In Whose Calculation? The Conflicts, Compromises, and Conversions of Corporate-Initiated Renewable Electricity Markets

IF 3.6 1区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Antipode Pub Date : 2025-05-01 DOI:10.1111/anti.70027
Ker-hsuan Chien
{"title":"In Whose Calculation? The Conflicts, Compromises, and Conversions of Corporate-Initiated Renewable Electricity Markets","authors":"Ker-hsuan Chien","doi":"10.1111/anti.70027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper investigates how corporate-led renewable electricity (RE) markets, shaped by voluntary initiatives and calculative devices, restructure energy governance. Using Taiwan's RE market as a case study and drawing on marketisation theory, it reveals how multinational corporations, in collaboration with state actors, embed power asymmetries into climate governance. These asymmetries marginalise smaller firms and local stakeholders, reinforcing unequal access to RE. The findings challenge the state–market dichotomy, showing how both actors co-produce market rules through decentralised, yet uneven, governance. For scholars of environmental governance and energy policy, the paper offers a critical lens to assess how market instruments function not only as tools of coordination but also as mechanisms of exclusion. It argues for policy frameworks that explicitly address these asymmetries, and for practical interventions that democratise access to RE markets.</p>","PeriodicalId":8241,"journal":{"name":"Antipode","volume":"57 4","pages":"1426-1447"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antipode","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/anti.70027","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper investigates how corporate-led renewable electricity (RE) markets, shaped by voluntary initiatives and calculative devices, restructure energy governance. Using Taiwan's RE market as a case study and drawing on marketisation theory, it reveals how multinational corporations, in collaboration with state actors, embed power asymmetries into climate governance. These asymmetries marginalise smaller firms and local stakeholders, reinforcing unequal access to RE. The findings challenge the state–market dichotomy, showing how both actors co-produce market rules through decentralised, yet uneven, governance. For scholars of environmental governance and energy policy, the paper offers a critical lens to assess how market instruments function not only as tools of coordination but also as mechanisms of exclusion. It argues for policy frameworks that explicitly address these asymmetries, and for practical interventions that democratise access to RE markets.

谁的计算?企业发起的可再生电力市场的冲突、妥协与转换
本文研究了企业主导的可再生电力(RE)市场,在自愿倡议和计算设备的影响下,如何重构能源治理。本文以台湾可再生能源市场为例,运用市场化理论,揭示了跨国公司如何与国家行为体合作,将权力不对称嵌入气候治理中。这些不对称使小公司和地方利益相关者边缘化,加剧了对可再生能源的不平等获取。研究结果挑战了国家-市场二分法,展示了两个参与者如何通过分散但不平衡的治理共同制定市场规则。对于研究环境治理和能源政策的学者来说,本文提供了一个关键的视角来评估市场工具如何不仅作为协调工具,而且作为排斥机制发挥作用。它主张制定明确解决这些不对称问题的政策框架,并采取实际干预措施,使可再生能源市场的准入民主化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Antipode
Antipode GEOGRAPHY-
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
10.00%
发文量
111
期刊介绍: Antipode has published dissenting scholarship that explores and utilizes key geographical ideas like space, scale, place, borders and landscape. It aims to challenge dominant and orthodox views of the world through debate, scholarship and politically-committed research, creating new spaces and envisioning new futures. Antipode welcomes the infusion of new ideas and the shaking up of old positions, without being committed to just one view of radical analysis or politics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信