Water Interaction Type Affects Environmental DNA Shedding Rates of Terrestrial Mammal eDNA Into Surface Water Bodies

Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Gabriele Sauseng, Tamara Schenekar
{"title":"Water Interaction Type Affects Environmental DNA Shedding Rates of Terrestrial Mammal eDNA Into Surface Water Bodies","authors":"Gabriele Sauseng,&nbsp;Tamara Schenekar","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The analysis of environmental DNA (eDNA) has become a non-invasive, cost-efficient, and universal biomonitoring tool, widely applied across the globe. Most eDNA research focuses on aquatic organisms in freshwater and marine environments. eDNA shedding rates are key to interpreting eDNA-based results, such as for abundance estimations or detection probabilities. Shedding rates have been estimated for several species and life stages; however, virtually all of them are aquatic. As eDNA-based biomonitoring expands to terrestrial systems, waterborne eDNA from freshwater is increasingly used to assess species presence of terrestrial mammals. When interacting with the water, terrestrial mammals deposit their DNA into the water body, with the amount deposited presumably heavily depending on the interaction type. Here we quantify eDNA shedding rates from domestic dogs during various interactions with water bodies, including “passing by”, “drinking”, “crossing through”, “standing still” and “defecating.” “Crossing through” and “defecating” had the highest DNA shedding rates (both approx. 4 × 10<sup>7</sup> pg/h/ind). All direct water interactions led to eDNA shedding rates several orders of magnitude higher than those of the indirect interaction (“passing by”), resulting in higher eDNA concentrations and, consequently, higher eDNA detection probabilities. This has important implications for interpretations of eDNA-based data from such water bodies. We also highlight the high variability of eDNA concentrations across experimental replicates, which needs to be accounted for when designing eDNA sampling schemes.</p>","PeriodicalId":52828,"journal":{"name":"Environmental DNA","volume":"7 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edn3.70120","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental DNA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/edn3.70120","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The analysis of environmental DNA (eDNA) has become a non-invasive, cost-efficient, and universal biomonitoring tool, widely applied across the globe. Most eDNA research focuses on aquatic organisms in freshwater and marine environments. eDNA shedding rates are key to interpreting eDNA-based results, such as for abundance estimations or detection probabilities. Shedding rates have been estimated for several species and life stages; however, virtually all of them are aquatic. As eDNA-based biomonitoring expands to terrestrial systems, waterborne eDNA from freshwater is increasingly used to assess species presence of terrestrial mammals. When interacting with the water, terrestrial mammals deposit their DNA into the water body, with the amount deposited presumably heavily depending on the interaction type. Here we quantify eDNA shedding rates from domestic dogs during various interactions with water bodies, including “passing by”, “drinking”, “crossing through”, “standing still” and “defecating.” “Crossing through” and “defecating” had the highest DNA shedding rates (both approx. 4 × 107 pg/h/ind). All direct water interactions led to eDNA shedding rates several orders of magnitude higher than those of the indirect interaction (“passing by”), resulting in higher eDNA concentrations and, consequently, higher eDNA detection probabilities. This has important implications for interpretations of eDNA-based data from such water bodies. We also highlight the high variability of eDNA concentrations across experimental replicates, which needs to be accounted for when designing eDNA sampling schemes.

水相互作用类型影响陆生哺乳动物eDNA进入地表水体的环境DNA脱落率
环境DNA (environmental DNA, eDNA)分析已成为一种无创、经济、通用的生物监测工具,在全球范围内得到广泛应用。大多数eDNA研究集中在淡水和海洋环境中的水生生物。eDNA脱落率是解释基于eDNA的结果的关键,例如丰度估计或检测概率。已经估计了几个物种和生命阶段的脱落率;然而,实际上它们都是水生动物。随着基于eDNA的生物监测扩展到陆地系统,来自淡水的水生eDNA越来越多地用于评估陆生哺乳动物的物种存在。当与水相互作用时,陆生哺乳动物将它们的DNA沉积到水体中,沉积的数量可能在很大程度上取决于相互作用的类型。在这里,我们量化了家狗在与水体的各种相互作用中,包括“经过”、“饮用”、“穿越”、“静止”和“排便”时的eDNA脱落率。“穿越”和“排便”的DNA脱落率最高(均约为10%)。4 × 107 pg/h/ind)。所有直接的水相互作用导致eDNA脱落率比间接相互作用(“经过”)的速率高几个数量级,导致更高的eDNA浓度,因此,更高的eDNA检测概率。这对于解释来自此类水体的基于edna的数据具有重要意义。我们还强调了eDNA浓度在实验重复中的高度可变性,这在设计eDNA采样方案时需要考虑到。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental DNA
Environmental DNA Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
99
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信