{"title":"Spatialising the ecological impacts of alien species into risk maps","authors":"Océane Boulesnane-Guengant , Mathieu Rouget , Antoine Becker-Scarpitta , Christophe Botella , Sabrina Kumschick","doi":"10.1016/j.gecco.2025.e03660","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Spatial assessments of the ecological impacts of alien species are needed to integrate impacts into biodiversity conservation policies and management strategies. We developed standardised approaches for aggregating impact scores at both species and site levels, synthesising the ecological impacts of alien species into risk maps. We applied these approaches to 33 Australian <em>Acacia</em> species introduced in South Africa. Creating risk maps involves four main steps: (1) perform impact assessment per species; (2) combine impact categories into one score per species; (3) gather species occurrence data into standardised grid cells; and (4) combine impact scores across species per grid cell into a risk map. We proposed six risk maps based on different assumptions of impact aggregation. All risk maps revealed important variation in environmental impacts of alien <em>Acacia</em> species across South Africa. The only exception was the precautionary risk map, which indicated that nearly all the areas occupied by <em>Acacia</em> had high risk, whereas the other risk maps identified between 5 % and 14 % with high risk. Risk maps provide additional information compared to maps of alien species richness and can help identifying areas where greater ecological impacts are likely. The approaches for risk maps can be applied to any taxon with available data on their distribution and ecological impacts. Our approach can be used to identify and prioritise sites with potential high impact. Based on the future risk map, we suggest five management strategies to limit the expansion of impactful species, of for clearing impactful species.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54264,"journal":{"name":"Global Ecology and Conservation","volume":"61 ","pages":"Article e03660"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Ecology and Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351989425002616","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Spatial assessments of the ecological impacts of alien species are needed to integrate impacts into biodiversity conservation policies and management strategies. We developed standardised approaches for aggregating impact scores at both species and site levels, synthesising the ecological impacts of alien species into risk maps. We applied these approaches to 33 Australian Acacia species introduced in South Africa. Creating risk maps involves four main steps: (1) perform impact assessment per species; (2) combine impact categories into one score per species; (3) gather species occurrence data into standardised grid cells; and (4) combine impact scores across species per grid cell into a risk map. We proposed six risk maps based on different assumptions of impact aggregation. All risk maps revealed important variation in environmental impacts of alien Acacia species across South Africa. The only exception was the precautionary risk map, which indicated that nearly all the areas occupied by Acacia had high risk, whereas the other risk maps identified between 5 % and 14 % with high risk. Risk maps provide additional information compared to maps of alien species richness and can help identifying areas where greater ecological impacts are likely. The approaches for risk maps can be applied to any taxon with available data on their distribution and ecological impacts. Our approach can be used to identify and prioritise sites with potential high impact. Based on the future risk map, we suggest five management strategies to limit the expansion of impactful species, of for clearing impactful species.
期刊介绍:
Global Ecology and Conservation is a peer-reviewed, open-access journal covering all sub-disciplines of ecological and conservation science: from theory to practice, from molecules to ecosystems, from regional to global. The fields covered include: organismal, population, community, and ecosystem ecology; physiological, evolutionary, and behavioral ecology; and conservation science.