynamic Appraisal of Situational Aggression Score at Emergency Department Triage Is Associated With Behavioral Intervention: A Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Amy D Costigan, Martin A Reznek, Christopher Slocum, Maureen M Canellas, Alexandra M Sanseverino, Vincent Kan, Janell Forget, Laurel C O'Connor","doi":"10.1111/acem.70082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Incidents of aggression and hostility towards staff in emergency departments (EDs) have escalated in frequency and severity, posing a serious threat to the well-being of patients and healthcare providers. Research on predictive tools for identifying individuals at risk of violent behavior in the ED remains scarce. The objective of this study was to assess the association between the Dynamic Appraisal of Situational Aggression (DASA) score assigned at triage and physical restraint or medications administered for safety during an ED encounter.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From January 11, 2023 to December 31, 2023, patients ≥ age 18 were assigned a DASA score during triage at five EDs. Subjects' triage DASA scores, demographic characteristics, and clinical outcomes were abstracted from the electronic health record. Subjects were risk-stratified into validated DASA risk categories for aggression (low, moderate, high, or imminent). Outcomes were measured by documented physical restraint or the administration of injected antipsychotic medication with or without a benzodiazepine. Modified Poisson regressions were used to calculate the crude and adjusted prevalence ratios (PRs) of any intervention (physical restraints and medication administration) by DASA score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>159,154 qualifying ED encounters were identified (mean age 51.5, 53.5% female). Increasing DASA score was associated with increasing PR of any behavioral intervention: physical restraint and/or safety medication administration. An imminent-risk DASA score was associated with an adjusted PR of 4.71 (CI 3.65-6.06, p < 0.001) for any intervention, 3.63 (CI 3.25-4.05, p < 0.001) for physical restraint, and 5.26 for any medication administration (CI 4.08-6.78, p < 0.001) compared to patients with a DASA score of 0.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Elevated DASA scores at ED triage were associated with an increased risk of patient restraint and safety medication administration during the ED encounter. Future research should assess how proactive interventions based on DASA scores influence violence risk and investigate the predictive value of consecutive DASA evaluations throughout ED encounters.</p>","PeriodicalId":7105,"journal":{"name":"Academic Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.70082","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Incidents of aggression and hostility towards staff in emergency departments (EDs) have escalated in frequency and severity, posing a serious threat to the well-being of patients and healthcare providers. Research on predictive tools for identifying individuals at risk of violent behavior in the ED remains scarce. The objective of this study was to assess the association between the Dynamic Appraisal of Situational Aggression (DASA) score assigned at triage and physical restraint or medications administered for safety during an ED encounter.

Methods: From January 11, 2023 to December 31, 2023, patients ≥ age 18 were assigned a DASA score during triage at five EDs. Subjects' triage DASA scores, demographic characteristics, and clinical outcomes were abstracted from the electronic health record. Subjects were risk-stratified into validated DASA risk categories for aggression (low, moderate, high, or imminent). Outcomes were measured by documented physical restraint or the administration of injected antipsychotic medication with or without a benzodiazepine. Modified Poisson regressions were used to calculate the crude and adjusted prevalence ratios (PRs) of any intervention (physical restraints and medication administration) by DASA score.

Results: 159,154 qualifying ED encounters were identified (mean age 51.5, 53.5% female). Increasing DASA score was associated with increasing PR of any behavioral intervention: physical restraint and/or safety medication administration. An imminent-risk DASA score was associated with an adjusted PR of 4.71 (CI 3.65-6.06, p < 0.001) for any intervention, 3.63 (CI 3.25-4.05, p < 0.001) for physical restraint, and 5.26 for any medication administration (CI 4.08-6.78, p < 0.001) compared to patients with a DASA score of 0.

Conclusions: Elevated DASA scores at ED triage were associated with an increased risk of patient restraint and safety medication administration during the ED encounter. Future research should assess how proactive interventions based on DASA scores influence violence risk and investigate the predictive value of consecutive DASA evaluations throughout ED encounters.

急诊科分诊时情境攻击得分动态评价与行为干预:一项横断面研究。
目的:针对急诊科(EDs)工作人员的攻击和敌意事件在频率和严重程度上都有所升级,对患者和医疗保健提供者的福祉构成严重威胁。在急诊科中,用于识别有暴力行为风险的个体的预测工具的研究仍然很少。本研究的目的是评估分诊时情境攻击动态评估(DASA)评分与ED遭遇时身体约束或安全用药之间的关系。方法:2023年1月11日至2023年12月31日,在5个急诊科进行分诊时,对年龄≥18岁的患者进行DASA评分。受试者的分类DASA评分、人口统计学特征和临床结果从电子健康记录中提取。研究对象被划分为DASA攻击风险类别(低、中、高或迫在眉睫)。结果通过记录的身体约束或注射抗精神病药物(含或不含苯二氮卓类药物)来测量。采用修正泊松回归,通过DASA评分计算任意干预措施(身体约束和药物管理)的粗患病率和调整患病率(pr)。结果:159,154例符合条件的急诊就诊(平均年龄51.5岁,53.5%为女性)。DASA评分的增加与任何行为干预(身体约束和/或安全药物管理)的PR增加有关。紧急风险DASA评分与调整后的PR为4.71 (CI 3.65-6.06, p)相关。结论:ED分诊时DASA评分升高与患者约束和ED安全用药风险增加相关。未来的研究应该评估基于DASA评分的主动干预如何影响暴力风险,并调查在ED遭遇过程中连续DASA评估的预测价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Academic Emergency Medicine
Academic Emergency Medicine 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
6.80%
发文量
207
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Academic Emergency Medicine (AEM) is the official monthly publication of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine (SAEM) and publishes information relevant to the practice, educational advancements, and investigation of emergency medicine. It is the second-largest peer-reviewed scientific journal in the specialty of emergency medicine. The goal of AEM is to advance the science, education, and clinical practice of emergency medicine, to serve as a voice for the academic emergency medicine community, and to promote SAEM''s goals and objectives. Members and non-members worldwide depend on this journal for translational medicine relevant to emergency medicine, as well as for clinical news, case studies and more. Each issue contains information relevant to the research, educational advancements, and practice in emergency medicine. Subject matter is diverse, including preclinical studies, clinical topics, health policy, and educational methods. The research of SAEM members contributes significantly to the scientific content and development of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信