Ian Moreira Souza, Victoria Bartolome, Rodrigo Delmonte Gessulli, Marcelo Guerreiro, Thiago de Oliveira Machado, Helio Secco, Pablo Rodrigues Gonçalves
{"title":"Mitigating Road Barrier Effects for Small Mammals: Evidence From Wildlife Passages in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest","authors":"Ian Moreira Souza, Victoria Bartolome, Rodrigo Delmonte Gessulli, Marcelo Guerreiro, Thiago de Oliveira Machado, Helio Secco, Pablo Rodrigues Gonçalves","doi":"10.1111/aec.70086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Roads significantly impact wildlife through collisions and habitat fragmentation. Wildlife crossing structures aim to mitigate these impacts, but their effectiveness for Neotropical small mammals is largely unknown. During 12 months, we monitored small mammal movements near overpasses, underpasses, and areas without structures (controls) in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, using capture-mark-recapture. We quantified highway crossings, structure use without crossing, and structure avoidance. Eight small mammal species were recorded, among which were four forest specialists. The marsupials <i>Didelphis aurita</i> and <i>Marmosa paraguayana</i> used overpasses, while the water rat <i>Nectomys squamipes</i> and the four-eyed opossum <i>Philander quica</i> used underpasses. However, only 5%–7% of marked individuals of the latter two species crossed the highway. The remaining four species (<i>Akodon cursor</i>, <i>Metachirus myosurus</i>, <i>Monodelphis cf. iheringi</i>, and <i>Mus musculus</i>) did not use the structures and were uncommon in roadside habitats. The results suggest that locally abundant forest small mammals avoiding roads can use crossing structures, potentially improving population connectivity compared to areas without them. However, rare forest specialists that did not use the passages may require more substantial interventions to enhance their connectivity. This research provides evidence for potential benefits of crossing structures for Neotropical small mammals while highlighting the need for tailored solutions for different species.</p>","PeriodicalId":8663,"journal":{"name":"Austral Ecology","volume":"50 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/aec.70086","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Austral Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aec.70086","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Roads significantly impact wildlife through collisions and habitat fragmentation. Wildlife crossing structures aim to mitigate these impacts, but their effectiveness for Neotropical small mammals is largely unknown. During 12 months, we monitored small mammal movements near overpasses, underpasses, and areas without structures (controls) in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, using capture-mark-recapture. We quantified highway crossings, structure use without crossing, and structure avoidance. Eight small mammal species were recorded, among which were four forest specialists. The marsupials Didelphis aurita and Marmosa paraguayana used overpasses, while the water rat Nectomys squamipes and the four-eyed opossum Philander quica used underpasses. However, only 5%–7% of marked individuals of the latter two species crossed the highway. The remaining four species (Akodon cursor, Metachirus myosurus, Monodelphis cf. iheringi, and Mus musculus) did not use the structures and were uncommon in roadside habitats. The results suggest that locally abundant forest small mammals avoiding roads can use crossing structures, potentially improving population connectivity compared to areas without them. However, rare forest specialists that did not use the passages may require more substantial interventions to enhance their connectivity. This research provides evidence for potential benefits of crossing structures for Neotropical small mammals while highlighting the need for tailored solutions for different species.
期刊介绍:
Austral Ecology is the premier journal for basic and applied ecology in the Southern Hemisphere. As the official Journal of The Ecological Society of Australia (ESA), Austral Ecology addresses the commonality between ecosystems in Australia and many parts of southern Africa, South America, New Zealand and Oceania. For example many species in the unique biotas of these regions share common Gondwana ancestors. ESA''s aim is to publish innovative research to encourage the sharing of information and experiences that enrich the understanding of the ecology of the Southern Hemisphere.
Austral Ecology involves an editorial board with representatives from Australia, South Africa, New Zealand, Brazil and Argentina. These representatives provide expert opinions, access to qualified reviewers and act as a focus for attracting a wide range of contributions from countries across the region.
Austral Ecology publishes original papers describing experimental, observational or theoretical studies on terrestrial, marine or freshwater systems, which are considered without taxonomic bias. Special thematic issues are published regularly, including symposia on the ecology of estuaries and soft sediment habitats, freshwater systems and coral reef fish.