La thérapie des schémas est-elle pertinente pour une population adulte souffrant de TSPT et de TSPT-complexe ? Une revue de littérature systématique qualitative

IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q4 PSYCHIATRY
Émilie Ubico , Anne Plantade-Gipch , Nathalie Duriez
{"title":"La thérapie des schémas est-elle pertinente pour une population adulte souffrant de TSPT et de TSPT-complexe ? Une revue de littérature systématique qualitative","authors":"Émilie Ubico ,&nbsp;Anne Plantade-Gipch ,&nbsp;Nathalie Duriez","doi":"10.1016/j.amp.2024.09.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Context</h3><div>Schema therapy (ST) involves two core concepts: early maladaptive schemas and modes. Early maladaptive schemas play a key role in the development and maintenance of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), while observed modes reflect the internalized relationships of the traumatized individual. Given this context, how might ST be an interesting psychotherapeutic approach for a population suffering from PTSD or complex post-traumatic stress disorder (CPTSD)?</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Considering the impact of trauma and/or adversity on the subject's psychological development, ST could be relevant for a population suffering from PTSD or CPTSD. This study aims to explore the effectiveness of ST in treating an adult population suffering from PTSD or CPTSD, through a review of qualitative literature.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Following the PRISMA guidelines, articles were searched from December 2023 to May 2024 on PubMed, Google Scholar, PsycInfo, and the Cochrane Library, with specific eligibility criteria: studies on ST, adult population with PTSD or CPTSD, with no publication year limit. Data extraction considered the studied pathology (PTSD or CPTSD), research methodology, therapeutic setting (group/individual), measurement tools, and therapy effects.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Numerous studies explore the early maladaptive schemas of traumatized individuals, while others observe the effectiveness of ST in various clinical populations. However, few studies focus specifically on PTSD or CPTSD. The research process, summarized in a flow diagram, identified 989 articles, of which twelve were selected and analyzed, involving for 302 participants. Given the predominantly qualitative nature of the studies, a qualitative synthesis was deemed appropriate. Researchers’ chosen diagnoses varied according to the nosographic reference (DSM-5 for PTSD, ICD-11 for CPTSD). ST was found to reduce post-traumatic symptoms but also impacts overall psychiatric symptoms, anxiety, depression, suicidal thoughts, and the severity of substance and/or alcohol addiction. Improvements were observed in overall functioning, emotional regulation, interpersonal relationships, socio-professional life, quality of life, and self-esteem. ST is found to be relevant when exposure therapy was ineffective for trauma treatment.</div></div><div><h3>Research methodologies vary</h3><div>Quantitative studies demonstrated ST's effectiveness, while case studies explore the process of change at work in therapy and ST's efficacy. Some biases were noted, particularly in session transcription practices, the small number of comparison groups, and the absence of independent evaluations. Psychotherapeutic interventions included individual and/or group-based approaches, utilizing cognitive, behavioral, and experiential tools, including imagery rescripting or chair work. Only one study adapted its group therapy content to the three-phase approach recommended in psychotraumatology. As an integrative approach, some researchers innovatively combined ST with Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) to address traumatic and addiction memories or with psychoanalysis to work on dreams through imagery rescripting.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>Several discussion points were explored. Contemporary psychotraumatology and its theoretical foundations, particularly the concepts of dissociation and integration, could enrich ST work for the studied population. Studying common factors, particularly the therapeutic alliance, would further illuminate the psychotherapeutic process, given ST's emphasis on the therapeutic relationship and attachment. Group therapy seems to reawaken previous family issues, with emotional regulation strategies implemented within the group. Examining group cohesion quality would clarify individual and group psychotherapeutic progress. Finally, contextual ST, integrating acceptance and commitment therapy principles, remains an unexplored avenue with this population.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>To bridge the gap between research and practice, action research in ST, combining individual and group therapy for CPTSD patients, would enhance understanding of the mechanisms of change within this therapeutic model.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7992,"journal":{"name":"Annales medico-psychologiques","volume":"183 6","pages":"Pages 662-672"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annales medico-psychologiques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003448724002956","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context

Schema therapy (ST) involves two core concepts: early maladaptive schemas and modes. Early maladaptive schemas play a key role in the development and maintenance of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), while observed modes reflect the internalized relationships of the traumatized individual. Given this context, how might ST be an interesting psychotherapeutic approach for a population suffering from PTSD or complex post-traumatic stress disorder (CPTSD)?

Objectives

Considering the impact of trauma and/or adversity on the subject's psychological development, ST could be relevant for a population suffering from PTSD or CPTSD. This study aims to explore the effectiveness of ST in treating an adult population suffering from PTSD or CPTSD, through a review of qualitative literature.

Methods

Following the PRISMA guidelines, articles were searched from December 2023 to May 2024 on PubMed, Google Scholar, PsycInfo, and the Cochrane Library, with specific eligibility criteria: studies on ST, adult population with PTSD or CPTSD, with no publication year limit. Data extraction considered the studied pathology (PTSD or CPTSD), research methodology, therapeutic setting (group/individual), measurement tools, and therapy effects.

Results

Numerous studies explore the early maladaptive schemas of traumatized individuals, while others observe the effectiveness of ST in various clinical populations. However, few studies focus specifically on PTSD or CPTSD. The research process, summarized in a flow diagram, identified 989 articles, of which twelve were selected and analyzed, involving for 302 participants. Given the predominantly qualitative nature of the studies, a qualitative synthesis was deemed appropriate. Researchers’ chosen diagnoses varied according to the nosographic reference (DSM-5 for PTSD, ICD-11 for CPTSD). ST was found to reduce post-traumatic symptoms but also impacts overall psychiatric symptoms, anxiety, depression, suicidal thoughts, and the severity of substance and/or alcohol addiction. Improvements were observed in overall functioning, emotional regulation, interpersonal relationships, socio-professional life, quality of life, and self-esteem. ST is found to be relevant when exposure therapy was ineffective for trauma treatment.

