{"title":"In Whose Calculation? The Conflicts, Compromises, and Conversions of Corporate-Initiated Renewable Electricity Markets","authors":"Ker-hsuan Chien","doi":"10.1111/anti.70027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper investigates how corporate-led renewable electricity (RE) markets, shaped by voluntary initiatives and calculative devices, restructure energy governance. Using Taiwan's RE market as a case study and drawing on marketisation theory, it reveals how multinational corporations, in collaboration with state actors, embed power asymmetries into climate governance. These asymmetries marginalise smaller firms and local stakeholders, reinforcing unequal access to RE. The findings challenge the state–market dichotomy, showing how both actors co-produce market rules through decentralised, yet uneven, governance. For scholars of environmental governance and energy policy, the paper offers a critical lens to assess how market instruments function not only as tools of coordination but also as mechanisms of exclusion. It argues for policy frameworks that explicitly address these asymmetries, and for practical interventions that democratise access to RE markets.</p>","PeriodicalId":8241,"journal":{"name":"Antipode","volume":"57 4","pages":"1426-1447"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antipode","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/anti.70027","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This paper investigates how corporate-led renewable electricity (RE) markets, shaped by voluntary initiatives and calculative devices, restructure energy governance. Using Taiwan's RE market as a case study and drawing on marketisation theory, it reveals how multinational corporations, in collaboration with state actors, embed power asymmetries into climate governance. These asymmetries marginalise smaller firms and local stakeholders, reinforcing unequal access to RE. The findings challenge the state–market dichotomy, showing how both actors co-produce market rules through decentralised, yet uneven, governance. For scholars of environmental governance and energy policy, the paper offers a critical lens to assess how market instruments function not only as tools of coordination but also as mechanisms of exclusion. It argues for policy frameworks that explicitly address these asymmetries, and for practical interventions that democratise access to RE markets.
期刊介绍:
Antipode has published dissenting scholarship that explores and utilizes key geographical ideas like space, scale, place, borders and landscape. It aims to challenge dominant and orthodox views of the world through debate, scholarship and politically-committed research, creating new spaces and envisioning new futures. Antipode welcomes the infusion of new ideas and the shaking up of old positions, without being committed to just one view of radical analysis or politics.