{"title":"ESG rating disagreement and supply chain bargaining power: evidence from China","authors":"Yuxiu Si , Gongliang Wu","doi":"10.1016/j.frl.2025.107699","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study uses data from Chinese A-share listed firms between 2015 and 2022 to examine the impact of ESG rating disagreement on firms' supply chain bargaining power. The findings indicate that ESG rating disagreement has a significant negative impact on supply chain bargaining power, while high-quality information disclosure can significantly mitigate this adverse effect. The mechanism analysis reveals that ESG rating disagreement hinders the expansion of firms' supply chain bargaining power by affecting investor sentiment and increasing reputational risks. Heterogeneity analysis further shows that the suppressive effect of ESG rating disagreement on supply chain bargaining power is more pronounced in state-owned enterprises, firms in regions with low levels of marketization, and non-heavy-polluting firms. This study provides important insights for improving ESG ratings and promoting the development of a unified and comprehensive ESG rating system.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12167,"journal":{"name":"Finance Research Letters","volume":"83 ","pages":"Article 107699"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Finance Research Letters","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1544612325009584","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study uses data from Chinese A-share listed firms between 2015 and 2022 to examine the impact of ESG rating disagreement on firms' supply chain bargaining power. The findings indicate that ESG rating disagreement has a significant negative impact on supply chain bargaining power, while high-quality information disclosure can significantly mitigate this adverse effect. The mechanism analysis reveals that ESG rating disagreement hinders the expansion of firms' supply chain bargaining power by affecting investor sentiment and increasing reputational risks. Heterogeneity analysis further shows that the suppressive effect of ESG rating disagreement on supply chain bargaining power is more pronounced in state-owned enterprises, firms in regions with low levels of marketization, and non-heavy-polluting firms. This study provides important insights for improving ESG ratings and promoting the development of a unified and comprehensive ESG rating system.
期刊介绍:
Finance Research Letters welcomes submissions across all areas of finance, aiming for rapid publication of significant new findings. The journal particularly encourages papers that provide insight into the replicability of established results, examine the cross-national applicability of previous findings, challenge existing methodologies, or demonstrate methodological contingencies.
Papers are invited in the following areas:
Actuarial studies
Alternative investments
Asset Pricing
Bankruptcy and liquidation
Banks and other Depository Institutions
Behavioral and experimental finance
Bibliometric and Scientometric studies of finance
Capital budgeting and corporate investment
Capital markets and accounting
Capital structure and payout policy
Commodities
Contagion, crises and interdependence
Corporate governance
Credit and fixed income markets and instruments
Derivatives
Emerging markets
Energy Finance and Energy Markets
Financial Econometrics
Financial History
Financial intermediation and money markets
Financial markets and marketplaces
Financial Mathematics and Econophysics
Financial Regulation and Law
Forecasting
Frontier market studies
International Finance
Market efficiency, event studies
Mergers, acquisitions and the market for corporate control
Micro Finance Institutions
Microstructure
Non-bank Financial Institutions
Personal Finance
Portfolio choice and investing
Real estate finance and investing
Risk
SME, Family and Entrepreneurial Finance