Research methodologies vary

Quantitative studies demonstrated ST's effectiveness, while case studies explore the process of change at work in therapy and ST's efficacy. Some biases were noted, particularly in session transcription practices, the small number of comparison groups, and the absence of independent evaluations. Psychotherapeutic interventions included individual and/or group-based approaches, utilizing cognitive, behavioral, and experiential tools, including imagery rescripting or chair work. Only one study adapted its group therapy content to the three-phase approach recommended in psychotraumatology. As an integrative approach, some researchers innovatively combined ST with Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) to address traumatic and addiction memories or with psychoanalysis to work on dreams through imagery rescripting.

Discussion

Several discussion points were explored. Contemporary psychotraumatology and its theoretical foundations, particularly the concepts of dissociation and integration, could enrich ST work for the studied population. Studying common factors, particularly the therapeutic alliance, would further illuminate the psychotherapeutic process, given ST's emphasis on the therapeutic relationship and attachment. Group therapy seems to reawaken previous family issues, with emotional regulation strategies implemented within the group. Examining group cohesion quality would clarify individual and group psychotherapeutic progress. Finally, contextual ST, integrating acceptance and commitment therapy principles, remains an unexplored avenue with this population.

Conclusion

To bridge the gap between research and practice, action research in ST, combining individual and group therapy for CPTSD patients, would enhance understanding of the mechanisms of change within this therapeutic model.
模式治疗是否适用于患有创伤后应激障碍和创伤后应激障碍复合体的成人人群?系统的定性文献综述
语境图式疗法包括两个核心概念:早期适应不良图式和模式。早期适应不良图式在创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的发展和维持中起着关键作用,而观察到的模式反映了创伤后个体的内化关系。在这种背景下,ST如何可能成为一种有趣的心理治疗方法,用于患有创伤后应激障碍或复杂创伤后应激障碍(CPTSD)的人群?考虑到创伤和/或逆境对受试者心理发展的影响,ST可能与患有PTSD或CPTSD的人群有关。本研究旨在通过对定性文献的回顾,探讨ST治疗成人PTSD或CPTSD的有效性。方法按照PRISMA指南,检索2023年12月至2024年5月在PubMed、谷歌Scholar、PsycInfo和Cochrane Library上的文章,具体的入选标准是:ST、成年PTSD或CPTSD人群的研究,没有发表年份限制。数据提取考虑了所研究的病理(PTSD或CPTSD)、研究方法、治疗环境(群体/个人)、测量工具和治疗效果。结果许多研究探讨了创伤个体的早期适应不良模式,而其他研究则观察了ST在不同临床人群中的有效性。然而,很少有研究专门关注PTSD或cpptsd。研究过程,总结在一个流程图中,确定了989篇文章,其中12篇被选择和分析,涉及302名参与者。鉴于这些研究的主要性质是定性的,因此定性的综合被认为是适当的。研究人员选择的诊断根据医院参考(DSM-5为PTSD, ICD-11为CPTSD)而有所不同。研究发现,ST可以减轻创伤后症状,但也会影响整体精神症状、焦虑、抑郁、自杀念头以及物质和/或酒精成瘾的严重程度。在整体功能、情绪调节、人际关系、社会职业生活、生活质量和自尊方面观察到改善。当暴露疗法对创伤治疗无效时,发现ST是相关的。研究方法各不相同定量研究证明了ST的有效性,而案例研究探索了治疗中工作的变化过程和ST的功效。注意到一些偏差,特别是在会话转录实践中,较少的对照组和缺乏独立评估。心理治疗干预包括以个人和/或团体为基础的方法,利用认知、行为和经验工具,包括图像重写或椅子工作。只有一项研究将其小组治疗内容调整为心理创伤学中推荐的三阶段方法。作为一种综合方法,一些研究人员创新性地将ST与眼动脱敏和再加工(EMDR)结合起来,以解决创伤和成瘾记忆,或与精神分析结合,通过图像重新描述来研究梦。讨论探讨了几个讨论点。当代心理创伤学及其理论基础,特别是分离和整合的概念,可以为研究人群丰富ST工作。考虑到ST强调治疗关系和依恋,研究共同因素,特别是治疗联盟,将进一步阐明心理治疗过程。团体治疗似乎重新唤醒了以前的家庭问题,并在小组内实施了情绪调节策略。检视团体凝聚力品质,可厘清个人及团体的心理治疗进展。最后,整合接受和承诺治疗原则的情境性ST仍然是这一人群尚未探索的途径。结论为弥合研究与实践之间的差距,开展ST的行动研究,结合个体和团体治疗CPTSD患者,将有助于加深对这一治疗模式变化机制的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annales medico-psychologiques
Annales medico-psychologiques 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
33.30%
发文量
196
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Annales Médico-Psychologiques is a peer-reviewed medical journal covering the field of psychiatry. Articles are published in French or in English. The journal was established in 1843 and is published by Elsevier on behalf of the Société Médico-Psychologique. The journal publishes 10 times a year original articles covering biological, genetic, psychological, forensic and cultural issues relevant to the diagnosis and treatment of mental illness, as well as peer reviewed articles that have been presented and discussed during meetings of the Société Médico-Psychologique.To report on the major currents of thought of contemporary psychiatry, and to publish clinical and biological research of international standard, these are the aims of the Annales Médico-Psychologiques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信