M. Vaccaro , G. Polito , G. Bagaglini , M. Capuozzo , R. Langella , E. Nava , A. Zovi , F. Ferrara
{"title":"Comparison and analysis of biological drug consumption in two Italian hospital settings: Governance actions and prescribing appropriateness","authors":"M. Vaccaro , G. Polito , G. Bagaglini , M. Capuozzo , R. Langella , E. Nava , A. Zovi , F. Ferrara","doi":"10.1016/j.jhqr.2025.101148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Biosimilar drugs represent a valuable opportunity for healthcare systems worldwide, offering substantial cost savings while ensuring equivalent efficacy and safety in treating chronic conditions. These savings can be reinvested in ongoing medical innovation.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>An investigation was carried out to evaluate the utilization of key biologic therapies across various clinical indications within two Italian healthcare institutions: Asl Napoli 3 Sud and Policlinico Umberto I in Rome. Information regarding consumption and expenditure was extracted from institutional databases. A comparison with figures from 2021 was conducted to detect any growth in biosimilar adoption throughout 2022.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The 2022 review demonstrated that most of the examined compounds were administered predominantly as biosimilars, with proportions nearing complete substitution, aside from some notable outliers. In particular, reluctance persisted in prescribing biosimilar adalimumab (73.8%) and etanercept (73.3%) at Asl Napoli 3 Sud, as well as erythropoietin (69.5%) and rituximab (72.8%) at Policlinico Umberto I.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The year-on-year comparison between 2021 and 2022 underscored a growing shift toward biosimilar prescriptions. This favorable direction indicates the likelihood of reaching full implementation soon, with meaningful advantages for the National Healthcare Service and citizens, promoting an efficient and economically viable model of care.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37347,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Healthcare Quality Research","volume":"40 6","pages":"Article 101148"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Healthcare Quality Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2603647925000600","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Biosimilar drugs represent a valuable opportunity for healthcare systems worldwide, offering substantial cost savings while ensuring equivalent efficacy and safety in treating chronic conditions. These savings can be reinvested in ongoing medical innovation.
Methods
An investigation was carried out to evaluate the utilization of key biologic therapies across various clinical indications within two Italian healthcare institutions: Asl Napoli 3 Sud and Policlinico Umberto I in Rome. Information regarding consumption and expenditure was extracted from institutional databases. A comparison with figures from 2021 was conducted to detect any growth in biosimilar adoption throughout 2022.
Results
The 2022 review demonstrated that most of the examined compounds were administered predominantly as biosimilars, with proportions nearing complete substitution, aside from some notable outliers. In particular, reluctance persisted in prescribing biosimilar adalimumab (73.8%) and etanercept (73.3%) at Asl Napoli 3 Sud, as well as erythropoietin (69.5%) and rituximab (72.8%) at Policlinico Umberto I.
Conclusion
The year-on-year comparison between 2021 and 2022 underscored a growing shift toward biosimilar prescriptions. This favorable direction indicates the likelihood of reaching full implementation soon, with meaningful advantages for the National Healthcare Service and citizens, promoting an efficient and economically viable model of care.
期刊介绍:
Revista de Calidad Asistencial (Quality Healthcare) (RCA) is the official Journal of the Spanish Society of Quality Healthcare (Sociedad Española de Calidad Asistencial) (SECA) and is a tool for the dissemination of knowledge and reflection for the quality management of health services in Primary Care, as well as in Hospitals. It publishes articles associated with any aspect of research in the field of public health and health administration, including health education, epidemiology, medical statistics, health information, health economics, quality management, and health policies. The Journal publishes 6 issues, exclusively in electronic format. The Journal publishes, in Spanish, Original works, Special and Review Articles, as well as other sections. Articles are subjected to a rigorous, double blind, review process (peer review)