Quantitative assessment of dose accumulation uncertainty using a commercial deformable image registration algorithm in adaptive intensity-modulated proton therapy for prostate cancer

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Yihang Xu , John Chetley Ford , Kyle R. Padgett , Nesrin Dogan
{"title":"Quantitative assessment of dose accumulation uncertainty using a commercial deformable image registration algorithm in adaptive intensity-modulated proton therapy for prostate cancer","authors":"Yihang Xu ,&nbsp;John Chetley Ford ,&nbsp;Kyle R. Padgett ,&nbsp;Nesrin Dogan","doi":"10.1016/j.ejmp.2025.105011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>This work aims to quantify the dose accumulation uncertainty for prostate adaptive intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Pelvic CT images from ten prostate patients with 6 repeat CT (rCT) scans were selected. The reference DVFs (DVF<sub>ref</sub>) were generated by performing DIR between planning CT (pCT) and rCTs using a reference DIR algorithm. Pseudo-rCTs were created by deforming pCT to rCTs using the DVF<sub>ref</sub>. An IMPT plan was created for each patient on pCT, which was recalculated on each pseudo-rCT. The fractional dose was warped back to pCT using DVF (DVF<sub>test</sub>) generated by a commercial DIR algorithm which uses a ‘deformable multi pass (DMP)’ algorithm or ‘structure-guided deformable (SGD)’ if DMP failed. The DVF<sub>test</sub> deformed dose was compared to the DVF<sub>ref</sub> deformed dose. Registration error (RE) and inverse consistency error (ICE) were assessed for DVF<sub>test</sub>.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>When using only DMP, the RE throughout the whole body was 1.17 ± 1.22 mm. Overall, the ICE for all voxels was 0.18 ± 0.5 mm. The dose deformation uncertainty was 0.02 % ± 2.53 % over the whole body, with the highest uncertainty observed in the bladder (0.83 % ± 6.66 %) and high dose gradient regions. When incorporating SGD, the dose deformation uncertainty inside the CTV was changed from 0.11 % ± 2.42 % to 0.15 % ± 1.4 %, and the uncertainty range of dose accumulation for CTV V100 was reduced from (−3.39 %, 5.49 %) to (−0.31 %, 3.43 %).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study demonstrated that a commercial DIR algorithm is well-suited for prostate IMPT dose accumulation with acceptable geometric and dosimetric uncertainty. The incorporation of SGD has the potential to reduce the uncertainty.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56092,"journal":{"name":"Physica Medica-European Journal of Medical Physics","volume":"135 ","pages":"Article 105011"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physica Medica-European Journal of Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1120179725001218","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

This work aims to quantify the dose accumulation uncertainty for prostate adaptive intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT).

Methods

Pelvic CT images from ten prostate patients with 6 repeat CT (rCT) scans were selected. The reference DVFs (DVFref) were generated by performing DIR between planning CT (pCT) and rCTs using a reference DIR algorithm. Pseudo-rCTs were created by deforming pCT to rCTs using the DVFref. An IMPT plan was created for each patient on pCT, which was recalculated on each pseudo-rCT. The fractional dose was warped back to pCT using DVF (DVFtest) generated by a commercial DIR algorithm which uses a ‘deformable multi pass (DMP)’ algorithm or ‘structure-guided deformable (SGD)’ if DMP failed. The DVFtest deformed dose was compared to the DVFref deformed dose. Registration error (RE) and inverse consistency error (ICE) were assessed for DVFtest.

Results

When using only DMP, the RE throughout the whole body was 1.17 ± 1.22 mm. Overall, the ICE for all voxels was 0.18 ± 0.5 mm. The dose deformation uncertainty was 0.02 % ± 2.53 % over the whole body, with the highest uncertainty observed in the bladder (0.83 % ± 6.66 %) and high dose gradient regions. When incorporating SGD, the dose deformation uncertainty inside the CTV was changed from 0.11 % ± 2.42 % to 0.15 % ± 1.4 %, and the uncertainty range of dose accumulation for CTV V100 was reduced from (−3.39 %, 5.49 %) to (−0.31 %, 3.43 %).

Conclusions

This study demonstrated that a commercial DIR algorithm is well-suited for prostate IMPT dose accumulation with acceptable geometric and dosimetric uncertainty. The incorporation of SGD has the potential to reduce the uncertainty.
自适应调强质子治疗前列腺癌中剂量累积不确定度的定量评估使用商业变形图像配准算法
本研究旨在量化前列腺适应性强度调节质子治疗(IMPT)的剂量积累不确定性。方法选择10例前列腺病患者6次重复CT (rCT)扫描的盆腔CT图像。参考dvf (DVFref)是通过使用参考DIR算法在规划CT (pCT)和rct之间进行DIR生成的。伪rct是通过使用DVFref将pCT变形为rct而创建的。在pCT上为每个患者创建一个IMPT计划,并在每个伪rct上重新计算。使用商业DIR算法生成的DVF (DVFtest)将分数剂量扭曲回pCT,该算法使用“可变形多通道(DMP)”算法或“结构引导可变形(SGD)”(如果DMP失败)。将DVFtest变形剂量与DVFref变形剂量进行比较。评估DVFtest的配准误差(RE)和逆一致性误差(ICE)。结果仅使用DMP时,全身RE为1.17 ± 1.22 mm。总体而言,所有体素的ICE为0.18 ± 0.5 mm。全身剂量变形不确定度为0.02 % ± 2.53 %,其中膀胱和高剂量梯度区域的不确定度最高(0.83 % ± 6.66 %)。将SGD时,剂量变形改变了不确定性在CTV从0.11 % ±2.42  % 0.15 % ±1.4  %,和剂量积累的不确定性范围CTV V100减少从(5.49−3.39 %, %)到(3.43−0.31 %, %)。结论本研究表明,商业DIR算法非常适合前列腺IMPT剂量累积,具有可接受的几何和剂量学不确定性。SGD的合并有可能减少不确定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
14.70%
发文量
493
审稿时长
78 days
期刊介绍: Physica Medica, European Journal of Medical Physics, publishing with Elsevier from 2007, provides an international forum for research and reviews on the following main topics: Medical Imaging Radiation Therapy Radiation Protection Measuring Systems and Signal Processing Education and training in Medical Physics Professional issues in Medical Physics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信